Skip to main content

The Role of Technology in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Power Sector in Developing Countries: The Case of China, India, and Mexico

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Climate Change - The Technology Challenge

Part of the book series: Advances in Global Change Research ((AGLO,volume 38))

Abstract

China, India, and Mexico are among the top developing country emitters of CO2. The electric power sectors in China and India is dominated by coal-fired power plants, whereas fuel oil and natural gas are the key fossil fuels in Mexico. Spurred by economic development and population growth, demand for electricity in these countries is expected to continue to rise. Meeting this increased demand will have a significant impact on emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG). While available portfolio of generation and mitigation technologies may not suffice to arrest the growth of emissions, it can help reduce the rate of emissions growth. To achieve significant reductions, multiple approaches are required, such as reducing demand by adopting end-use efficiency improvement measures, accelerating the deployment of renewable and nuclear power, and adopting cleaner more efficient generation technologies. Retrofitting the existing fleet to meet strengthened environmental standards, and accelerated fleet-turnover, coupled with adoption of state-of-the-art high efficiency generation technologies, such as supercritical and ultra-supercritical boilers and advanced combined-cycle gas turbines, should play an important role in meeting the increasing demand with the least amount of GHG emissions. In parallel, significant R&D efforts will have to be undertaken to adapt off-the-shelf generation technologies to suit local needs. In the medium to long term, developed countries will need to provide financial and technical support for these countries and partner with them to develop, design, demonstrate, and deploy technologies for capturing and sequestering carbon dioxide.

The findings included in this chapter do not necessarily reflect the view or policies of the Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute Agency endorsement or recommendation for use. Views expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent those of ICF International.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     The terms in IPAT identity or equation, originally coined by Ehrlich and Holdren [3], stand for Impact  =  Population × Affluence × Technology.

  2. 2.

     In October 2009, in a major move, CFE, the Mexican state owned utility announced take-over of smaller state-owned utility LFC. The key reason cited for this move is inefficiency of LFC’s operations [38].

References

  1. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers of the synthesis report of the IPCC fourth assessment report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marland G, Boden TA et al (2007) Global, regional, and national CO2 emissions. In Trends: a compendium of data on global change. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/em_cont.htm. Accessed Sept 2007

  3. Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171:1212–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. IEA (2008) Key world energy statistics 2008. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gregg JS, Andres RJ et al (2008) China: emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production. Geophys Res Lett 35:L08806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. IEA (2008) World Energy Outlook 2008. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  7. SEMARNAT (2007) Estrategia Nacional de Cambio. Comisión Intersecretarial de Cambio Climático Climático. Secretaría De Medio Ambiente Y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Distrito Federal, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chikkatur AP (2008) A resource and technology asssessment of coal utilization in India. Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  9. IEA (2007) World energy outlook 2007: China and India insights. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao L, Xiao Y, Gallagher KS, Wang B, Xu X (2008) Technical, environmental, and economic assessment of deploying advanced coal power technologies in the Chinese context. Energy Policy 36(7):2709–2718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhenhua X (2005) China’s power sector on fast track. China Daily Special Supplement, 16 May 2005

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xu S, Chen W (2006) The reform of electricity power sector in the PR of China. Energy Policy 34:2455–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qiu J (2008) The environmental challenge of coal combustion in China. Presentation at US. EPA, Washington, DC, 15 Apr 2008

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang H, Nakata T (2009) Analysis of the market penetration of clean coal technologies and its impacts in China’s electricity sector. Energy Policy 37:338–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. IEA (2008) Energy technology perspectives 2008: scenarios & strategies to 2050. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yi H, Hao J et al (2007) Atmospheric environmental protection in China: current status, developmental trend and research emphasis. Energy Policy 35:907–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao L (2008) Economic assessment of deploying advanced coal power technologies in the Chinese context. Presentation at ETIP seminar series, Cambridge: Energy technology innovation policy research group, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 19 Feb 2008

    Google Scholar 

  18. MoP (2008) Power sector at a glance. Ministry of Power (MoP), Govt of India, New Delhi. http://powermin.nic.in/JSP_SERVLETS/internal.jsp. Accessed 12 Sept 2008

  19. MoP (2006) Annual report 2005–06. Ministry of Power, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chikkatur AP, Sagar AD (2007) Cleaner power in India: towards a clean-coal-technology roadmap. Discussion paper 2007–06. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  21. TERI (2004) TERI Energy Data Directory and Yearbook (TEDDY) 2003–04. The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dubash NK, Rajan SC (2001) Power politics: process of power sector reforms in India. Econ Polit Wkly 36:3367–3390

    Google Scholar 

  23. MoP (2008) Annual report 2007–08: power – the building block of economy. Ministry of Power, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  24. CEA (2000) Sixteenth electric power survey of India. Central Electricity Authority, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  25. Planning Commission (2006) Integrated energy policy: report of the expert committee. Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  26. CEA (1997) Fourth national power plan 1997–2012. Central Electricity Authority, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gopalakrishnan A (2005) Indo-US nuclear cooperation: a non-starter? Econ Polit Wkly 40(27):2935–2940

    Google Scholar 

  28. MoEF (2004) India’s initial national communication to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chikkatur A (2005) Making the best use of India’s coal resources. Econ Polit Wkly 40:5457–5461

    Google Scholar 

  30. CEA (2003) Report of the committee to recommend next higher size of coal fired thermal power stations. Central Electricity Authority, Ministry of Power, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  31. IEA (2002) Coal in the energy supply of India. International Energy Agency – Coal Industry Advisory Board, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sachdev RK (1998) Beneficiation of coal – an economic option for the Indian power industry. In: 17th World Energy Congress, Houston, 13–18 Sept 1998

    Google Scholar 

  33. Visuvasam D, Selvaraj P et al (2005) Influence of coal properties on particulate emission control in thermal power plants in India. In: Second international conference on clean coal technologies for our future (CCT 2005), Sardinia

    Google Scholar 

  34. Masto RE, Ram LC et al. (2007) Soil contamination and human health risks in coal mining environs. In: 1st international conference on managing the social and environmental consequences of coal mining in India, New Delhi, Indian School of Mines University, Dhanbad

    Google Scholar 

  35. EIA (2007) Country analysis briefs: Mexico. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  36. Flores-Montalvo A (2005) Private vs. public ownership of power generation in Mexico: should environmental policymakers care? Doctoral thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  37. Breceda M (2000) Debate on reform of the electricity sector in Mexico. Report on its background, current status and outlook, North American commission on environmental cooperation, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  38. SENER (2010) Sector Eléctrico Nacional – Generación Bruta. Secretaría de Energía. Distrito Federal, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  39. SENER (2008) Sector Eléctrico Nacional – Generación Bruta. Secretaría de Energía, Distrito Federal, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  40. SENER (2008) Consumo de Combustibles Secretaría de Energía. Distrito Federal, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  41. Molina LT, Molina MJ (2002) Air quality in the Mexico megacity: an integrated assessment. Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vijay S, Sanchez S et al. (2008) Structural shift in the Mexican power sector – implications for air emissions. In: International Energy Workshop 2008, Paris, 30 June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  43. CEA (2007) Report of the working group on power for 11th plan. Central Electricity Authority, Government of India, New Delhi. http://cea.nic.in/planning/WG%2021.3.07%20pdf/03%20Contents.pdf

  44. Chikkatur AP, Sagar AD (2010) Rethinking India’s coal-power technology trajectory. Econ Polit Wkly 44(46):53–58

    Google Scholar 

  45. Edmonds J, Wise M et al (2007) Global energy technology strategy – addressing climate change: phase 2 findings from an International Public-Private Sponsored Research Program. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chikkatur AP, Sagar AD (2009) Positioning the Indian coal-power sector for carbon mitigation: key policy options. Pew Center for Global Climate Change, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  47. IAEA (2008) Power reactor information system. http://www.iaea.or.at/programmes/a2/. Accessed 12 Dec 2008

  48. Dubash NK, Rao DN (2007) The practice and politics of regulation: regulatory governance in Indian electricity. Macmillan, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dubash NK, Singh D (2005) Of rocks and hard places: a critical overview of recent global experience with electricity restructuring. Econ Polit Wkly 40:5249–5259

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sharma DP, Chandramohanan Nair PS, Balasubramanian R (2005) Performance of Indian power sector during a decade under restructuring: a critique. Energy Policy 33:563–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Singh A (2006) Power sector reform in India: current issues and prospects. Energy Policy 34:2480–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. IEA (2006) China’s power sector reforms. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibarra-Yunez A (2008) Electricity reform in Mexico: challenges for an integrated North American market. The Centre for International Governance Innovation. http://www.portalfornorthamerica.org/teaching-resources/electricity-reform-mexico-challenges-integrated-north-american-market#bibliography

  54. SENAR (2011) SECTOR ELÉCTRICO NACIONAL - PROYECTOS DE GENERACIÓN EN PROCESO DE CONSTRUCCIÓN. Secretaría de Energía, Distrito Federal, Mexico. http://www.energia.gob.mx/res/PE_y_DT/ee/Proyectos_de_Generacion_en_proseso_de_Construccion.xls

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samudra Vijay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vijay, S., Chikkatur, A. (2011). The Role of Technology in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Power Sector in Developing Countries: The Case of China, India, and Mexico. In: Princiotta, F. (eds) Global Climate Change - The Technology Challenge. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3153-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics