Skip to main content

Policies for Sharing Benefits from Hoodia

  • Chapter
Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing

Abstract

This chapter provides an analysis of the policies and laws that have emerged in southern Africa to regulate the harvesting, trade, and commercial development of Hoodia. Many of these policies have evolved rapidly, alongside the commercialisation of Hoodia and the increasing prominence of access and benefit sharing as a policy issue. However, policy implementation has been challenging, complicated by the fact that both the traditional knowledge that was used to develop Hoodia and the species involved cross national borders and involve a number of distinct indigenous communities. Each of the three countries with which Hoodia and its knowledge are associated has evolved a distinct regulatory approach towards the plant's conservation and use, and to the way in which ABS issues are framed. Moreover, southern African countries are at very different points of legislating for ABS, hold inconsistent understandings of the role of traditional knowledge holders, and also have varied approaches and capacities for bioprospecting and natural product development. While these more slippery political issues of benefit sharing and indigenous peoples remain disconnected and incoherent between southern African countries, those countries have increasingly collaborated to design joint policies for Hoodia management, with steps put in place to collaborate more strongly on poaching, trade and the transport of illegally harvested material. This bodes well for future cooperation and suggests a positive environment within which policy resolutions can be found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • CBD (2009). Report of the Seventh Meeting of the Ad-Hoc Open-Ended Working Group on Access and Benefit-Sharing of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Paris, 2–8 April. www.cbd. int/doc/?meeting=abswg-07. Accessed 26 May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • CITES (2004). Amendments to Appendices I and II of CITES. Proposal to the thirteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties, Bangkok, Thailand, 2–14 October. www.cites.org/common/ cop/13/raw_props/BW-NA-ZA- Hoodia.pdf. Accessed 7 April 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, N. R., Douwes, E., Wolfson, M. M., Smith, G. F., & Edwards, T. J. (2008). South Africa's bioprospecting, access and benefit-sharing legislation: current realities, future complications, and a proposed alternative. South African Journal of Science, 104, 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Trade Commission (2007). FTC Charges Marketers of ‘Hoodia’ Weight Loss Supplements with Deceptive Advertising, 27 April 2009. http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/04/nutraceuticals. shtm. Accessed 31 May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFPMA. (2006). Guidelines for IFPMA members on access to genetic resources and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of their utilization. International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations, 7 April. Geneva: Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • INA (2004). Expert Workshop Promoting CITES-CBD Cooperation and Synergy. International Academy for Nature Conservation, Isle of Vilm, Germany, 20–24 April. www.cbd.int/cooperation/ final-report-CITES CBD_Vilm_Workshop_Report.doc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marloth, R. (1932). The flora of South Africa, vol 3. Cape Town/London: Darter Bros/Wheldon & Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mupetami, L. (2007). Resource management and protection, Presentation to a conference on Hoodia, 22–23 February. Keetmanshoop, Namibia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nott, K., & Wynberg, R. (2008). Millenium challenge account Namibia compact, Volume 4: Thematic Analysis Report – Indigenous Natural Products, Namibia Strategic Environmental Assessment. Task order under the Project Development, Project Management, Environmental and General Engineering ID/IQ Contract no. MCC-06-0087-CON-90, Task Order No. 02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. (7 November 2006). Some business perspectives on the international regime. UK: GlaxoSmithKline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Miller, M., & Lapeña, I. (Eds.) (2007). A moving target: genetic resources and options for tracking and monitoring their international flows. IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 67/3, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Wynberg, R. (2008). Regulating access to South Africa's biodiversity and ensuring the fair sharing of benefits from its use. South African Journal of Environmental Science and Policy, 15(2), 217–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • UEBT (2007). BioTrade Verification Framework for Native Natural Ingredients – 2007–09–20. Union for Ethical BioTrade, Geneva. www.uebt.ch/dl/Engl-UEBT-Nat-Ingredients-Ver-framework-2007-09-20(rev1)b.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Adopted by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 61/295 on 13 September. www.un.org/esa/socdev/ unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNI–IAS (2008). Access to genetic resources in Africa: analysing ABS policy development in four African countries. Development Cooperation Ireland, United Nations Environment Programme, United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynberg, R., & Newton, D. (2008). A Policy and Trade Assessment for Hoodia spp. in Namibia, Botswana and South Africa. Unpublished report, Environmental Evaluation Unit, University of Cape Town and TRAFFIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynberg, R., & Taylor, M. (2009). Finding a path through the ABS maze: challenges of regulating access and ensuring fair benefit-sharing in South Africa. In E. C. Kamau & G. Winter (Eds.), Genetic resources, traditional knowledge and the law: solutions for access and benefit sharing. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Wynberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

We lost our culture, because the colonial governments came in and took over everything, now the younger generation don’t know our forefathers’ culture and traditions. It’s only a few of us elders who know about it. I am telling you I feel really sad, I just want to cry because we have lost our whole life. (Rosa #Gaeses, Etosha Poort, Outjo, Namibia)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wynberg, R. (2009). Policies for Sharing Benefits from Hoodia . In: Wynberg, R., Schroeder, D., Chennells, R. (eds) Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics