Abstract
This paper seeks to develop a theoretically based explanation of how it can be that commitments to principles of human rights can co-exist with indifference towards concrete human rights abuses. The paper opens with a discussion of a reflection by Jacques Maritain, one of the French delegates to the congresses which lead to the Universal Declaration. The argument moves on to suggest that indifference is an integral dimension of the human condition and that indifference is exacerbated by the dominance of a hermeneutical culture in modernity. It is proposed that since the hermeneutic culture is inescapable (and that escape from it is in any case dangerous and illicit), so indifference is also unavoidable. Social actors are faced with the problem of having to choose how to act morally in the conditions of this paradox.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Tester, Keith (2002) “A Theory of Indifference” Journal of Human Rights Volume 1, Number 2, pp. 173–186. Reprinted with permission of the Publisher (Taylor & Francis, http://www.informaworld.com).
- 2.
Maritain (1954).
- 3.
Ibid., 69–70.
- 4.
MacIntyre (1985).
- 5.
Ibid., 263.
- 6.
Maritain (1954), Man and the State, 72.
- 7.
- 8.
Arendt (1958).
- 9.
Weber (1968).
- 10.
This tendency is only partly avoided in Heller (1990).
- 11.
It is possible to read Zygmunt Bauman’s important sociology of adiaphorization as a study of the transformation of the potential Thou into It, The social manipulation of morality: moralizing actors, adiaphorizing action. Bauman (1991).
- 12.
This involves the strategy of “blaming the victim”. For more on this see Tester (2001).
- 13.
Arendt (1958), The Human Condition, A Study of the Central Dilemmas Facing Modern Man, 10.
- 14.
Simmel (1950).
- 15.
This is a point which is stressed in Weber (1968). Typology of social action which is, itself, explicit within the sociological account of morality that underpins and informs this paper.
- 16.
Maritain (1954), Man and the State, 73.
- 17.
Feher (1989).
- 18.
Ibid., 79, 84.
- 19.
Heller and Ferenc (1988).
- 20.
Feher (1989, 81).
- 21.
Ibid., 83.
- 22.
Ibid.
- 23.
Ibid., 88.
- 24.
Ibid.
- 25.
Ibid.
- 26.
Ibid., 89.
- 27.
Ibid.
- 28.
Ibid., 91.
- 29.
And, as MacIntyre (1985) points out, the elevation of preference to ethical importance heralds the condition of emotivism.
- 30.
Bauman (2000).
References
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition, A Study of the Central Dilemmas Facing Modern Man, 9 & 10. New York: Doubleday.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1991. The social manipulation of morality: Moralizing actors, adiaphorizing action. Theory, Culture & Society 8, 137–151.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity, 29. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Feher, Ferenc. 1989. Hermeneutic as Europe’s mainstream political tradition. In Thesis Eleven, no 22, 79–91.
Heller, Agnes and Ferenc Feher. 1988. The Postmodern Political Condition, 147. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heller, Agnes. 1990. Can Modernity Survive?. Cambridge: Polity Press (important development of the theme).
Maritain, Jacques. 1954. Man and the State, 70. Original emphasis, London: Hollis & Carter.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1985. After Virtue, A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.
Mestrovic, Stjepan. 1997. Postemotional Society. London: Sage.
Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, ed. and trans. Kurt H. Wolff. New York: Free Press.
Tester, Keith.1997. Moral Culture. London: Sage.
Tester, Keith. 2001. Compassion, Morality and the Media. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society, An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 1, eds. G. Roth and C. Wittich. New York: Bedminster Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tester, K. (2010). A Theory of Indifference1 . In: Ognjenovic, G. (eds) Responsibility in Context. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3037-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3037-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3036-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3037-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)