A Novel Blind Deconvolution De-Noising Scheme in Failure Prognosis
- 1.3k Downloads
With increased system complexity, Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) becomes a promising solution to system safety by detecting faults and scheduling maintenance procedures before faults become severe failures resulting in catastrophic events. For CBM of many mechanical systems, fault diagnosis and failure prognosis based on vibration signal analysis are essential techniques. Noise originating from various sources, however, often corrupts vibration signals and degrades the performance of diagnostic and prognostic routines, and consequently, the performance of CBM. In this paper, a new de-noising structure is proposed and applied to vibration signals collected from a testbed of the main gearbox of a helicopter subjected to a seeded fault. The proposed structure integrates a blind deconvolution algorithm, feature extraction, failure prognosis, and vibration modeling into a syn-ergistic system, in which the blind deconvolution algorithm attempts to arrive at the true vibration signal through an iterative optimization process. Performance indexes associated with quality of the extracted features and failure prognosis are addressed, before and after de-noising, for validation purposes.
KeywordsFault Diagnosis Vibration Signal Blind Source Separation Planetary Gear Blind Deconvolution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.G. Vachtsevanos, F. Lewis, M. Roemer, A. Hess and B. Wu, Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems, Wiley, 2006.Google Scholar
- 2.A. Saxena, B. Wu and G. Vachtsevanos, A methodology for analyzing vibration data from planetary gear system using complex morelt wavelets, in Proceedings of American Control Conference, Portland, OR, June, Vol. 7, pp. 4730–4735, 2005.Google Scholar
- 3.B. Wu, A. Saxena, T. Khawaja, R. Patrick, G. Vachtsevanos and R. Sparis, An approach to fault diagnosis of helicopter planetary gears, in Proceedings of IEEE AUTOTESTCON, San Antonio, TX, September pp. 475–481, 2004.Google Scholar
- 4.B. Wu, R.P.A. Saxena and G. Vachtsevanos, Vibration monitoring for fault diagnosis of helicopter planetary gears, in Proceedings of IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, July 2005.Google Scholar
- 5.M. Lebold, K. McClintic, R. Campbell, C. Byington and K. Maynard, Review of vibration analysis methods for gearbox diagnostics and prognostics, in Proceedings of 54th Meeting of the Society for Machineary Failure Prevention Technology, Virgina Beach, VA, May, pp. 623– 634, 2000.Google Scholar
- 6.J. Keller and P. Grabill, Vibration monitoring of a UH-60A main transmission planetary carrier faul, in Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 59th Annual Forum, Phoenix, AZ, May, pp. 1–11, 2003.Google Scholar
- 9.R. Patrick, A model-based framework for fault diagnosis and prognosis of dynamical system with an application to helicopter transmissions, PhD Proposal, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, September 2006.Google Scholar
- 10.M. Orchard, A particle filtering-based framework for on-line fault diagnosis and failure prognosis, PhD Proposal, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2006.Google Scholar