Advertisement

Questioning Relevance

  • Mark RickinsonEmail author
  • Cecilia Lundholm
  • Nick Hopwood
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the second of the three lenses we have used to look across the data generated in our three studies. Here we look at or for issues to do with relevance, and consider how these are manifest in environmental learning processes from the perspective of learners. We explore a range of environmental learning experiences and learners’ comments on these experiences. This analysis pursues two related themes: the first explores how environmental learning may (or may not) be conceived as relevant to learners themselves, while the second considers learners’ perceptions of the relevance of environmental learning to particular curricular contexts. Finally we reflect on what this lens shows us, linking back to the issues and themes discussed in the chapter titled “What Is Environmental Learning?”, and outlining key points which are developed further in the chapter titled “Enhancing Environmental Learning”.

Keywords

Environmental Learning Environmental Issue Environmental Education Tropical Rainforest School Subject 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Battersby J (1999) Does environmental education have ’street credibility’ and the potential to reduce pupil disaffection within and beyond their school curriculum? Cambridge J Educ 29(3):447–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandt CB (2007) Using landscape to explore the relationships between epistemology and place in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 9–13 AprilGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooks C (2003) Investigating the geography behind the news. Teach Geogr 28(2):70–73Google Scholar
  4. Cooper P, McIntyre D (1993) Commonality in teachers’ and pupils’ perceptions of effective classroom learning. Br J Educ Psychol 63:381–399Google Scholar
  5. Lord P (2001) Pupils’ experiences and perspectives of the National Curriculum: updating the research review 2000–2001. QCA, London. http://www.qca.org.uk/4831.html. Accessed 6 August
  6. Marton F (1994) Phenomenography. In: Husen T, Postlethwaite TN (eds) The international encyclopedia of education. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Reid A, Nikel J (2008) Differentiating and evaluating conceptions and examples of participation in environment-related learning. In: Reid A, Jensen BB, Nikel J, Simovska V (eds) Participation and learning: perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability. Springer, DortrechtGoogle Scholar
  8. Schindler G (1993) The Environment and School Initiatives (ENSI). II: the conflict. Educ Action Res 1(3):457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schoenfeld AH (2004) Multiple learning communities: students, teachers, instructional designers, and researchers. J Curriculum Stud 36(2):237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Songer NB, Linn MC (1991) How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? J Res Sci Teach 28(9):761–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Whatmore S (1999) Culture-nature. In: Cloke P, Crang P, Goodwin M (eds) Introducing human geographies. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Whatmore S (2003) Hybrid geographies. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Rickinson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cecilia Lundholm
    • 2
  • Nick Hopwood
    • 3
  1. 1.Oxford University and Policy Studies InstituteWallingfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Education and Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Centre for Excellence in Preparing for Academic PracticeOxford Learning InstituteOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations