Advertisement

Dealing with Emotions and Values

  • Mark RickinsonEmail author
  • Cecilia Lundholm
  • Nick Hopwood
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter looks at environmental learning through a lens that focuses on students’ values and emotions. We focus initially on the ways in which students deal with their own emotions and values when undertaking environmental learning activities. We then explore how students’ perceptions of environmental subject matter as value-laden or otherwise can affect their learning. It should be added that while emotions and values are the primary focus of this chapter, they also emerge as part of later discussions concerning relevance (the chapter titled “Questioning Relevance”) and student–teacher relations (the chapter titled “Negotiating Viewpoints Among Students and Teachers”).

Keywords

Environmental Learning Subject Matter Emotional Response Conceptual Change Epistemological Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Claxton G (1989) Educating the inquiring mind. Harvester Wheatsheaf, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Claxton G (1991) Cognition doesn’t matter if you’re scared, depressed or bored. In: Adey P (ed) Adolescent development and school science. Falmer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Edwards D, Mercer N (1987) Common knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Elliot J (1995) Reconstructing the environmental education curriculum: teachers’ perspectives. In: OECD (ed) Environmental learning for the 21st century. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Gutierrez de White T, Jacobson SK (1994) Evaluating conservation education programs at a South American zoo. J Envir Educ 25(4):18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaplan S (1985) Cognition and affect in environmental learning. Child Environ Q 2(3):19–21Google Scholar
  7. Lundholm C (2007) Pricing nature at what price? A study on undergraduate students’ conceptions of economics. S Afr J Environ Educ 24:126–140Google Scholar
  8. Lundholm C (2008) Contextualisation and learning in economics: an intentional perspective on the role of values. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Conceptual Change, European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Turku, 22–25 AugustGoogle Scholar
  9. Mason L, Santi M (1998) Discussing the greenhouse effect: children’s collaborative discourse reasoning and conceptual change. Environ Educ Res 4(1):67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgan J, Lambert D (2005) Geography: teaching school subjects 11–19. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Palmer JA (1998) Environmental education in the 21st century: theory, practice, progress and promise. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Pollard A (2003) Learning through life—higher education and the lifecourse. In: Watson D, Slowey M (eds) Higher education and the lifecourse. SRHE, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  13. Shapiro BL (1994) What children bring to light: a constructivist perspective on children’s learning in science. Teachers College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Sinatra G, Pintrich P (eds) (2003) Intentional conceptual change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith-Sebasto NJ, Walker LM (2005) Toward a grounded theory for residential environmental education: a case study of the New Jersey school of conservation. J Environ Educ 37(1):27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stanton G (2006) D&R programmes: concepts and practice. NERF Working Paper 5.6. National Educational Research Forum (NERF): LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Watts M, Alsop S (1997) A feeling for learning: modelling affective learning in school science. Curriculum J 8(3):351–365Google Scholar
  18. Zeidler DL (ed) (2003) The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  19. Zeidler D, Walker K, Ackett W, Simmons M (2002) Tangled up in views: beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Sci Educ 86(3):343–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Rickinson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cecilia Lundholm
    • 2
  • Nick Hopwood
    • 3
  1. 1.Oxford University and Policy Studies InstituteWallingfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Education and Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Centre for Excellence in Preparing for Academic PracticeOxford Learning InstituteOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations