• Mark RickinsonEmail author
  • Cecilia Lundholm
  • Nick Hopwood


This book is about how school and university students experience and respond to learning activities concerned with environmental issues. While the learning demands associated with sustainable development become ever greater and more complex, our understandings of the nature and dynamics of such learning are in their early infancy. Environmental education and education for sustainable development have become features of many countries’ formal education systems, but very little is known about what such provision looks and feels like for the learners concerned. The aim of this book is to bring learners and their experiences to the centre of current debates about environmental education and education for sustainable development. By exploring the real-time actions, interactions and interpretations of individual learners in various environmental learning situations, we show how insights from research into the student experience can provide powerful pointers for future practice, policy and research. The last 4 decades have seen growing international recognition for the educational dimensions of environmental and sustainable development issues. Since the late 1960s, international statements from organisations such as the IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) and UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation) have called for environmental problems to be tackled through environmental education for all age groups. The 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm declared that: ‘education in environmental matters, for the younger generation as well as adults […] is essential’ (United Nation 1972).


Sustainable Development Environmental Learning Environmental Education United Nations Educational Research Environmental Learn 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ballantyne R, Packer J (2002) Nature-based excursions: school students’ perceptions of learning in natural environments. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 11(3):218–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks F, McCormick B (2005) A case study of the inter-relationship between science and technology: England 1984–2004. Paper presented at the 15th International Pupil Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT) Conference, Haarlem, the Netherlands, 18–22 AprilGoogle Scholar
  3. Brody M, Tomkiewicz W (2002) Park visitors’ understandings, values and beliefs related to their experience at Midway Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, USA. Int J Sci Educ 24(11):1119–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corney G (2000) Student geography teachers’ pre-conceptions about teaching environmental topics. Environ Educ Res 6(4):313–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dole JA, Sinatra GM (1998) Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educ Psychol 33(2/3):109–128Google Scholar
  6. Driver R (1983) The pupil as scientist?. Open University Press, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliot J (1995) Reconstructing the environmental education curriculum: teachers’ perspectives. In: OECD (ed) Environmental learning for the 21st century. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Erickson F, Shultz J (1992) Students’ experience of the curriculum. In: Jackson PW (ed) Handbook of research on curriculum. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Ertl H, Hayward G, Wright S, Edwards A, Lunt I, Mills D & Yu K (2007) The student learning experience in higher education. Literature review report for the Higher Education Academy. Accessed 10 November 2008 from
  10. Estabrooks CA (2001) Research utilization and qualitative research. In: Morse JM, Sawnson JM, Kuzel AJ (eds) The nature of qualitative evidence. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Falk JH (2005) Free-choice environmental learning: framing the discussion. Environ Educ Res 11(3):265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fourth International Conference on Environmental Education (2007) Moving forward from Ahmebadad … environmental education in the 21st century. Accessed 28 November 2008 from
  13. Grace MM, Ratcliffe M (2002) The science and values that young people draw upon to make decision about biological conservation issues. Int J Sci Educ 24(11):1157–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halldén O, Haglund L, Strömdahl H (2007) Conceptions and contexts: on the interpretation of interview and observational data. Educ Psychol 42(1):25–40Google Scholar
  15. Hart P (2007) Desires and resistances as drivers and barriers to environmental learning and sustainability: a Canadian perspective. In: Bjorneloo I, Nyberg E (eds) Drivers and barriers for implementing learning for sustainable development in pre-school through upper secondary and teacher education. ESD in action technical paper No 4. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Hopwood N (2006) Pupils’ conceptions of school geography: a classroom based investigation. DPhil dissertation, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopwood N (2007a) Environmental education: pupils’ perspectives on classroom experience. Environ Educ Res 13(4):453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hopwood N (2007b) Pupils’ conceptions of geography: issues for debate. In: Halocha J, Powell A (eds) Conceptualising geographical education. International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education/Institute of Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Hopwood N (2007c) Researcher roles in a school-based ethnography. In: Walford G (ed) Studies in educational ethnography, Volume 12: methodological developments in ethnography. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopwood N (2008) Values in geographic education: the challenge of attending to learners’ perspectives. Oxf Rev Educ 34(5):589–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopwood N (forthcoming) UK high school pupils’ conceptions of geography: research findings and methodological implications. Int Res Geogr Environ EducGoogle Scholar
  22. Knamiller G (1983) Environmental education for relevance in developing countries. Environ 3(3):173–179Google Scholar
  23. Lam C-C, Lai E (2003) ‘What is geography?’ In the eyes of junior secondary students in Hong Kong. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 12(3):199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lundholm C (2003) Att lära om miljö. Forskar- och högskolestuderandes tolkningar av ett miljöinnehåll i utbildningen/ Learning about environmental issues. Undergraduate and postgraduate students’ interpretations of environmental content. Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundholm C (2004a) Case studies – exploring students’ meaning and elaborating learning theories. Environ Educ Res 10(1):115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lundholm C (2004b) Learning about environmental issues in engineering programmes. A case study of first-year civil engineering students’ contextualisations of an ecology course. Int J Sustainability High Educ 5(3):295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lundholm C (2005) Learning about environmental issues: undergraduate and postgraduate students’ interpretations of environmental content. Int J Sustainability High Educ 6(3):242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lundholm C (2007) Pricing nature at what price? A study on undergraduate students’ conceptions of economics. S Afr J Environ Educ 24:126–140Google Scholar
  29. Nespor J (1987) Academic tasks in a high school English class. Curriculum Inq 17(2):202–228Google Scholar
  30. Österlind K (2005) Concept formation in environmental education: 14-year-olds’ work on the intensified greenhouse effect and the depletion of the ozone layer. Int J Sci Educ 27(8):891–908Google Scholar
  31. Payne P (1998) Children’s conceptions of nature. Aust J Environ Educ 14:19–26Google Scholar
  32. Rickinson M (1999) The teaching and learning of environmental issues through geography: a classroom-based study. D.Phil. dissertation, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Rickinson M (1999b) People-environment issues in the geography classroom: towards an understanding of students’ experiences. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 8(2):120–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rickinson M (2006) Researching and understanding environmental learning: hopes for the next ten years. Environ Educ Res 12(3/4):445–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rickinson M, Lundholm C (2008) Exploring students’ learning in environmental education. Cambridge J Educ 38(3):341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rickinson M, Dillon J, Teamey K, Morris M, Choi M, Sanders D, Benefield P (2004) A review of research on outdoor learning. Field Studies Council, ShrewsburyGoogle Scholar
  37. Sadler TD, Donnelly LA (2006) Socioscientific argumentation: the effect of content knowledge and morality. Int J Sci Educ 28(12):1463–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shanahan M, Meyer JHF (2006) The troublesome nature of a threshold concept in economics. In: Meyer J, Land R (eds) Overcoming barriers to student understanding: threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Sterling S (2004) The learning of ecology, or the ecology of learning? In: Scott W, Gough S (eds) Key issues in sustainable development and learning: a critical review. RoutledgeFalmer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Stradling R, Noctor M, Baines B (1984) Teaching controversial issues. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. UNESCO (1975) The Belgrade charter. A global framework for environmental education. . Accessed 12 September 2008
  42. UNESCO (1978) Intergovernmental conference on environmental education, Tbilisi (USSR) 24–26 October 1977. Final report. Accessed 12 September 2008
  43. UNESCO (2005) United Nations decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2014): international implementation scheme. . Accessed 9 September 2008
  44. UNESCO (2007) Highlights on Decade of Education for Sustainable Development progress to date. . Accessed 12 October 2008
  45. United Nations (1972) Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment. Accessed 28 November 2008
  46. Wals A (ed) (2007) Social learning towards a sustainable world. Wageningen Academic Publishers, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  47. Watts M, Alsop S (1997) A feeling for learning: modelling affective learning in school science. Curriculum J 8(3):351–365Google Scholar
  48. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Rickinson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cecilia Lundholm
    • 2
  • Nick Hopwood
    • 3
  1. 1.Oxford University and Policy Studies InstituteWallingfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Education and Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Centre for Excellence in Preparing for Academic PracticeOxford Learning InstituteOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations