Abstract
In the historical development of classical Confucian philosophy, the two brief treatises known as Daxue 大學 (Great Learning) and Zhongyong 中庸 (Doctrine of the Mean) are among the most important milestones marking the transition of Confucian thought, from the kernels of ancient wisdom encapsulated in the early canonic writings: The Shujing 書經 (Classic of Documents), The Yijing易經 (Classic of Changes) and The Shijing 詩經 (Classic of Poetry) together with the diffuse ethical teachings set forth in the name of Confucius in the Lunyu 論語 (The Analects), toward the gradual emergence of Confucianism as a spiritually profound and intellectually complex philosophical system. In this light, their position as foundational documents in the history of classical Chinese thought parallels that of the Platonic Dialogues in transforming the diffuse concepts of the pre-Socratics into a unified mode of philosophical inquiry. Alongside the related integral arguments presented in the pre-Qin writings attributed to Mencius and Xunzi, now supplemented by a handful of independent treatises outside of the received tradition that have been rediscovered among the archaeological treasures unearthed in China in recent years (including such texts as those known under the titles: Taiyi sheng shui太一生水 (The Great One Gave Birth to Water), Xing zi ming chu性自命出 (Nature comes from Mandate), Hengxian恆先 (The Constant Precedes), and Wuxingpian五行篇 (Five Actions), these works set the terms of discourse and the modes of argumentation that gradually crystallized through the centuries from Han through Tang to form the primary discourse of the Confucian strain of early Chinese thought. Ultimately, these works came to provide the core ideas and issues of the great revival of Confucian thought, in response to the profound spiritual challenge of Buddhist philosophy, that took shape during the Northern and Southern Song periods (a movement conventionally known in contemporary Sinological writings as “Neo-Confucianism”), and continued to dominate intellectual life in China through the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, down to the end of imperial period and beyond.
References
Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. A sourcebook in Chinese philosophy, The great learning, 84–94. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gardner, Daniel K. 1986. Chu Hsi and the Ta Hsueh: Neo-Confucian reflection on the Confucian canon. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Close reading of Daxue text based on textual commentaries of Zhu Xi.
Graham, A.C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical argument in ancient China. La Salle: Open Court. General survey of early Chinese thought from the perspective of polemical discourse among different “schools”.
Henderson, John B. 1991. Scripture, canon, and commentary: A comparison of Confucian and western exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. First comprehensive study of Confucian textual commentary.
Hu, Zhikui 胡志奎. 1984. Evidential explication of Daxue and Zhongyong 學庸辨證. Taipei: Linking Publishing House. (Study of primary textual issues regarding Daxue and Zhongyong).
Hughes, E.R. 1943. The great learning and the mean-in action. New York: E. P. Dutton. Translation of Daxue and Zhongyong with running commentary by author.
Lau, D.C. 1967. A note on Ke-Wu. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 30: 353–357. New philological approach to the meaning of the key term gewu.
Legge, James. 1923. The four books. Shanghai. (Reprint, New York: Paragon Books, 1966). (“classic” English translations of basic Confucian canons).
Loewe, Michael. 1993. Early Chinese texts: A bibliographical guide. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies.
Nivison, David S. 1996. The ways of Confucianism. La Salle: Open Court. Good introduction to the different streams of early confucian thought.
Nylan, Michael. 2001. The five Confucian classics. New Haven: Yale University Press. Broad introduction to textual history and intellectual significance of the “Five Classics”.
Riegel, Jeffrey. 1978. The Four Tzu Ssu chapters of the Li Chi: An analysis and translation. Stanford: Stanford University dissertation. (argument for interpretation of key chapters in Liji based on their presumed common authorship)
Schwartz, Benjamin. 1989. The world of thought in ancient China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. General survey of early Chinese philosophy.
Tang, Junyi 唐君毅. 1973. Treatise on Chinese philosophy 中國哲學原論, Hong Kong: New Asia College. (Penetrating discussions of central issues in traditional Chinese thought).
Tu, Wei-ming. 1989. Centrality and commonality: An essay on Chung Yung. New York: State University Press. Translation of Zhongyong with embedded commentary by author.
Twichett, Denis, and Michael Loewe. 1986. Cambridge history of China – Ch’in and Han. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Xu, Fuguan 徐復觀. 1963. History of Chinese theories of human nature 中國人性論史. Taizhong: Donghai University Press. (Comprehensive review of discussions on topic of essential human nature in classic Chinese thought).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plaks, A.H. (2014). The Daxue (Great Learning) and the Zhongyong (Doctrine of the Mean). In: Shen, V. (eds) Dao Companion to Classical Confucian Philosophy. Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2936-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2936-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2935-5
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2936-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)