Veterinary Medicinal Products in Manures and Soils - Problems and Solutions

Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

In order to improve the prospective evaluation of veterinary medicinal products (VMP), a technical guidance for laboratory tests on degradation in liquid manures and degradation and sorption in manured soils has been developed. Since the representative and reproducible sampling of manure from high-volume tanks is regarded impossible, an innovative research concept has been developed. First, excrement samples of cattle and pigs individually kept at an experimental stable were taken. These samples were thoroughly matrix characterized. Then, tap water was added to prepare reference manures of defined dry substance contents. Subsequently, the long-term degradation of VMP applied as 14C-labeled radiotracers was investigated in those manure samples. On the basis of the degradation tests, test manures with 7-day aged VMP residues were prepared and applied in laboratory tests on degradation and sorption in manured soils. By means of this experimental approach, the impacts of aging processes during manure storage and of the manure matrix on the fate of VMP in soils can be assessed already under laboratory conditions.

Keywords

liquid manure degradation manure soils degradation test 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Federal Biological Research Center for Agriculture and Forestry (1998) Data requirement and criteria for decision making in the European Union and the Federal Republic of Germany for the authorization procedure of plant protection products. Mitt Biol Bundesanst, 358, 1–180.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of 18 December 2006 concerning the registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals (REACH).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Commission (1998) Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Off. J. EC, L 123/1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gesetz über den Verkehr mit Arzneimitteln (2007) BGBl I, 2631.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicines (1998) Environmental risk assessment for veterinary medicinal products other than GMO containing and immunological products. EMEA/CVMP/055/96-FINAL.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    International cooperation on harmonization of technical requirements for authorization of veterinary medicinal products (2000) Environmental impact assessment (EIAs) for veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) — Phase I. VICH GL6, Ecotoxicity Phase I. Bruxelles, Belgium.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    International cooperation on harmonization of technical requirements for authorization of veterinary medicinal products (2003) Environmental impact assessment (EIAs) for veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) — Phase II. VICH GL38, Ecotoxicity Phase II. Bruxelles, Belgium.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spaepen K, Van Leemput L, Wislocki P, Verschueren C (1997) A uniform procedure to estimate the predicted environmental concentration of the residues of veterinary medicines in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem, 16, 1977–1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kreuzig R, Höltge S. (2005) Investigations on the fate of sulfadiazine in manured soil: Laboratory experiments and test plot studies. Environ Toxicol Chem, 24, 260–265.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Höltge S, Kreuzig R. (2007) Laboratory testing of sulfamethoxazole and its metabolite acetyl-sulfamethoxazole in soil. Clean, 35, 104–110.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kreuzig R, Blümlein K, Höltge S (2007) Fate of the benzimidazole antiparasitics flubenda-zole and fenbendazole in manure and manured soils. Clean, 35, 488–494.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    German Ordinance Concerning Fertilizers (2006) BGBI 181.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kreuzig R, Höltge S, Heise J, Schmanteck I, Stein F, Batarseh M (2007) Veterinary medicinal products in manures and manured soils: Development of a technical protocol for laboratory tests. UBA-Texte 45/07, ISSN 1862-4804. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin, 1–142. http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3343.pdf.
  14. 14.
    Kreuzig R, Heise J, Höltge S (2006) Das Gülle-Projekt: Ausarbeitung eines Methodenkataloges zur Untersuchung des Rückstandsverhaltens von Tierarzneimitteln in Gülle und Boden. Mitt Umweltchem Ökotox, 12, 39–43.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kreuzig R, Kullmer C, Mathies B, Höltge S, Dieckmann H (2003) Fate and behaviour of pharmaceutical residues in soils. Fresenius Environ Bull, 12, 550–558.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    OECD (1981) Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. Inherent Biodegradability in Soil. Guideline 304 A. Paris, France, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    OECD (2002): Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. Aerobic and Anaerobic Degradation in Soil. 307, OECD, France, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    OECD (1981b): Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. Adsorption/Desorption. OECD, France, 106, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    OECD (2000): Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. Adsorption-Desorption Using a Batch Equilibrium Method. 106, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kreuzig R, Höltge S, Stein F, Batarseh M (2007) Zum Rückstandsverhalten von Veterinärpharmaka in Gülle und Boden: Eine Herausforderung an Labortestsysteme. Münchener Beiträge zur Abwasser-, Fischerei- und Flußbiologie. Oldenburg-Verlag. pp. 135–154.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fichter PM, Holden PW (1992) A field study to meet United States Environmental Protection Agency regulatory for measurement of movement of pesticides to ground water. Brighton Crop Protect Conf Pests and Diseases, 7C (15), 853–858.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Ecological Chemistry and Waste Analysis, Hagenring 30Technische Universitaet BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations