Abstract
In this excellent paper written with much historical comprehension and philosophical penetration, Dr. Fulton discusses Husserl’s claim that phenomenology may be characterized as a Neo-Cartesianism, although nearly all of the doctrinal content of Cartesianism is rejected, and this because of a radical development given to certain Cartesian themes. Is this “doctrinal content” truly accessory, so that, when it is dismissed, the real and essential principles of Cartesian philosophy become all the more manifest and may be set forth even more explicitly than they are in the form in which Descartes brought them out himself? Or is the “doctrinal content” so closely connected with the general orientation of Descartes’ thought that, when those “Cartesian themes” which Husserl retains and endeavors to develop are considered in the light of Descartes’ supreme philosophical aspirations, they cannot be separated from that “doctrinal content”?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gurwitsch, A. (2010). James Street Fulton, “The Cartesianism of Phenomenology,” The Philosophical Review, Vol. XLIX (1940), pp. 285–308. In: García-Gómez, J. (eds) The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973). Phaenomenologica, vol 192. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2831-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2831-0_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2830-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2831-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)