Skip to main content

Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand-level management of plantation forests

  • Chapter
Plantation Forests and Biodiversity: Oxymoron or Opportunity?

Abstract

Identification of valid indicators of biodiversity is a critical need for sustainable forest management. We developed compositional, structural and functional indicators of biodiversity for five taxonomic groups—bryophytes, vascular plants, spiders, hoverflies and birds—using data from 44 Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior) plantation forests in Ireland. The best structural biodiversity indicator was stand stage, defined using a multivariate classification of forest structure variables. However, biodiversity trends over the forest cycle and between tree species differ among the taxonomic groups studied. Canopy cover was the main structural indicator and affected other structural variables such as cover of lower vegetation layers. Other structural indicators included deadwood and distances to forest edge and to broadleaved woodland. Functional indicators included stand age, site environmental characteristics and management practices. Compositional indicators were limited to more easily identifiable plant and bird species. Our results suggest that the biodiversity of any one of the species groups we surveyed cannot act as a surrogate for all of the other species groups. However, certain subgroups, such as forest bryophytes and saproxylic hoverflies, may be able to act as surrogates for each other. The indicators we have identified should be used together to identify stands of potentially high biodiversity or to evaluate the biodiversity effects of silvicultural management practices. They are readily assessed by non-specialists, ecologically meaningful and applicable over a broad area with similar climate conditions and silvicultural systems. The approach we have used to develop biodiversity indicators, including stand structural types, is widely relevant and can enhance sustainable forest management of plantations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CWD:

Coarse woody debris

Dbh:

Diameter at breast height (1.3 m)

GPS:

Geographical positioning system

IndVal:

Indicator value

NMS:

Non-metric multidimensional scaling

PCA:

Principal components analysis

Se:

Standard error

SR:

Species richness

References

  • Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Rowland AP (1986) Chemical analysis. In: Moore PD, Chapman SB (eds) Methods in plant ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 285–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand M, Laurence S, Rayfield B (2005) Diversity relationships among taxonomic groups in recovering and restored forests. Conserv Biol 19:955–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson MD (1992) Biological flora of the British isles: Betula pendula Roth (B. verrucosa ehrh.) and B. pubescens Ehrh. J Ecol 80:837–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaman M (1994) Palearctic birds. Harrier, Stonyhurst

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg Å, Ehnström B, Gustafsson L et al (1994) Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conserv Biol 8:718–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibby C, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1992) Bird census techniques. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJ, Bain CG, Burges DJ (1989) Bird communities of highland birchwoods. Bird Study 36:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockerhoff EG, Ecroyd CE, Leckie AC et al (2003) Diversity and succession of adventive and indigenous vascular understorey plants in Pinus radiata plantation forests in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 185:307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombes RH, Crowe O, Lysaght L et al (2002) Countryside bird survey report 1998–2000. Bird Watch Ireland, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross JR (1998) An outline and map of the potential natural vegetation of Ireland. Appl Veg Sci 1:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie FA, Balmford R (1982) The value to birdlife of retaining small conifer stands beyond normal felling age within forests. Q J For 76:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis D (1980) Pitfalls in spider community studies. J Arach 8:271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Day KR, Marshall S, Heaney C (1993) Associations between forest type and invertebrates: ground beetle community patterns in a natural oakwood and juxtaposed conifer plantations. Forestry 66:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis P, Young M, Gordon I (1998) Distribution and abundance of small insects and arachnids in relation to structural heterogeneity of grazed, indigenous grasslands. Ecol Entomol 23:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlaeminck R, Bossuyt B, Hermy M (2005) Seed dispersal from a forest into adjacent cropland. Agric Ecosys Environ 107:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy BL, O’Halloran J, Kelly TCK et al (1997) The breeding bird communities of Balrath wood, Co. Meath, 1996: a preliminary investigation. Ir For 54:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetric approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén J, Eriksson O (2000) Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81:1667–1674

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmark O, Hytteborn H (1999) Coniferous forests. Acta Phytogeogr Suec 84:55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Eycott AE, Watkinson AR, Dolman PM (2006) Ecological patterns of plant diversity in a plantation forest managed by clearfelling. J Appl Ecol 43:1160–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahy O, Gormally M (1998) A comparison of plant and beetle communities in an Irish oak woodland with a nearby by conifer plantation and clearfelled site. For Ecol Manage 110:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris R, Humphrey JW (1999) A review of potential biodiversity indicators for application in British forests. Forestry 72:313–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris R, Peace AJ, Humphrey JW, et al (2000) Relationships between vegetation, site type and stand structure in coniferous plantations in Britain. For Ecol Manage 136:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forest Service (2000a) Afforestation grant and premium schemes. Forest Service, Johnstown Castle

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Service (2000b) Code of best forest practice– Ireland. Forest Service, Johnstown Castle

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Service (2000c) Forest biodiversity guidelines. Forest Service, Johnstown Castle

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Service (2006) Forest environment protection (afforestation) scheme. Forest Service, Johnstown Castle

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission (2004) The UK forestry standard. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • French LJ, Smith GF, Kelly DL et al (in press) Ground flora communities in temperate oceanic plantation forests and the influence of silvicultural, geographic and edaphic factors. For Ecol Manage

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1996) Species richness: measure and measurement. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Biodiversity: a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 396

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone M (1984) Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity vs. prey availability. Oecologia 62:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern CB, Spies TA (1995) Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific northwest. Ecol Appl 5:913–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden T, Harrington R (2001) Exploring Irish mammals. Town House, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1979) The development of flora in even-aged plantations. In: Ford ED, Malcolm DC, Atterson J (eds) The ecology of even aged plantations. Institute for Terrestrial Ecology, Cambridge, pp 175–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Jones EW (1978) Vegetation changes resulting from afforestation of rough grazing in Caeo Forest, South Wales. J Ecol 66:433–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge SJ, Peterken GF (1998) Deadwood in British forests: Priorities and a strategy. Forestry 71:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard PC, Viskanic P, Davenport TRB et al (1998) Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394:472–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW (2005) Benefits to biodiversity from developing old-growth conditions in British upland spruce plantations: a review and recommendations. Forestry 78:33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW, Davey S, Peace AJ et al (2002) Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the influence of site type, stand structure and deadwood. Biol Conserv 107:165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW, Hawes C, Peace AJ et al (1999) Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests. For Ecol Manage 113:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW, Newton AC, Peace AJ et al (2000) The importance of conifer plantations in northern Britain as a habitat for native fungi. Biol Conserv 96:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW, Peace AJ (2003) Deadwood. In: Humphrey J, Ferris R, Quine C (eds) Biodiversity in Britain’s planted forests. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, pp 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Iremonger S, Gittings T, Smith GF et al (2006) Investigation of experimental methods to enhance biodiversity in plantation forests. Report for COFORD and EPA, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Iremonger S, O’Halloran J, Kelly DL et al (2007) Biodiversity in Irish plantation forests. Environmental Protection Agency, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones EW (1959) Biological flora of the British isles: Quercus L. J Ecol 47:169–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson BG, Jonsell M (1999) Exploring potential biodiversity indicators in boreal forests. Biodivers Cons 8:1417–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Devillers P, Dufrêne M, et al (2004) Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conserv Biol 18:667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DL (1981) The native forest vegetation of Killarney, south-west Ireland: an ecological account. J Ecol 69:437–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DL (2005) Woodland on the western fringe: Irish oakwood diversity and the challenges of conservation. Bot J Scot 57:21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key RS (1995) Invertebrate conservation and new woodland in Britain. In: Ferris-Kaan R (ed) The ecology of woodland creation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson T-B (2001) Biodiversity evaluation tools for European forests. Ecological bulletins, vol 50. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B et al (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391:72–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Developments in environmental modelling, vol 20. 2nd English edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppäniemi P, Hallikainen V, Mikkola K et al (1998) Forest structure classes in central Finnish Lapland. Scand J For Res 13:442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB (1999) Future directions for biodiversity conservation in managed forests: indicator species, impact studies and monitoring programs. For Ecol Manage 115:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF, Fischer J (2006) General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 131:433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin DB (2000) Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv Biol 14:941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1997) PC-ORD for Windows, version 4.25. MjM Software, Glenedon Beach, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny C, Gibbons P, Brack C et al (2005) Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. For Ecol Manage 218:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNett B, Rypstra A (2000) Habitat selection in a large orb-weaving spider: vegetational complexity determines site selection and distribution. Ecol Entomol 25:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Negi HR, Gadgil M (2002) Cross-taxon surrogacy of biodiversity in the Indian Garhwal Himalaya. Biol Conserv 105:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemela J, Haila Y, Punttila P (1996) The importance of small-scale heterogeneity in boreal forest-floor invertebrates across the succession gradient. Ecography 19:352–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi GJ, McDonald ME (2004) Application of ecological indicators. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1999) Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: a suggested framework and indicators. For Ecol Manage 115:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran J, Gittings T, Smith GF et al (2004) Biodiversity of plantation forests in Ireland: Bioforest project. In: MacLennan L (ed) Opportunities for Biodiversity Enhancement in Plantation Forests. COFORD, Dublin, Cork, pp 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran J, Walsh PM, Giller PS et al (1999) An assessment of avian biodiversity and opportunities for enhancement in Ireland’s forests: preliminary results. Ir For 55:2–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Oertli S, Müller A, Steiner D et al (2005) Cross-taxon congruence of species diversity and community similarity among three insect taxa in a mosaic landscape. Biol Conserv 126:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxbrough AG, Gittings T, O’Halloran J et al (2005) Structural indicators of spider communities across the forest plantation cycle. For Ecol Manage 212:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pausas JG, Austin MP (2001) Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: an appraisal. J Vegetat Sci 12:153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharo EJ, Beattie AJ, Binns D (1999) Vascular plant diversity as a surrogate for bryophyte and lichen diversity. Conserv Biol 13:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pithon J, O’Halloran J, Moles R (2005) The influence of coniferous afforestation on lowland farmland bird communities in Ireland: different seasons and landscape contexts. Landscape Urban Plann 71:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkänen S (1997) Correlation between stand structure and ground vegetation: an analytical approach. Plant Ecol 131:109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH et al (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365:335–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sætersdal M, Gjerde I, Blom HH et al (2003) Vascular plants as a surrogate species group in complementary site selection for bryophytes, macrolichens, spiders, carabids, staphylinids, snails, and wood living polypore fungi in a northern forest. Biol Conserv 115:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Similä M, Kouki J, Mönkkönen M et al (2006) Co-variation and indicators of species diversity: can richness of forest-dwelling species be predicted in northern boreal forests? Ecol Indicators 6:686–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AJE (2004) The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith G, Gittings T, Wilson M et al (2005) Assessment of biodiversity at different stages of the forest cycle. Report for COFORD and EPA, Dublin http://www.coford.ie/iopen24/pub/pub/Project_files/312Report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommagio D (1999) Syrphidae: can they be used as environmental bioindicators? Agric Ecosys Environ 74:343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (2000) Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight MCD, Castella E (2001) An approach to interpretation of lists of insects using digitised biological information about the species. J Insect Conserv 5:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA (1998) Forest structure: a key to the ecosystem. Northwest Sci 72:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, Franklin JF, Thomas TB (1988) Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69:1689–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (2001) SPSS for Windows, version 11.0.1. SPSS, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace C (1997) New flora of the British Isles. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheyen K, Guntenspergen GR, Biesbrouck B et al (2003) An integrated analysis of the effects of past land use on forest herb colonization at the landscape scale. J Ecol 91:731–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vessby K, Söderström B, Glimskär A et al (2002) Species-richness correlations of six different taxa in Swedish seminatural grasslands. Conserv Biol 16:430–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Faith D, Manne L et al (2006) Complementarity analysis: Mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity. Biol Conserv 128:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MW, Pithon J, Gittings T et al (2006) Effects of growth stage and tree species composition on breeding bird assemblages of plantation forests. Bird Study 53:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George F. Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, G.F. et al. (2007). Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand-level management of plantation forests. In: Brockerhoff, E.G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J.A., Quine, C.P., Sayer, J., Hawksworth, D.L. (eds) Plantation Forests and Biodiversity: Oxymoron or Opportunity? . Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2807-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics