Abstract
This chapter compares six different possible approaches to the philosophy of engineering. One of these, somewhat less well developed than others, is the linguistic approach to the philosophy of engineering. The possibility of a linguistic philosophy of engineering is considered in some detail in order to advance a case for this approach. The conclusion, however, argues for a pluralistic pursuit of the philosophy of engineering, although one that includes linguistic philosophy.
What follows is philosophically incomplete. One feature of this incompleteness is that the coauthors do not fully agree about what should be included – or even what is included. This chapter is thus a provisional presentation of what has emerged from an extended discussion that often has the character of a disagreement. In addition, the chapter is methodologically naive, accepting as given certain meta-philosophical distinctions that are in fact controversial – and failing to include all that might be considered. In the current context of the relative underdevelopment of the philosophy of engineering we nevertheless hope that our effort may encourage others to consider a greater range of possibilities than might initially be imagined. To anticipate our conclusion, we want to argue for the pursuit of pluralism in the philosophy of engineering – as a way to transform engineering itself. The goal is not just to understand engineering but to change it. But in order to advance such a thesis it will be necessary to indicate more about the kind of pluralism we have in mind.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bijker, Wiebe E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelite, and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bucciarelli, Louis. 1994. Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bucciarelli, Louis. 2003. Engineering Philosophy. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University Press.
Collins, Harry, and Trevor Pinch. 2002. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know About Technology. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Durbin, Paul T. ed. 1991. Critical Perspectives on Nonacademic Science and Engineering. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.
Florman, Samuel. 1976. The Existential Pleasures of Engineering. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1975. Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Johnson, Deborah. 2001. Nature and Technology: Virtual Violations. Presidential address, 12th Biennial Conference of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, July 11.
Koen, Billy Vaughn. 2003. Discussion of the Method: Conducting the Engineer’s Approach to Problem Solving. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kroes, Peter, and Anthonie Meijers. 2000. The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol. 20. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1988. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Light, Andrew, and David Roberts. 2000. Toward New Foundations in Philosophy of Technology: Mitcham and Wittgenstein on Descriptions. Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol. 19: 125–147.
Lonergan, Bernard J.F. 1957. Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. New York: Philosophical Library.
Losonsky, Michael. 2006. Linguistic Turns in Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Goeff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Pitt, Joseph. 2000. Thinking about Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
Rorty, Richard M. ed. 1992. The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method, with Two Retrospective Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (First published, 1967.)
Russell, Bertrand. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitcham, C., Mackey, R. (2009). Comparing Approaches to the Philosophy of Engineering: Including the Linguistic Philosophical Approach. In: Poel, I., Goldberg, D. (eds) Philosophy and Engineering:. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2803-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2804-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)