Abstract
We investigated how shoot and root allocation in plants responds to increasing levels of competitive stress at different levels of soil fertility. In addition, we analyzed whether different responses were due to adaptive plasticity or should be attributed to ontogenetic drift. Plantago lanceolata plants were grown during 18 weeks at five plant densities and four nutrient supply levels in pots in the greenhouse. Thereafter root and shoot biomass was measured. There were clear negative effects of increasing plant densities on plant weights revealing strong intraspecific competition. At the lower N-treatments, the proportional allocation to root mass increased with increasing competitive stress, indicating the important role of belowground competition. At the higher N-supply rate, the relationship between competitive stress and shoot to root ratio was neutral. These responses could not be attributed to ontogenetic drift, but could only be explained by assuming adaptive plasticity. It was concluded that at lower N-supplies belowground competition dominates and leads to increased allocation to roots, while at the higher N-supply competition for soil resources and light had balanced impacts on shoot and root allocation. An alternative hypothesis explaining the observed pattern is that light competition has far less pronounced impacts on root–shoot allocation than nutrient deprival.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berendse F (1983) Interspecific competition and niche differentiation between Anthoxanthum odoratum and Plantago lanceolata in a natural hayfield. J Ecol 71:379–390. doi:10.2307/2259721
Brouwer R (1962a) Distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth J Agric Sci 10:361–376
Brouwer R (1962b) Nutritive influences on the distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth J Agric Sci 10:399–408
Cahill JF (1999) Fertilization effects on interactions between above- and belowground competition in an old field. Ecology 80:466–480
Cahill JF (2003) Lack of relationship between below-ground competition and allocation to roots in 10 grassland species. J Ecol 91:532–540. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00792.x
Casper BB, Cahill JF, Hyatt LA (1998) Above-ground competition does not alter biomass allocated to roots in Abutilon theophrasti. New Phytol 140:231–238. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00271.x
Evans GC (1972) The quantitative analysis of plant growth. University of California Press, Berkeley
Gedroc JJ, McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS (1996) Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic or both? Funct Ecol 10:44–50. doi:10.2307/2390260
GENSTAT 5 (1993) Genstat 5 (release 3) reference manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Goldberg DE, Novoplansky A (1997) On the relative importance of competition in unproductive environments. J Ecol 85:409–418. doi:10.2307/2960565
Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester
Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. Wiley, Chichester
Jasienski M, Bazzaz FA (1999) The fallacy of ratios and the testability of models in biology. Oikos 84:321–326. doi:10.2307/3546729
Keddy PA, Gaudet C, Fraser LH (2000) Effects of low and high nutrients on the competitive hierarchy of 26 shoreline plants. J Ecol 88:413–423. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00456.x
Litton CM, Ryan MG, Tinker DB, Knight DH (2003) Belowground and aboveground biomass in young postfire lodgepole pine forests of contrasting tree density. Can J For Res 33:351–363. doi:10.1139/x02-181
Müller I, Schmid B, Weiner J (2000) The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3:115–127. doi:10.1078/1433-8319-00007
Peltzer DA, Wilson SD, Gerry AK (1998) Competition intensity along a productivity gradient in a low diversity grassland. Am Nat 151:465–476. doi:10.1086/286133
Poorter H, Nagel O (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:595–607
Shipley B, Meziane D (2002) The balanced-growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Funct Ecol 16:326–331. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00626.x
Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Twolan-Strutt L, Keddy PA (1996) Above- and belowground competition intensity in two contrasting wetland communities. Ecology 77:259–270. doi:10.2307/2265675
Wardle DA (2002) Communities and ecosystems. Linking the aboveground and belowground components. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Weiner J (1990) The influence of competition on plant reproduction. In: Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (eds) Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 228–245
Whittaker RH (1975) Communities and ecosystems, 2nd edn. MacMillan, New York
Wilson SD, Tilman D (1991) Components of plant competition along an experimental gradient of nitrogen availability. Ecology 72:1050–1065. doi:10.2307/1940605
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berendse, F., Möller, F. (2008). Effects of competition on root–shoot allocation in Plantago lanceolata L.: adaptive plasticity or ontogenetic drift?. In: Van der Valk, A.G. (eds) Herbaceous Plant Ecology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2798-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2798-6_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2797-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2798-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)