Lost Sex pp 99-131

Geographical Parthenogenesis: General Purpose Genotypes and Frozen Niche Variation

Chapter

Abstract

Clonally reproducing all-female lineages of plants and animals are often more frequent at higher latitudes and altitudes, on islands, and in disturbed habitats. Attempts to explain this pattern, known as geographical parthenogenesis, generally treat the parthenogens as fugitive species that occupy marginal environments to escape competition with their sexual relatives. These ideas often fail to consider the early competitive interactions with immediate sexual ancestors, which shape alternative paths that newly formed clonal lineages might follow. Here we review the history and evidence for two hypotheses concerning the evolution of niche breadth in asexual species – the “general-purpose genotype” (GPG) and “frozen niche-variation” (FNV) models. The two models are often portrayed as mutually exclusive, respectively viewing clonal lineages as generalists versus specialists. Nonetheless, they are complex syllogisms that share common assumptions regarding the likely origins of clonal diversity and the strength of interclonal selection in shaping the ecological breadth of asexual populations. Both models find support in ecological and phylogeographic studies of a wide range of organisms, and sometimes generalist and specialist traits (e.g., physiological tolerance, microspatial preference, seasonal abundance, food habits, etc.) are found together in an asexual organism. Ultimately, persistent natural clones should be viewed as microspecies in ecological models that consider spatial and temporal heterogeneity rather than multi-locus genotypes in simplistic population models.

References

  1. Annest JL, Templeton AR (1978) Genetic recombination and clonal selection in Drosophila mercatorum. Genetics 89: 193–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonovics J (1968) Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations, V. Evolution of self-fertility. Heredity 23: 219–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) Genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, pp. 147–172Google Scholar
  4. Barata C, Hontoria F, Amat F, Browne R (1996) Competition between sexual and parthenogenetic Artemia: temperature and strain effects. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 196: 313–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell G (1982) The Masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  6. Beukeboom L, Vrijenhoek RC (1998) Evolutionary genetics and ecology of sperm-dependent parthenogenesis. J Evol Biol 11: 755–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bierzychudek P (1989) Environmental sensitivity of sexual and apomictic Antennaria: do apomicts have general-purpose genotypes? Evolution 43: 1456–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolger DT, Case TJ (1994) Divergent ecology of sympatric clones of the asexual gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris. Oecologia 100: 397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne RA, Hoopes CW (1990) Genotypic diversity and selection in asexual brine shrimp (Artemia). Evolution 44: 1035–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Browne RA, Wanigasekera G (2000) Combined effects of salinity and temperature on survival and reproduction of five species of Artemia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 244: 29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bulger AJ, Schultz RJ (1979) Heterosis and interclonal variation in thermal tolerance in unisexual fish. Evolution 33: 848–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bulger AJ, Schultz RJ (1982) Origins of thermal adaptation in northern vs southern populations of a unisexual hybrid fish. Evolution 36: 1041–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carson H (1968) The population flush and its genetic consequences. In: Lewontin R (ed) Population biology and evolution. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York, pp. 123–137Google Scholar
  14. Carvalho G (1987) The clonal ecology of Daphnia magna (Crustacea: Cladocera): II. Thermal differentiation among seasonal clones. J Anim Ecol 56: 469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Case T (1990) Patterns of coexistence in sexual and asexual species of Cnemidophorus lizards. Oecologia 83: 220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Case TJ, Taper ML (1986) On the coexistence and coevolution of asexual and sexual competitors. Evolution 40: 366–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chesson PL (1985) Coexistence of competitors in spatially and temporally varying environments: a look at the combined effects of different sorts of variability. Theor Popul Biol 28: 263–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christensen B (1979) Differential distribution of genetic variants in triploid parthenogenetic Trichoniscus pusillus (Isopoda: Crustacea) in a heterogeneous environment. Hereditas 91: 179–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Christensen B (1980) Constant differential distribution of genetic variants in parthenogenetic forms of Lumbricillus lineatus (Enchytraeidae, Oligochaeta) in a heterogeneous environment. Hereditas 92: 193–198Google Scholar
  20. Christensen B, Noer H (1986) Spatial and temporal components of genetic variation in triploid parthenogenetic Trichoniscus pusillus (Isopoda, Crustacea). Hereditas 105: 277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christensen B, Noer H, Theisen BF (1988) Differential response to humidity and soil type among clones of triploid parthenogenetic Trichoniscus pusillus (Isopoda, Crustacea). Hereditas 108: 213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clanton W (1934) An unusual situation in the salamander Ambystoma jeffersonianum (Green). Occ Pap Mus Zool Univ Michigan 290: 1–15Google Scholar
  23. Cuellar O (1977) Animal parthenogenesis. Science 197: 837–843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cullum A (1997) Comparisons of physiological performance in sexual and asexual whiptail lizards (genus Cnemidophorus): implications for the role of heterozygosity. Am Natur 150: 24–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. da Cuhna A, Burla H, Dobzhansky T (1950) Adaptive chromosome polymorphism in Drosophila willistoni. Evolution 4: 212–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Darling JA, Reitzel AM, Finnerty JR (2004) Regional population structure of a widely introduced estuarine invertebrate: Nematostella vectensis Stephenson in New England. Mol Ecol 13: 2969–2981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de Kovel CGF, de Jong G (2000) Selection on apomictic lineages of Taraxacum at establishment in a mixed sexual apomictic population. J Evol Biol 13: 561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Delmotte F, Leterme N, Gauthier J-P, Rispe C, Simon. J-C (2002) Genetic architecture of sexual and asexual populations of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi based on allozyme and microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 11: 711–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doeringsfeld MR, Schlosser IJ, Elder JF, Evenson DP (2004) Phenotypic consequences of genetic variation in a gynogenetic complex of Phoxinus eos-neogaeus clonal fish (Pisces: Cyprinidae) inhabiting a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 58: 1261–1273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dolatti L, Ghareyazie B, Moharramipour S, Noori-Daloii MR (2005) Evidence for regional diversity and host adaptation in Iranian populations of the Russian wheat aphid. Entomol Exp Appl 114: 171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Doncaster CP, Pound GE, Cox SJ (2000) The ecological cost of sex. Nature 404: 281–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Drosopoulis S (1978) Laboratory synthesis of a pseudogamous triploid “species” of the genus Mullerianella (Homoptera, Delphacidae). Evolution 32: 916–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dybdahl MF, Kane SL (2005) Adaptation vs. phenotypic plasticity in the success of a clonal invader. Ecology 86: 1592–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Echelle AA, Echelle AF (1997) Patterns of abundance and distribution among members of a unisexual-bisexual complex of fishes (Atherinidae: Menidia). Copeia 1997: 249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Elder JF, Jr, Schlosser IJ (1995) Extreme clonal uniformity of Phoxinus eos/neogaeus gynogens (Pisces: Cyprinidae) among variable habitats in northern Minnesota beaver ponds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 5001–5005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ellstrand NC, Roose ML (1987) Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am J Bot 74: 123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Enghoff H (1976) Parthenogenesis and bisexuality in the millipede, Nemasoma varicorne C. L. Koch, 1847 (Diplopoda: Blaniulidae). Morphological, ecological and biogeographical aspects. Vidensk Meddr Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 139: 21–59Google Scholar
  38. Fenton B, Woodford JAT, Malloch G (1998) Analysis of clonal diversity of the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer), in Scotland, UK and evidence for the existence of a predominant clone. Mol Ecol 7: 1475–1487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fox JA, Dybdahl MF, Jokela J, Lively CM (1995) Genetic structure of coexisting sexual and clonal subpopulations in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Evolution 50: 1541–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Futuyma DJ, Cort RP, van Noordwijk I (1984) Adaptation to host plants in the fall cankerworm (Alsophila pometaria) and its bearing on the evolution of host affiliation in phytophagous insects. Am Natur 123: 287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Futuyma DJ, Leipertz SL, Mitter C (1981) Selective factors affecting clonal variation in the fall cankerworm Alsophila pometaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Heredity 47: 151–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gade B, Parker ED Jr (1997) The effect of life cycle stage and genotype on desiccation tolerance in the colonizing parthenogenetic cockroach Pycnoscelus surinamensis and its sexual ancestor P. indicus. J Evol Biol 10: 479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gaggiotti OE (1994) An ecological model for the maintenance of sex and geographic parthenogenesis. J Theor Biol 167: 201–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. García-Ramos G, Kirkpatrick M (1997) Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51: 21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ghiselin MT (1974) The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  46. Glesener RR, Tilman D (1978) Sexuality and the components of environmental uncertainty: clues from geographic parthenogenesis in terrestrial animals. Am Nat 112: 659–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Goldschmidt RB (1940) The material basis of evolution. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  48. Gomes-Ferreira A, Ribeiro F, Moreira da Costa L, Cowx IG, Collares-Pereira MJ (2005) Variability in diet and foraging behaviour between sexes and ploidy forms of the hybridogenetic Squalius alburnoides complex (Cyprinidae) in the Guadiana River basin, Portugal. J Fish Biol 66: 454–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gray MM, Weeks SC (2001) A comparison of dietary use patterns of clonal and sexual fish (Poeciliidae: Poeciliopsis). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58: 1313–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Groot TVM, Janssen A, Pallini A, Breeuwer JAJ (2005) Adaptation in the asexual false spider mite Brevipalpus phoenicis: Evidence for frozen niche variation. Exp Appl Acarol 36: 165–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Haack L, Simon J-C, Gauthier J-P, Plantegenest M, Dedryver C-A (2000) Evidence for predominant clones in a cyclically parthenogenetic organism provided by combined demographic and genetic analyses. Mol Ecol 9: 2055–2066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Haag C, Ebert D (2004) A new hypothesis to explain geographic parthenogenesis. Ann Zool Fennici 41: 539–544Google Scholar
  53. Haldane JBS, Jayakar SD (1963) Polymorphism due to selection of varying direction. J Genet 58: 237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hamilton WD, Henderson P, Moran N (1981) Fluctuation of environmental and coevolved antagonist polymorphism as factors in the maintenance of sex. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle D (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron Press, New York, pp. 363–381Google Scholar
  55. Harshman LG, Futuyma DJ (1985) The origin and distribution of clonal diversity in Alsophila pometaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Evolution 39: 315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hebert PDN (1974) Ecological differences among genotypes in a natural population of Daphnia magna. Heredity 33: 327–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hebert PDN, Beaton MJ, Schwartz SS, Stanton DJ (1989) Polyphyletic origins of asexuality in Daphnia pulex. I. Breeding-system variation and levels of clonal diversity. Evolution 43: 1004–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hebert PDN, Crease TJ (1980) Clonal coexistence in Daphnia pulex (Leydig): another planktonic paradox. Science 207: 1363–1365Google Scholar
  59. Hebert PDN, Ward RD, Weider LJ (1988) Clonal diversity patterns and breeding-system variation in Daphnia pulex, an asexual-sexual complex. Evolution 42: 147–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hedrick P (1995) Genetic polymorphism in a temporally varying environment: effects of delayed germination or diapause. Heredity 75: 164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hedrick PW, Ginevan ME, Ewing EP (1976) Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7: 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hembre LK, Megard RO (2006) Direct and indirect effects of predation on the genetic structure of a Daphnia population. J Plankton Res 28: 1129–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Horne DJ, Martens K (1999) Geographical parthenogenesis in European non-marine ostracods: post-glacial invasion or Holocene stability? Hydrobiologia 391: 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hotz H, Beerli P, Guex G-D, Semlitsch RD, Uzzell T (1994) Clonal diversity and hybrid frequency are not correlated in water frogs: is the Frozen Niche Variation model wrong? II International Symposium on Ecology and Genetics of European Water Frogs 39: 513–514Google Scholar
  65. Hotz H, Semlitsch RD, Gutmann E, Guex G-D, Beerli P (1999) Spontaneous heterosis in larval life-history traits of hemiclonal frog hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 2171–2176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hoy Jensen L, Enghoff H, Frydenberg J, Parker ED Jr (2002) Genetic diversity and the phylogeography of parthenogenesis: comparing bisexual and thelytokous populations of Nemasoma varicorne (Diplopoda: Nemasomatidae) in Denmark. Hereditas 136: 184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jacobsen R, Forbes V (1997) Clonal variation in life history traits and feeding rates in the gastropod, Potamopyrgus antipodarum: performance across a salinity gradient. Funct Ecol 11: 260–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jaenike J, Parker ED Jr, Selander RK (1980) Clonal niche structure in the parthenogenetic earthworm Octolasion tyrtaeum. Am Natur 116: 196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jokela J, Lively CM, Dybdahl MF, Fox JA (2003) Genetic variation and maintenance of sex. Biol J Linn Soc 79: 165–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Jokela J, Lively CM, Fox JA, Dybdahl MF (1997) Flat reaction norms and ‘frozen’ phenotypic variation in clonal snails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Evolution 51: 1120–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kawecki TJ (1988) Unisexual/bisexual breeding complexes in Poeciliidae: why do males copulate with unisexual females? Evolution 42: 1018–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kearney M (2005) Hybridization, glaciation and geographical parthenogenesis. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kearney M (2006) Response to Lundmark: Polyploidization, hybridization and geographical parthenogenesis. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kearney M, Porter WP (2004) Mapping the fundamental niche: physiology, climate, and the distribution of a nocturnal lizard. Ecology 85: 3119–3131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kearney M, Shine R (2004) Developmental success, stability, and plasticity in closely related parthenogenetic and sexual lizards (Heteronotia, Gekkonidae). Evolution 58: 1560–1572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Kearney M, Shine R (2005) Lower fecundity in parthenogenetic geckos than sexual relatives in the Australian arid zone. J Evol Biol 18: 609–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kearney M, Wahl R, Autumn K (2005) Increased capacity for sustained locomotion at low temperature in parthenogenetic geckos of hybrid origin. Physiol Biochem Zool 78: 316–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kenny N (1996) A test of the general purpose genotype hypothesis in sexual and asexual Erigeron species. Am Midl Nat 136: 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kirkendall LR, Stenseth NC (1990) Ecological and evolutionary stability of sperm-dependent parthenogenesis: effects of partial niche overlap between sexual and asexual females. Evolution 44: 698–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Koella JC (1988) The tangled bank: the maintenance of sexual reproduction through competitive interactions. J Evol Biol 2: 95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ladle R, Johnstone R, Judson O (1993) Coevolutionary dynamics of sex in a metapopulation: escaping the Red Queen. Proc R Soc Lond B 253: 155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Leberg P, Vrijenhoek RC (1994) Variation among desert topminnows in their susceptibility to attack by exotic parasites. Cons Biol 8: 419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Levene H (1953) Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am Nat 87: 331–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lima NRW (2005) Variations on maternal-embryonic relationship in two natural and six laboratory made hybrids of Poeciliopsis monacha-lucida (Pisces, Cyprinodontiformes). Braz Arch Biol Technol 48: 73–79Google Scholar
  85. Lima NRW, Koback CJ, Vrijenhoek RC (1996) Evolution of sexual mimicry in sperm-dependent clonal forms of Poeciliopsis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). J Evol Biol 9: 185–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lima NRW, Vrijenhoek RC (1996) Avoidance of filial cannibalism by sexual and clonal forms of Poeciliopsis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim Behav 51: 293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lindroth CH (1954) Experimentelle Beobachtungen an parthenogenetischem und bisexuellem Otiorrhynchus dubius Stroem (Col., Curculionidae). Entomol Tidskr 75: 111–116Google Scholar
  88. Lively CM, Craddock C, Vrijenhoek RC (1990) The Red Queen hypothesis supported by parasitism in sexual and clonal fish. Nature 344: 864–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Llewellyn K, Loxdale H, Harrington R, Brookes C, Clark S, P S (2003) Migration and genetic structure of the grain aphid (Sitobion avenae) in Britain related to climate and clonal fluctuation as revealed using microsatellites. Mol Ecol 12: 21–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Lokki J, Saura A, Lankinen P, Suomalainen E (1976) Genetic polymorphism and evolution in parthenogenetic animals. VI. Diploid and triploid Polydrosus mollis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Hereditas 82: 209–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Lokki J, Suomalainen E, Saura A, Lankinen P (1975) Genetic polymorphism and evolution in parthenogenetic animals. II. Diploid and polyploid Solenobia triquetrella(Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Genetics 79: 513–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Lomnicki A (2001) Carrying capacity, competition and maintenance of sexuality. Evol Ecol Res 3: 603–610Google Scholar
  93. Lowe CH, Wright JW (1966) Evolution of parthenogenetic species of Cnemidophorus (whiptail lizards) in western North America. J Arizona Acad Sci 4: 81–87Google Scholar
  94. Løyning MK (2000) Reproductive performance of clonal and sexual bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the field. J Evol Biol 13: 743–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Lundmark M (2006) Polyploidization, hybridization and geographical parthenogenesis. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Lundmark M, Saura A (2006) Asexuality alone does not explain the success of clonal forms in insects with geographical parthenogenesis. Hereditas 143: 23–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Lynch M (1983) Ecological genetics of Daphnia pulex. Evolution 37: 358–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Lynch M (1984) Destabilizing hybridization, general-purpose genotypes and geographical parthenogenesis. Quart Rev Biol 59: 257–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Lynch M (1985) Spontaneous mutations for life history characters in an obligate parthenogen. Evolution 39: 804–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Lynch M, Bürger R, Butcher D, Gabriel W (1993) The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. J Hered 84: 339–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Lynch M, Gabriel W (1987) Environmental tolerance. Am Nat 129: 283–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  103. Mark Welch D, Meselson M (2000) Evidence for the evolution of bdelloid rotifers without sexual recombination or genetic exchange. Science 288: 1211–1215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Martins MJ, Colares-Pereira MJ, Cowz IG, Coelho MM (1998) Diploidsv.triploids of Rutilus alburnoides: spatial segregation and morphological differences. J Fish Biol 52: 817–828Google Scholar
  105. Maslin TP (1967) Skin grafting in the bisexual teiid lizard Cnemidophorus sexlineatus and in the unisexual C. tesselatus. J Expt Zool 166: 137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Maynard Smith J (1962) Disruptive selection, polymorphism and sympatric speciation. Nature 195: 60–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Mayr E (1954) Change of genetic environment and evolution. In: Huxley J (ed) Evolution as a process. Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 157–180Google Scholar
  108. Menken SBJ, Smit E, Nijs HCMD (1995) Genetical population structure in plants: gene flow between diploid sexual and triploid Asexual Dandelions (Taraxacum Section Ruderalia). Evolution 49: 1108–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Michaels HJ, Bazzaz FA (1989) Individual and population responses of sexual and apomictic plants to environmental gradients. Am Nat 134: 190–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Mitter C, Futuyma DJ, Schneider JC, Hare JD (1979) Genetic variation and host plant relations in a parthenogenetic moth. Evolution 33: 777–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Moore WS (1975) Stability of unisexual-bisexual populations of Poeciliopsis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Ecology 56: 791–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Moore WS (1977) An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Q Rev Biol 52: 263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Moore WS (1984) Evolutionary ecology of unisexual fishes. In: Turner BJ (ed) Evolutionary genetics of fishes. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 329–398Google Scholar
  114. Moore WS, McKay FE (1971) Coexistence in unisexual-bisexual species complexes of Poeciliopsis (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Ecology 52: 791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Moore WS, Miller RR, Schultz RJ (1970) Distribution, adaptation and probable origin of an all-female form of Poeciliopsis (Pisces: Poeciliidae) in northwestern Mexico. Evolution 24: 789–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Moritz C, Brown WM, Densmore LD, Wright JW, Vyas D, Donnellan S, Adams M, Baverstock P (1989) Genetic diversity and the dynamics of hybrid parthenogenesis in Cnemidophorus (Teiidae) and Heteronotia (Gekonidae). In: Dawley R, Bogart J (eds) Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. Bulletin 466, New York State Museum, Albany, New York, pp. 87–112Google Scholar
  117. Myers MJ, Meyer CP, Resh VH (2000) Neritid and thiarid gastropods from French Polynesian streams: how reproduction (sexual, parthenogenetic) and dispersal (active, passive) affect population structure. Freshw Biol 44: 535–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Negovetic S, Anholt BR, Semlitsch RD, Reyer H-U (2001) Specific responses of sexual and hybridogenetic European waterfrog tadpoles to temperature. Ecology 82: 766–774Google Scholar
  119. Niklasson M (1995) Clonal diversity and individual adaptability in two colonizing parthenogenetic insects. PhD dissertation, Lund University, Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  120. Niklasson M, Parker ED Jr (1994) Fitness variation in an invading parthenogenetic cockroach. Oikos 71: 47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Niklasson M, Tomiuk J, Parker ED Jr (2004) Maintenance of clonal diversity in Dipsa bifurcata (Fallén, 1810) (Diptera: Lonchopteridae). I. Fluctuating seasonal selection moulds long-term coexistence. Heredity 93: 62–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Ochman HB, Stille B, Niklasson M, Selander RK (1980) Evolution of clonal diversity in the parthenogenetic fly Lonchoptera dubia. Evolution 34: 539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Parker ED Jr (1979) Ecological implications of clonal diversity in parthenogenetic morphospecies. Am Zool 19: 753–762Google Scholar
  124. Parker ED Jr (2002) Geographic parthenogenesis in terrestrial invertebrates: generalist or specialist clones? In: Hughes RN (ed) Progress in asexual propagation and reproductive strategies. Oxford-IBH, Oxford, pp. 93–114Google Scholar
  125. Parker ED Jr, Niklasson M (1995) Desiccation resistance in invading parthenogenetic cockroaches: a search for the general purpose genotype. J Evol Biol 8: 331337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Parker ED Jr, Niklasson M (2000) Genetic structure and evolution in parthenogenetic animals. In: Singh R, Krimbas C (eds) Evolutionary genetics from molecules to morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 456–474Google Scholar
  127. Parker ED Jr, Selander RK (1976) The organization of genetic diversity in the parthenogenetic lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus. Genetics 84: 791–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Parker ED Jr, Selander RK, Hudson RO, Lester LJ (1977) Genetic diversity in colonizing parthenogenetic cockroaches. Evolution 31: 836–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Paulissen MA, Walker JM, Cordes JE (1988) Ecology of syntopic clones of the parthenogenetic whiptail lizard, Cnemidophorus ‘laredoensis’. J Herpetol 22: 331–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Pearson CVM, Rogers AD, Sheader M (2002) The genetic structure of the rare lagoonal sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis Stephenson (Cnidaria; Anthozoa) in the United Kingdom based on RAPD analysis. Mol Ecol 11: 2285–2293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Peck JR, Yearsley JM, Waxman D (1998) Explaining the geographic distributions of sexual and asexual populations. Nature 391: 889–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Pound GE, Cox SJ, Doncaster CP (2004) The accumulation of deleterious mutations within the frozen niche variation hypothesis. J Evol Biol 17: 651–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Pound GE, Doncaster CP, Cox SJ (2002) A Lotka-Volterra model of coexistence between a sexual population and multiple asexual clones. J Theor Biol 217: 535–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Price AH (1986) The ecology and evolutionary implications of competition and parthenogenesis in Cnemidophorus. PhD dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NMGoogle Scholar
  135. Radtkey RR, Donnellan SC, Fisher RN, Moritz C, Hanley KA, Case TJ (1995) When species collide: the origin and spread of an asexual species of gecko. Proc R Soc Lond B 259: 145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Rist L, Semlitsch RD, Hotz H, Reyer H-U (1996) Feeding behaviour, food consumption and growth efficiency of hemiclonal and parental tadpoles of the Rana esculenta complex Funct Ecol 11: 735–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Robinson MT, Weeks AR, Hoffmann AA (2002) Geographic patterns of clonal diversity in the earth mite species Penthaleus major with particular emphasis on species margins. Evolution 56: 1160–1167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Rossi V, Benassi G, Leonardi S, Piotti A, Menozzi P (2006) Clonal diversity of Heterocypris incongruens (Crustacea: Ostracoda) in Northern Italian ricefields. Arch Hydrobiol 166: 225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Rossi V, Menozzi P (1993) The clonal ecology of Heterocypris incongruens (Ostracoda): life-history traits and photoperiod. Funct Ecol 7: 177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Roughgarden J (1972) Evolution of niche width. Am Nat 106: 683–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Saura A, Lokki J, Lankinen P, Suomalainen E (1976a) Genetic polymorphism and evolution in parthenogenetic animals. III. Tetraploid Otiorrhynchus scaber (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Hereditas 82: 79–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Saura A, Lokki J, Lankinen P, Suomalainen E (1976b) Genetic polymorphism and evolution in parthenogenetic animals. IV. Triploid Otiorrhynchus salicis Strom (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Entomol Scand 7: 1–6Google Scholar
  143. Schenck RA, Vrijenhoek RC (1986) Spatial and temporal factors affecting coexistence among sexual and clonal forms of Poeciliopsis. Evolution 40: 1060–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Schley D, Doncaster CP, Sluckin T (2004) Population models of sperm-dependent parthenogenesis. J Theor Biol 229: 559–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Schön I, Butlin RK, Griffiths HI, Martens K (1998) Slow molecular evolution in an ancient asexual ostracod. Proc R Soc Lond B 265: 235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Schlosser IJ, Doeringsfeld MR, Elder J, F. AL (1998) Niche relationships of clonal and sexual fish in a heterogeneous landscape. Ecology 79: 953–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Schultz RJ (1971) Special adaptive problems associated with unisexual fishes. Am Zool 11: 351–360Google Scholar
  148. Schultz RJ (1973) Unisexual fish: laboratory synthesis of a “species”. Science 179: 180–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Schultz RJ, Fielding E (1989) Fixed genotypes in variable environments. In: Dawley R, Bogart J (eds) Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Museum, Albany, New York, pp. 32–38Google Scholar
  150. Scudday JR (1973) A new species of lizard of the Cnemidophorus tesselatus group from Texas. J Herpetol 7: 363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Semlitsch RD (1993) Asymmetric competition in mixed populations of tadpoles of the hybridogenetic Rana esculenta complex. Evolution 47: 510–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Semlitsch RD, Hotz H, Guex G-D (1997) Competition among tadpoles of coexisting hemiclones of hybridogenetic Rana esculenta: support for the frozen niche variation model. Evolution 51: 1249–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Service P (1984) Genotypic interactions in an aphid-host plant relationship: Uroleucon rudbeckiae and Rudbeckia laciniata. Oecologia V61: 271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Service PM, Lenski RE (1982) Aphid genotypes, plant genotypes and genetic diversity: a demographic analysis of experimental data. Evolution 36: 1276–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Snell TW (1979) Intraspecific competition and population structure in rotifers. Ecology 60: 494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Solbrig O (1971) The population biology of dandelions. Am Sci 59: 686–694Google Scholar
  157. Solbrig OT, Simpson BB (1974) Components of regulation of a population of dandelions in Michigan. J Ecol 62: 473–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Solbrig OT, Simpson BB (1977) A garden experiment on competition between biotypes of the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). J Ecol 65: 427–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Stalker HD (1954) Parthenogenesis in Drosophila. Genetics 39: 4–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Stenseth NC, Kirkendall LR, Moran N (1985) On the evolution of pseudogamy. Evolution 39: 294–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Stratton DA (1994) Genotype-by-environment interactions for fitness of Erigeron annuus show fine-scale selective heterogeneity. Evolution 48: 1607–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Strobeck C (1970) Haploid selection with n alleles in m niches. Am Nat 113: 439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Strobeck C (1974) Sufficient conditions for polymorphism with N niches and M mating groups. Am Nat 108: 152–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Sunnucks P, England PR, Taylor AC, Hales DF (1996) Microsatellite and chromosome evolution of parthenogenetic Sitobion aphids in Australia. Genetics 144: 747–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Suomalainen E, Saura A, Lokki J (1987) Cytology and evolution in parthenogenesis. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  166. Tagg N, Doncaster CP, Innes DJ (2005b) Resource competition between genetically varied and genetically uniform populations of Daphnia pulex (Leydig): does asexual reproduction confer a short-term ecological advantage? Biol J Linn Soc 85: 11–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Tagg N, Innes DJ, Doncaster CP (2005a) Outcomes of reciprocal invasions between genetically diverse and genetically uniform populations of Daphnia obtusa (Kurz). Oecologia 143: 527–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Templeton AR (1982) The prophecies of parthenogenesis. In: Dingle H, Hegmann JP (eds) Evolution and genetics of life histories. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 75–102Google Scholar
  169. Thibault RE (1978) Ecological and evolutionary relationships among diploid and triploid unisexual fishes associated with the bisexual species, Poeciliopsis lucida (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae). Evolution 32: 613–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Tomiuk J, Niklasson M, Parker ED Jr (2004) Maintenance of clonal diversity in Dipsa bifurcata (Fallén, 1810) (Diptera: Lonchopteridae). II. Diapause stabilizes clonal coexistence. Heredity 93: 72–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Tomiuk J, Wöhrman K (1981) Changes in genotype frequencies at the MDH-locus in populations of Macrosiphum rosae (L.) (Hem., Aphididae). Biol Zentralbl 100: 631–640Google Scholar
  172. Tomlinson J (1966) The advantage of hermaphroditism and parthenogenesis. J Theor Biol 11: 54–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Tunner HG, Nopp H (1979) Heterosis in the common European water frog. Naturwissenschaften 66: 268–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Van Doninck K, Schön I, De Bruyn L, Martens K (2002) A general purpose genotype in an ancient asexual. Oecologia 132: 205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Van Doninck K, Schön I, Maes F, De Bruyn L, Martens K (2003) Ecological strategies in the ancient asexual animal group Darwinulidae (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Freshwater Biol 48: 1285–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Vandel A (1928) La parthénogénèse géographique contribution a l`étude biologique et cytologique de la parthénogénèse naturelle. Bull Biol France Belg 62: 164–281Google Scholar
  177. Vandel A (1940) La parthénogénèse géographique. IV. Polyploidie et distribution géographique. Bull Biol France Belg 74: 94–100Google Scholar
  178. Vavrek MC, McGraw JB, Yang HS (1996) Within-population variation in demography of Taraxacum officinale: Maintenance of genetic diversity. Ecology 77: 2098–2107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Vorburger C, Lancaster M, Sunnucks P (2003b) Environmentally related patterns of reproductive modes in Myzus persicae and the predominance of two ‘superclones’ in Victoria, Australia. Mol Ecol 12: 3493–3503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Vorburger C, Sunnucks P, Ward SA (2003a) Explaining the coexistence of asexuals with their sexual progenitors: no evidence for general-purpose genotypes in obligate parthenogens of the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae. Ecol Lett 6: 1091–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Vrijenhoek RC (1978) Coexistence of clones in a heterogeneous environment. Science 199: 549–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Vrijenhoek RC (1979) Factors affecting clonal diversity and coexistence. Am Zool 19: 787–797Google Scholar
  183. Vrijenhoek RC (1984) Ecological differentiation among clones: the frozen niche variation model. In: Wöhrmann K, Loeschcke V (eds) Population biology and evolution. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 217–231Google Scholar
  184. Vrijenhoek RC (1985) Animal population genetics and disturbance: the effects of local extinctions and recolonizations on heterozygosity and fitness. In: Pickett STA, White P (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, New York, pp. 265–285Google Scholar
  185. Vrijenhoek RC (1989a) Genetic and ecological constraints on the origins and establishment of unisexual vertebrates. In: Dawley R, Bogart J (eds) Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Museum, Albany, New York, pp. 24–31Google Scholar
  186. Vrijenhoek RC (1989b) Genotypic diversity and coexistence among sexual and clonal forms of Poeciliopsis. In: Otte D, Endler J (eds) Speciation and Its Consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp. 386–400Google Scholar
  187. Vrijenhoek RC (1990) Genetic diversity and the ecology of asexual populations. In: Wöhrmann K, Jain S (eds) Population biology and evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 175–197Google Scholar
  188. Vrijenhoek RC (1998a) Animal clones and diversity. Bioscience 48: 617–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Vrijenhoek RC (1998b) Clonal organisms and the benefits of sex. In: Carvalho G (ed) Advances in molecular ecology. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 151–172Google Scholar
  190. Vrijenhoek RC, Angus RA, Schultz RJ (1977) Variation and heterozygosity in sexually vs. clonally reproducing populations of Poeciliopsis. Evolution 31: 767–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Vrijenhoek RC, Angus RA, Schultz RJ (1978) Variation and clonal structure in a unisexual fish. Am Nat 112: 41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Vrijenhoek RC, Lerman S (1982) Heterozygosity and developmental stability under sexual and asexual breeding systems. Evolution 36: 768–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Vrijenhoek RC, Pfeiler E (1997) Differential survival of sexual and asexual Poeciliopsis during environmental stress. Evolution 51: 1593–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Wallace B (1959) The influence of genetic systems on geographic distribution. Cold Spr Harb Symp Quant Biol 24: 193–205Google Scholar
  195. Weeks A, Hoffmann A (1998) Intense selection of mite clones in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 52: 1325–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Weeks SC (1993) The effects of recurrent clonal formation on clonal invasion patterns and sexual persistence: a Monte Carlo simulation of the frozen niche variation model. Am Nat 141: 409–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Weeks SC (1995) Comparisons of life-history traits between clonal and sexual fish (Poeciliopsis: Poeciliidae) raised in monoculture and mixed treatments. Evol Ecol 9: 258–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Weeks SC, Gaggiotti OE, Spindler KP, Schenck RE, Vrijenhoek RC (1992) Feeding behavior in sexual and clonal strains of Poeciliopsis. Behav Biol Sociobiol 30: 1–6Google Scholar
  199. Weider LJ (1989) Spatial heterogeneity and clonal structure in arctic populations of apomictic Daphnia. Ecology 70: 1405–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Weider LJ (1993) A test of the “general-purpose” genotype hypothesis: differential tolerance to thermal and salinity stress among Daphnia clones. Evolution 47: 965–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Weider LJ, Hebert PDN (1987) Ecological and physiological differentiation among low-Arctic clones of Daphnia pulex. Ecology 68: 188–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Weinzierl RP, Beukeboom LW, Gerace L, Michiels NK (1999) Spatial and ecological overlap between coexisting sexual and parthenogenetic Schmidtea polychroa (Tricladida; Platyhelminthes) Hydrobiologia 39: 170–185Google Scholar
  203. Weisman A (1889) The significance of sexual reproduction in the theory of natural selection. In: Poulton EB, Schonland S, Shipley AE (eds) Essays upon heredity and kindred biological problems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 254–338Google Scholar
  204. West SA, Lively CM, Read AF (1999) A pluralistic approach to sex and recombination. J Evol Biol 12: 1003–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. West SA, Peters AD (2000) Evolution: paying for sex is not easy. Nature 407: 962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Wetherington JD, Kotora KE, Vrijenhoek RC (1987) A test of the spontaneous heterosis hypothesis for unisexual vertebrates. Evolution 41: 721–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Wetherington JD, Schenck RA, Vrijenhoek RC (1989a) Origins and ecological success of unisexual Poeciliopsis: the Frozen Niche Variation model. In: Meffe GA, Snelson FF, Jr (eds) The ecology and evolution of poeciliid fishes. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp. 259–276Google Scholar
  208. Wetherington JD, Weeks SC, Kotora KE, Vrijenhoek RC (1989b) Genotypic and environmental components of variation in growth and reproduction of fish hemiclones (Poeciliopsis: Poeciliidae). Evolution 43: 635–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. White MJD (1970) Heterozygosity and genetic polymorphism in parthenogenetic animals. In: Hecht MK, Steere WC (eds) Essays in evolution and genetics in honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  210. White MJD (1973) Animal cytology and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  211. White MJD (1978) Modes of speciation. WH Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  212. Wilbur HM (1971) The ecological relationship of the salamander Ambystoma laterale to its all-female, gynogenetic associate. Evolution 25: 168–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  214. Williams GC, Mitton JB (1973) Why reproduce sexually? J Theor Biol 39: 545–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Wilson AC, Sunnucks, CP, Hales DF (1999) Microevolution, low clonal diversity and genetic affinities of parthenogenetic Sitobion aphids in New Zealand. Mol Ecol 8: 1655–1666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Wright JW, Lowe CH (1968) Weeds, polyploids, parthenogenesis and the geographical and ecological distribution of all-female species of Cnemidophorus. Copeia 1968: 128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monterey Bay Aquarium Research InstituteMontereyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and GeneticsAarhus University, Ny MunkegardeAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations