Paleolithic Stone Tool Assemblages from Sharjah and Ras al Khaimah in the United Arab Emirates

  • Julie Scott-Jackson
  • William Scott-Jackson
  • Jeffrey I. Rose
Chapter

Abstract

Over the past 20 years a virtual moribundity has descended on Paleolithic research in the region of the Persian Gulf. This predicament arose as a direct consequence of the reassessment of Holger Kapel’s lithic ‘Group’ classifications in his ‘Atlas of the Stone Age Cultures of Qatar’ (Kapel, 1967) by the French team working in Qatar during 1976–1978 (see Inizan, 1980). Group A, which Kapel had tentatively assigned to the Paleolithic, was categorized by the French as Neolithic effectively curtailing Paleolithic research in the Persian Gulf region as the re-evaluation of Group A was seen by many to demonstrate a general absence of the Paleolithic in the entire region and furthermore, suggesting that any lithics found in the Gulf area would almost certainly not be Paleolithic. A view which was strengthened, certainly in the United Arab Emirates, following field surveys in Sharjah Emirate by various French Archaeological Missions between 1984 and 1988 (see Boucharlat et al., 1984; Cauvin and Calley, 1984; Calley and Santoni, 1986; Millet, 1997) and further investigations between 1990 and 1992 (Briand et al., 1992). The result of these investigations was the discovery of numerous prehistoric lithic assemblages. Briand and colleagues state in their 1992 report, “We have already carried out a certain number of studies which show that the lithic industry in the area of Mleiha, as in all the Emirate of Sharjah, dates back to the sixth and fourth millennia, though in most cases it does not present a well-defined typology… Without going into detail, we may say that all the petrographic examples found among the tools whether from the interior or the from the coast of Sharjah, may be found near the sites…but, the fabrication of the tools which we know at Sharjah could have been carried out using raw materials from local outcrops”. They also add: “The fact that we find in the Emirate of Sharjah all the petrographic components encountered in the stone tools does not mean that all the lithic industry recorded locally comes automatically from this emirate. It only means that men of the fifth and fourth millennia could find nearby all the materials necessary to [for] the debitage and to [for] their knapping. Inversely, even if imports from afar took place, they could not explain all the local lithic industry”.

So often, thorough investigations generated problematic data, and for the French researchers these were no exception as they concluded that the Sharjah Emirate lithic assemblages dated back to the fourth, fifth and sixth millennia (thereby making them post-Paleolithic) although generally, in their words, the lithics “did not present a well defined typology”. Furthermore, (as noted above) “they could not explain all the local lithic industry”.

Keywords

Levallois Ras al Khaimah Sharjah Survey Technology UAE 

References

  1. Alsharekh A. The archaeology of Central Saudi Arabia: lithic artefacts and stone structures in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia: Deputy Ministry of Antiquities and Museums; 2006.Google Scholar
  2. Amirkhanov H. Research on the Paleolithic and Neolithic of Hadhramaut and Mahra. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy. 1994;5:217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boucharlat R, Dalongeville A, Hesse A, Sanlaville P. A survey in Sharjah Emirate, U.A.E. In: Boucharlat R, editor. Survey in Sharjah Emirate, U.A.E. on behalf of the Department of Culture, Sharjah, First Report (1984). Sharjah; 1984. p. 5–15.Google Scholar
  4. Briand BR, Dalongeville R, Ploquin A. The industries of Mleiha: mineralogical and archaeological data recovered from the site and its environments in 1990. In: Boucharlat R, editor. Archaeological surveys and excavations in the Sharjah Emirate, 1990 and 1992: A Sixth Interim Report, Sharjah. 1992. p. 45–48.Google Scholar
  5. Calley S, Santoni MA. Sounding at the prehistoric site al-Qassimiya. In: Boucharlat R, editor. Archaeological surveys and excavations in the Sharjah Emirate, 1986: A Third Preliminary Report, Sharjah. 1986. p. 13–15.Google Scholar
  6. Cauvin MC, Calley S. Preliminary report on lithic material, Appendix 1. In: Boucharlat R, editor. Survey in Sharjah Emirate, U.A.E. on behalf of the Department of Culture, Sharjah, First Report (1984). Sharjah; 1984. p. 17–20.Google Scholar
  7. Copeland L. Yabrudian and related industries: the state of research in 1996. In: Ronen A, Weinstein-Evron M, editors. Toward modern humans: the Yabrudian and Micoquian, Proceedings of a Congress Held at the University of Haifa, November 3–9, 1996. Oxford: BAR International Series; 2000. 850, p. 97–118.Google Scholar
  8. Debenath A, Dibble H. Handbook of Palaeolithic typology: volume I, Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania; 1994.Google Scholar
  9. Forster P, Matsumura S. Did early humans go north or south? Science. 2005;308:965–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gopher A, Barkai R, Shimelmitz R, Khalaily M, Lemorini C, Heshkovitz I, et al. Qesem Cave: an Amudian site in central Israel. Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society. 2005;35:65–92.Google Scholar
  11. Hours F, Copeland L, Aurenche O. Les industries Paléolithiques du Proche-Orient, essai de corrélation. L’Anthropologie. 1973;77(3/4):229–80.Google Scholar
  12. Inizan ML. Premiers résultats des fouilles préhistoriques de la région de Khor. In: Tixier J, editor. Mission Archéologique Française à Qatar. Doha: Dar al-Uloom; 1980. p. 51–97.Google Scholar
  13. Jagher R. The Central Oman Palaeolithic Survey: recent research in Southern Arabia and reflection on the prehistoric evidence. In: Petraglia MD, Rose JI, editors. The evolution of human populations in Arabia: paleoenvironments, prehistory and genetics. The Netherlands: Springer; 2009. p. 139–50.Google Scholar
  14. Jelinek AJ. The Amudian in the context of the Mugharan tradition at the Tabun Cave (Mt. Carmel), Israel. In: Mellars P, editor. The emergence of modern humans. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1990. p. 81–90.Google Scholar
  15. Jelinek AJ. Problems in chronology in the Middle Paleolithic and the first appearance of modern humans in Western Eurasia. In: Akazawa T, Aoki K, Kimura T, editors. The evolution and dispersal of modern humans in Asia. Tokyo: Hokusen-sha Press; 1992. p. 253–76.Google Scholar
  16. Kapel H. Atlas of the Stone-Age cultures of Qatar. Denmark: Aarhus University Press; 1967.Google Scholar
  17. Leakey M, Tobias PV, Martyn JE, Leakey R. An Acheulian industry with prepared core technique and the discovery of a contemporary hominin mandible at Lake Baringo, Kenya. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1969;3:48–76.Google Scholar
  18. McBrearty S. The Middle Pleistocene of East Africa. In: Barham L, Robson-Brown K, editors. Human roots, Africa and Asia in the Middle Pleistocene. Bristol: Western Academic and Specialist Press; 2001. p. 81–98.Google Scholar
  19. Millet M. The lithic industry. In: Boucharlet R, editor. Archaeological surveys and excavations in the Sharjah Emirate, 1988. Sharjah; 1997. p. 24–30.Google Scholar
  20. Monigal K. The Levantine Leptolithic: blade technology from the Lower Paleolithic to the dawn of the Upper Paleolithic. Ph.D. dissertation, Southern Methodist University, Dallas; 2002.Google Scholar
  21. Parker AG, Rose JI. Climate change and human origins in southern Arabia. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies. 2008;38:25–42.Google Scholar
  22. Petraglia MD, Alsharekh A. The Middle Paleolithic of Arabia: implications for modern human behaviour and dispersals. Antiquity. 2003;77(298):671–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piette E. Nomenclature des temps anthropiques primitifs. Laon: Imprimerie Le Vasseur; 1880.Google Scholar
  24. Pleurdeau D. Human technical behavior in the African Middle Stone Age: the lithic assemblage from Porc-Epic Dave (Dire Dawa, Ethiopia). African Archaeological Review. 2005;22(4):177–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rose JI. The Question of Upper Pleistocene connections between East Africa and South Arabia. Current Anthropology. 2004;45(4): 551–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rose JL. Among Arabian sands: defining the Paleolithic of Southern Arabia. Ph.D. dissertation, Southern Methodist University, Dallas; 2006.Google Scholar
  27. Rose JI. The Arabian Corridor Migration Model: archaeological evidence for hominin dispersal into Oman during the Middle and Upper Pleistocene. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies. 2007;37:219–37.Google Scholar
  28. Rose JI, Usik VI. The “Upper Paleolithic” of South Arabia. In: Petraglia MD, Rose JI, editors. The evolution of human populations in Arabia: paleoenvironments, prehistory and genetics. The Netherlands: Springer; 2009. p. 169–85.Google Scholar
  29. Scott-Jackson JE. Lower and Middle Paleolithic artefacts from deposits mapped as clay-with-flints – a new synthesis with significant implications for the earliest occupation of Britain. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2000. p. 125–38.Google Scholar
  30. Scott-Jackson JE, Scott-Jackson WB, Jasim SA. Middle Paleolithic – or what? New sites in Sharjah, UAE. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies. 2007;37:277–9.Google Scholar
  31. Scott-Jackson JE, Scott-Jackson WB, Rose JI. Upper Pleistocene stone-tools from Sharjah, UAE. Initial investigations: interim report. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies. 2008;38.Google Scholar
  32. Smith GH. New prehistoric sites in Oman. Journal of Oman Studies. 1977;3:71–81.Google Scholar
  33. Tryon C. ‘Early’ Middle Stone Age lithic technology of the Kapthurin formation (Kenya). Current Anthropology. 2006;47(2):367–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Uerpmann H-P, Uerpmann M, Kuttered J, Handel M, Jasim SA, Marks A. The Stone Age sequence of Jebel Faya in the Emirate of Sharjah (UAE). Paper presented at the Seminar for Arabian Studies 2007; 2007.Google Scholar
  35. Usik V. The variants of Levallois method of Middle Paleolithic industries of Ukraine. In: Kulakovska L, editor. The Middle Paleolithic variability on the territory of Ukraine. Kiev: Shliakh; 2003. p. 32–62.Google Scholar
  36. Wendorf F, Schild R. A Middle Stone Age sequence from the Central Rift valley, Ethiopia. Warsaw: Polska Akademia Nauk; 1974.Google Scholar
  37. Whalen N, Siraj-Ali J, Davis W (1984) Excavation of Acheulean sites near Saffaqah, Saudi Arabia. Atal8:43–45Google Scholar
  38. Whalen N, Siraj-Ali J, Sindi H, Pease D, and Badein M (1988) A complex of sites in the Jeddah-Wadi Fatima Area. Atal11:77–87Google Scholar
  39. Zarins, J 2001 The Land of Incense: archaeological work in the Governorate of Dhofar, Sultanate of Oman, 1990–1995. Muscat: Sultan Qaboos University PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Scott-Jackson
    • 1
  • William Scott-Jackson
    • 1
  • Jeffrey I. Rose
    • 2
  1. 1.PADMAC UnitInstitute of Archaeology, University of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Anthropology and GeographyOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations