Abstract
Quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) are more and more discussed and used in several situations. Their application to legislative purposes stimulated a large debate in Europe on the recent legislation on industrial chemicals. To correctly assess the suitability of QSAR, the discussion has to be done depending on the target. Different targets modify the model evaluation and use. The application of QSAR for legislative purposes requires keeping into account the use of the values obtained through the QSAR models. False negatives should be minimized. The model should be robust, verified, and validated. Reproducibility and transparency are other important characteristics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_396/l_39620061230en00010 849.pdf
C. Hansch et al., The correlation of biological activity of plant growth-regulators and chloromycetin derivatives with hammett constants and partition coefficients. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 2817–2824 (1963)
J. Hermens, Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships for Predicting Fish Toxicity, in Practical Applications of Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships in Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, ed. by W. Karcher, J. Devillers (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990), pp. 263–280
G.C. Gini, A.R. Katritzky (Eds), Predictive Toxicology of Chemicals: Experiences and Impact of AI Tools. AAAI 1999 Spring Symposium Series. (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, 1999).
J. Devillers (ed), Neural Networks in QSAR and Drug Design (Academic Press, London, 1996)
J. Devillers (ed), Genetic Algorithms in Molecular Modeling (Academic Press, London, 1996)
R. Todeschini, V. Consonni, Handbook of Molecular Descriptors (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000)
M. Karelson, Molecular Descriptors in QSAR/QSPR (Wiley, New York, 2000)
A.A. Toropov, E. Benfenati, SMILES in QSPR/QSAR modeling: Results and perspectives. Curr. Drug Dis. Technol. 4, 77–116 (2007)
E. Benfenati, A. Roncaglioni, In silico-aided prediction of biological properties of chemicals: Oestrogen receptor-mediated effects. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 441 (2008)
Estimation Programme Interface (EPI) Suite. US EPA. http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm
J. Devillers, Application of QSARs in Aquatic Toxicology, in Computational Toxicology: Risk Assessment for Pharmaceutical and Environmental Chemicals, ed. by S. Ekins (Wiley, Hoboken, 2007), pp. 651–675
E. Benfenati et al., Validation of the Models, in Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes, ed. by E. Benfenati (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 185–199
L. Eriksson et al., Methods for reliability, uncertainty assessment, and applicability evaluations of regression based and classification QSARs. Environ. Health Perspect. 111, 1361–1375 (2003)
A. Golbraikh, A. Tropsha, Beware of q2!. J. Mol. Graph Model. 20, 269–276 (2002)
R. Benigni et al., The expanding role of predictive toxicology: An update on the (Q)SAR models for mutagens and carcinogens. J. Environ. Sci. Health C 25, 53–97 (2007)
E. Benfenati, Predicting toxicity through computers: a changing world. Chem. Cent. J. 1, 32 (2007)
OECD. OECD Principles for the Validation, for Regulatory Purposes, of (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationship Models. Paris, France. http://www.oecd.org/document/23/0,3343,en_2649_34379_33957015_1_1_1_1,00.html
E. Benfenati, The specificity of the QSAR models for regulatory purposes: the example of the DEMETRA project. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18, 209–220 (2007)
DEMETRA EC project. http://www.demetra-tox.net
TOPKAT software. http://www.accelrys.com/products/topkat/
MULTICASE software. http://multicase.com/products/prod09.htm
HazardExpert software. http://www.compudrug.com/
DEREK software. http://www.lhasalimited.org/index.php?cat = 2&sub_cat = 64
OECD QSAR Toolbox. http://www.oecd.org/document/23 /0,3343,en_2649_37465_33957015_1_1_1_37465,00.html
E. Benfenati (ed), Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007)
C. Porcelli et al., Regulatory perspectives in the use and validation of QSAR. A case study: DEMETRA model for daphnia toxicity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 491–496 (2008)
CAESAR EC project. http://www.caesar-project.eu
CHEMOMENTUM EC project. http://www.chemomentum.org
OSIRIS project. http://www.osiris-reach.eu
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the financial contribution of the European Commission’s CAESAR (Contract SSPI 022674), OSIRIS (Contract GOCE-CT-2007-037017), and CHEMOMENTUM projects (Contract MIF1-CT-2006-039036).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benfenati, E. (2009). QSAR Models for Regulatory Purposes: Experiences and Perspectives. In: Leszczynski, J., Shukla, M. (eds) Practical Aspects of Computational Chemistry. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2687-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2687-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2686-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2687-3
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)