Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Managing Weeds with a Dualistic Approach of Prevention and Control: A Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Agriculture

Abstract

Scientists have theorized that weed management would be more efficient if prevention tactics were integrated with control tactics. The goals of prevention are to reduce weed community density and improve crop tolerance to weeds. Here we describe the impact of this approach in the semiarid steppe of the United States. As a result, producers have reduced herbicide inputs and costs by 50% compared to conventional practices. Critical factors for success with this approach are rotation design and no-till practices. Rotations comprised of two cool-season crops followed by two warm-season crops are the most disruptive of weed population growth. The impact of rotation design on weed community density is enhanced by no-till. Crop tolerance to weeds is improved by systems of cultural tactics. The tolerance is greatest when three tactics are combined together. This dualistic approach of prevention and control effectively controls weeds with four-crop rotations such that herbicides are not needed in some crops of the rotation. Weed density is so low that crop yield is not affected by weed interference. With this approach, herbicides are a choice rather than a requirement for cropping success in the semiarid steppe of the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson R.L. (1998) Seedling emergence of winter annual grasses as affected by limited tillage and crop canopy. Weed Technol. 12, 262–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. (1999) Cultural strategies reduce weed densities in summer annual crops. Weed Technol. 13, 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. (2000a) A cultural systems approach eliminates the need for herbicides in semiarid proso millet. Weed Technol. 14, 602–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. (2000b) Cultural systems to aid weed management in semiarid corn. Weed Technol. 14, 630–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. (2003) An ecological approach to strengthen weed management in the semiarid Great Plains. Adv. Agron. 80, 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. (2004) Impact of sub-surface tillage on weed dynamics in the Central Great Plains. Weed Technol. 18, 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. (2005a) A multi-tactic approach to manage weed population dynamics in crop rotations. Agron. J. 97, 1579–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L. (2005b) Improving sustainability of cropping systems in the Central Great Plains. J. Sustain. Agr. 26, 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R.L., Bowman R.A., Nielsen D.C., Vigil M.F., Aiken R.M., Benjamin J.G. (1999) Alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains. J. Prod. Agric. 12, 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banting J.D., Molberg E.S., Gephardt J.P. (1973) Seasonal emergence and persistence of green foxtail Can. J. Plant Sci. 53, 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernoux M., Cerri C.C., Cerri C.E.P., Neto M.S., Metay A., Perrin A.S., Scopel E., Razafimbelo T., Blavet D., Piccolo M.C., Pavei M., Milne E. (2006) Cropping systems, carbon sequestration and erosion in Brazil, a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 26, 1–8. DOI: 10.1051/agro:2005055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges D.C. (1994) Impact of weeds on human endeavors. Weed Technol. 8, 392–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen D.A., Anderson R.L., Blackshaw R.E., Maxwell B. (2002) Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains. Agron. J. 94, 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman J.A., Mortensen D.A., Martin A.R. (1999) Influence of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) density variation on weed management outcomes. Weed Sci. 47, 81–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donald W.W., Kitchen N.R., Sudduth K.A. (2001) Between-row mowing plus banded herbicide to control annual weeds and reduce herbicide use in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15, 576–584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egley G.H., Williams R.D. (1990) Decline of weed seeds and seedling emergence over 5 years as affected by soil disturbance. Weed Sci. 38, 504–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farahani H.J., Peterson G.A., Westfall D.G. (1998) Dryland cropping intensification: a fundamental solution to efficient use of precipitation. Adv. Agron. 64, 197–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferron P., Deguine J.P. (2005) Crop protection, biological control, habitat management and integrated farming. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 25, 17–24. DOI: 10.1051/agro: 2004050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forcella F., Eradat-Oskoui K., Wagner S.W. (1993) Application of weed seedbank ecology to low-input crop management. Ecol. Appl. 3, 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman D.W., Lavy T.L. (1978) Plant competition for atrazine. Weed Sci. 26, 94–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knodel J.J., Charlet L.D. (2002) Biology and integrated pest management of the sunflower stem weevil in the Great Plains. North Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin E-821, 8 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis W.J., van Lenteren J.G., Phatak S.C., Tumlinson J.H. (1997) A total system approach to sustainable pest management. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12243–12248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen D.A., Bastiaans L., Sattin M. (2000) The role of ecology in the development of weed management systems: an outlook. Weed Res. 40, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan J.T., Blackshaw R.E., Harker K.N., Clayton G.W. (2006) Wheat seeding rate influences herbicide performance in wild oat (Avena fatua L.). Agron. J. 98, 815–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedigo L.P. (1995) Closing the gap between IPM theory and practice. J. Agr. Entomol. 12, 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popay A.I., Cox T.I., Ingle A., Kerr R. (1994) Effects of soil disturbance on weed seedling emergence and its long-term decline. Weed Res. 34, 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts H.A. (1981) Seed banks in soils. Adv. Appl. Biol. 6, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar G.R., Mortimer A.M. (1976) An approach to the study of the population dynamics of plants with special reference to weeds. Adv. Appl. Biol. 1, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer E.E., Westra P., Lybecker D.W. (1992) Controlling weeds in corn (Zea mays) rows with an in-row cultivator versus decisions made by a computer model. Weed Sci. 42, 593–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streibig J.C. (1979) Numerical methods illustrating the phytosociology of crops in relation to weed flora. J. Appl. Ecol. 16, 577–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas A.G., Banting J.D., Bowes G. (1986) Longevity of green foxtail seeds in a Canadian prairie soil. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66, 189–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber E., Gut D. (2005) A survey of weeds that are increasingly spreading in Europe. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 25, 109–121. DOI: 10.1051/agro:2004061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks G.A., Crutchfield D.A., Burnside, O.C. (1994) Influence of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch and metolachlor on corn (Zea mays) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 42, 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkle M.E., Leavitt J.R.C., Burnside O.C. (1981) Effects of weed density on herbicide absorption and bioactivity. Weed Sci. 29, 405–409.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA, 2923 Medary Avenue, Brookings, South Dakota, USA

    Randy L. Anderson

Authors
  1. Randy L. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randy L. Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. INRA-CMSE-PME, rue Sully 17, Dijon CX, 21065, France

    Eric Lichtfouse

  2. Unite d¿Écodéveloppement, INRA-SAD, Avignon CX 09, 84914, France

    Mireille Navarrete

  3. UMR AGIR, INRA, Toulouse CX, 31326, France

    Philippe Debaeke

  4. UMR SADAPT, INRA-INA PG, Thiverval-Grignon, 78850, France

    Souchere Véronique

  5. Dépt. Environnement et Agronomie, INRA Avignon, Avignon CX 9, 84914, France

    Caroline Alberola

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, R.L. (2009). Managing Weeds with a Dualistic Approach of Prevention and Control: A Review. In: Lichtfouse, E., Navarrete, M., Debaeke, P., Véronique, S., Alberola, C. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation