Advertisement

Educational Change in Finland

  • Pasi Sahlberg
Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 23)

Abstract

In the early 1970s – a century after the first Finnish novel Seven Brothers was published – Finland was known for its long-distance runners, introverted people, saunas on lakes, and successful political coexistence with the Soviet Union. In those days, the Finnish economy was characterized by traditional agriculture and it relied on forestry and heavy-metal industries. Being a rather poor member within a much wealthier family of industrial market economies, Finland was ranked in the lower half of the OECD nations. The Finnish education system had only a few features that attracted any praise among international observers and many education policy ideas were adopted from its wealthier Western neighbor, Sweden. Indeed, Finland’s education system was recognized internationally exceptional only on one account: Finnish 10-year-olds were among the best readers in the world (Allerup & Mejding, 2003; Elley, 1992).

Keywords

Social Capital Education System Education Policy Education Reform Educational Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Henry Heikkinen and David Oldroyd for their constructive suggestions on this chapter. I also wish to acknowledge several colleagues in Finland who provided their comments and corrections to the data and the conclusions presented above. However, any lack of clarity, errors, and omissions are the author’s responsibility alone.

References

  1. Adams, R. J. (2003). Response to ‘Cautions on OECD’s recent educational survey (PISA)’. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aho, E., Pitkänen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Alasuutari, P. (2004). Sunnittelutaloudesta kilpailutalouteen. Miten muutos oli ideologisesti mahdollinen? [From planned economy to competition economy. How was the change ideologically possible?] Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 69(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
  4. Allerup, P., & Mejding, J. (2003). Reading achievement in 1991 and 2000. In S. Lie, P. Linnakylä, & A. Roe (Eds.), Northern lights on PISA: Unity and diversity in Nordic countries in PISA 2000 (pp. 133–146). Oslo: University of Oslo, Department of Teacher Education and School Development.Google Scholar
  5. Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). The McKinsey report: How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. London: McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
  7. Bautier, E., & Rayon, P. (2007). What PISA really evaluates: Literacy or students’ universes of reference? Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bracey, G. (2005). Research: Put out over PISA. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(10), 797.Google Scholar
  9. Carnoy, M. (with A. Gove, & J. Marshall). (2007). Cuba’s academic advantage. Why students in Cuba do better in school. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M., & Himanen, P. (2002). The information society and the welfare state. The Finnish model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dohn, N. (2007). Knowledge and skills for PISA – Assessing the assessment. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elley, W. B. (Ed.). (1992). How in the world do students read? Hamburg: Grindeldruck GMBH.Google Scholar
  13. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability. System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gersick, C. (1991). Revolutionary change theories. A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10–36.Google Scholar
  15. Goldstein, H. (2004). International comparisons of student attainment: Some issues arising from the PISA study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11(3), 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grubb, N. (2007). Dynamic inequality and intervention: Lessons for a small country. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 105–114.Google Scholar
  17. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, A. (2008). The fourth way of change: Towards an age of inspiration and sustainability. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Change wars. Toronto: Solution Tree.Google Scholar
  19. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, A., Halasz, G., & Pont, B. (2007). School leadership for systemic improvement in Finland. A Case study report for the OECD activity “Improving School Leadership”. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  22. Hirvi, V. (1996). Koulutuksen rytminvaihdos. 1990-luvun koulutuspolitiikka Suomessa [The rhythm change in education. Finnish education policy in the 1990s]. Helsinki: Otava.Google Scholar
  23. House, E., & McQuillan, P. (1998). Three perspectives on school reform. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 198–213). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  24. Itkonen, T., & Jahnukainen, M. (2007). An analysis of accountability policies in Finland and the United States. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2006). Research-based teacher education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish teacher educators. Research Report 25. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  26. Jussila, J., & Saari, S. (Eds.). (2000). Teacher education as a future-molding factor: International evaluation of teacher education in Finnish universities. Helsinki: Higher Education Evaluation Council.Google Scholar
  27. Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe. The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kivi, A. (2005). Seven brothers. [Seitsemän veljestä, first published in 1870, translated by R. Impola]. Beaverton: Aspasia Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Kokkinen, A., Jalava, J., Hjerppe, R., & Hannikainen, M. (2007). Catching up in Europe: Finland’s convergence to Sweden and EU15. Working Papers 93. Helsinki: Pellervo Economic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Kupari, P., & Välijärvi, J. (Eds.). (2005). Osaaminen kestävällä pohjalla. PISA 2003 Suomessa [Competences on solid ground. PISA 2003 in Finland]. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  31. Lampinen, O. (1998). Suomen koulutusjärjestelmän kehitys [Development of the Finnish education system]. Tampere: Tammer-paino.Google Scholar
  32. Laukkanen, R. (2008). Finnish strategy for high-level education for all. In N. C. Sognel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 305–324). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Levin, B. (1998). An epidemic of education policy: (what) can we learn from each other? Comparative Education, 34(2), 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, R. (2005). Finland, cultural lone wolf. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  35. Linnakylä, P. (2004). Finland. In H. Döbert, E. Klieme, & W. Stroka (Eds.), Conditions of school performance in seven countries. A quest for understanding the international variation of PISA results (pp. 150–218). Munster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzales, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 international science report: Findings from IEA’s repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.Google Scholar
  37. Messner, R. (2003). PISA und Allgermeinbildung. Zeitschrift fur Padagogik, 48(3), 400–412.Google Scholar
  38. Ministry of Education. (2005). Opetusministeriön hallinnonalan tuottavuusohjelma 2006–2010 [Education Sector Productivity Programme 2006–2010]. Opetusministeriön julkaisuja 2005:32. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  39. Ministry of Education. (2007). Development plan for education and research 2007–2012. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  40. Nagy, P. (1996). International comparisons of student achievement in mathematics and science: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Journal of Education, 21(4), 396–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 1.
    Nichols, S., & Berliner, D. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  42. Niukko, S. (2006). OECD in the eyes of Finnish education policy makers. In J. Kallo & R. Rinne (Eds.), Supranational regimes and national education policies – encountering challenge. Research in educational sciences 24 (pp. 299–333). Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  43. OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  45. OECD. (2007a). Education at a glance. OECD indicators 2007. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  46. OECD. (2007b). PISA 2006. Science competencies for tomorrow’s world (Vol. 1). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  47. OECD. (2007c). No more failures. Ten steps to equity in education. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  48. Pajarinen, M., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2001). Maat kilpailevat investoinneista: Teknologia vetää sijoituksia Suomeen. [Nations competing for investments: Technology attracts foreign investments to Finland]. B 173. Helsinki: ETLA.Google Scholar
  49. Phillips, D. (2005). Policy borrowing in education: Frameworks for analysis. In J. Zajda (Ed.), International handbook on globalisation, education and policy research. Global pedagogies and policies (pp. 23–34). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Prais, S. J. (2003). Cautions on OECD’s recent educational survey (PISA). Oxford Review of Education, 29(2), 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prais, S. J. (2004). Cautions on OECD’s recent educational survey (PISA): Rejoinder to OECD’s response. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Riley, K., & Torrance, H. (2003). Big change question: As national policy-makers seek to find solutions to national education issues, do international comparisons such as TIMSS and PISA create a wider understanding, or do they serve to promote the orthodoxies of international agencies? Journal of Educational Change, 4(4), 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rinne, R. (2006). Like a model pupil? Globalization, Finnish education policies and pressure from supranational organizations. In R. Rinne & J. Kallo (Eds.), Supranational regimes and national education policies – encountering challenge. Research in Educational Sciences 24 (pp. 183–215). Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  54. Robitaille, D. F., & Garden, R. A. (Eds.). (1989). The IEA study of mathematics II: Context and outcomes of school mathematics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  55. Routti, J., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2006). Finland as a knowledge economy. Elements of success and lessons learned. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  56. Saari, J. (2006). Suomen mallin institutionaalinen rakenne [The institutional structure of the Finnish model]. In J. Saari (Ed.), Suomen malli – Murroksesta menestykseen? [The Finnish model – From reformation to success] Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.Google Scholar
  57. Sahlberg, P. (2004). Teaching and globalization. International Research Journal of Managing Global Transitions, 2(1), 65–83.Google Scholar
  58. Sahlberg, P. (2006a). Education reform for raising economic competitiveness. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sahlberg, P. (2006b). Raising the bar: How Finland responds to the twin challenge of secondary education? Profesorado, 10(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  60. Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22, 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 2.
    Sahlberg, P. (2010). Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change, 11(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Salo, P., & Johnson, P. (2008). Action research revealing paradoxes and tensions of education reforms. Lessons learned in Finland. In E. Furu, P. Salo, & K. Rönneman (Eds.), Nurturing praxis. Action research in partnership between school and university in a Nordic light. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Schleicher, A. (2006). The economics of knowledge: Why education is key for Europe’s success. Brussels: The Lisbon Council.Google Scholar
  64. Schleicher, A. (2007). Can competencies assessed by PISA be considered the fundamental school knowledge 15-year-olds should possess? Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simola, H., Rinne, R., & Kivirauma, J. (2002). Abdication of the education state or just shifting responsibilities? The appearance of a new system of reason in constructing educational governance and social exclusion/inclusion in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 46(3), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ståhle, P. (Ed.). (2006). Five steps for Finland’s future. Technology Review 202. Helsinki: Tekes.Google Scholar
  68. Ståhle, P., & Wilenius, M. (2006). Luova tietopääoma: Tulevaisuuden kestävä kilpailuetu [Creative intellectual capital: Sustainable competitive advantage of the future]. Helsinki: Edita Publishing.Google Scholar
  69. Statistics Finland. (2007). Education. Retrieved from the Internet at http://www.stat.fi/til/kou_en.html, on 30 December, 2007.
  70. Valijarvi, J., Kupari, P., Linnakyla, P., Reinikainen, P., Sulkunen, S., Törnroos, J., et al. (2007). Finnish success in PISA and some reasons behind it II. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  71. Välijärvi, J., Linnakylä, P., Kupari, P., Reinikainen, P., & Arffman, I. (2002). Finnish success in PISA and some reasons behind it. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  72. Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Westbury, I., Hansen, S.-E., Kansanen, P., & Björkvist, O. (2005). Teacher education for research-based practice in expanded roles: Finland’s experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for International Mobility and Cooperation CIMOHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations