Towards a Formalism for Expressing Structures of Consciousness

  • Eduard Marbach


The objective of developing a formalism in Phenomenology is threefold. First, a formalism should help the phenomenologist to put down in more precise and stable form what this or that means in his or her attempt reflectively to describe conscious experiences. Second, it should facilitate communication of phenomenological findings. Third, it should advance the elaboration of agreement procedures among researchers of consciousness using first-person methodologies. To enable intersubjective agreement concerning essentially subjective, first-person data would, in itself, seem to be a valuable goal for an investigation of consciousness within philosophical Phenomenology.1 Moreover, such agreement is no doubt requisite for successfully integrating phenomenological data within scientific studies of consciousness in the Cognitive Sciences.2


Conscious Experience Double Object Mountain Landscape Pictorial Object Philosophical Phenomenology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Borsato A (2009) Innere Wahrnehmung und innere Vergegenwärtigung. Epistemata Philosophie, Königshausen & Neumann, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
  2. Chalmers D (1999) First-person methods in the science of consciousness. Consciousness Bulletin, Consciousness studies, Department of psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, pp 8–11Google Scholar
  3. Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error. Emotion, reason, and the human brain. G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Dennett DC (1991) Consciousness explained. Little, Brown, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Frege G (1882a) Über den Zweck der Begriffsschrift: Suppl. zur Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft, 16 (Neue Folge 9), 1882/1883 [1–10]. Reprinted in Frege, Angelelli (ed) 1964, pp 97–106Google Scholar
  6. Frege G (1882b) Über die wissenschaftliche Berechtigung einer Begriffsschrift. In: Angelellli (ed) Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik. 81, pp 48–56. Reprinted in Frege, 1964, pp 106–114Google Scholar
  7. Frege G (1964). Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze. Zweite Auflage. Mit E. Husserls und H. Scholz’ Anmerkungen herausgegeben von Ignacio Angelelli. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  8. Frith C (2002). How can we share experiences? TRENDS Cogn Sci 6(9):374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher S (1997) Mutual enlightenment: recent phenomenology in cognitive science. J Conscious Stud 4(3):195–214Google Scholar
  10. Gallagher S (2003) Phenomenology and experimental design. Towards a phenomenologically enlightened experimental science. J Conscious Stud 10:9–10Google Scholar
  11. Gregory RL (1970) The intelligent eye. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregory RL (1974) Concepts and mechanisms of perception. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Husserl E (1977) Phenomenological psychology. Lectures, summer semester 1925 (trans: John S). Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  14. Husserl E (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (trans: Kersten F). Martinus Nijhoff (originally published in 1913), The HagueGoogle Scholar
  15. Husserl E (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band, Erster Teil: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Ursula P (ed). Martinus Nijhoff (originally published 1901), The HagueGoogle Scholar
  16. Husserl E (1989) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution (trans: Rojcewicz R and Schuwer A). Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Husserl E (1997) Thing and space. Lectures of 1907 (trans: Rojcewicz R). Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  18. Husserl E (2005) Phantasy, image consciousness, and memory (1898–1925) Edmund Husserl, Collected Works, Volume XI (trans: John BB). Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  19. Kern I (1975). Idee und Methode der Philosophie. Leitgedanken für eine Theorie derVernunft. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Kosslyn SM, Ganis G and Thompson WL (2001) Neural foundations of imagery. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kriegel U (2007). The phenomenologically manifest. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 6:115–136 (special issue on Dennett and Heterophenomenology)Google Scholar
  22. Lloyd D (2004) Radiant cool. A novel theory of consciousness. A Bradford Book. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Marbach E (1993) Mental representation and consciousness. Towards a phenomenological theory of representation and reference. Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin WM (2005). Husserl and the logic of consciousness. In: David WS, Amie LT (eds) Phenomenology and philosophy of mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 203–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Metzinger T (1995) Editor’s introduction. The problem of consciousness. In: Thomas M (ed) Conscious experience. Schöningh/Imprint Academic, Thorverton/Padeborn, pp 3–37Google Scholar
  26. Noë A (2007) The critique of pure phenomenology. Phenomenol Cognit Sci 6:231–245 (special issue on Dennett and Heterophenomenology. Guest Editor: Alva Noë)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roy J-M (2007) Heterophenomenology and phenomenological scepticism. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 6:1–20 (special issue on Dennett and Heterophenomenology)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmicking D (2005) Is there imaginary loudness? Reconsidering phenomenological method. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 4:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Gelder T (1996/1997) Wooden iron? Husserlian phenomenology meets cognitive science. In Jean P, Francisco JV, Bernard P, Roy J-M (eds) Naturalizing phenomenology. Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1999), pp 245–265Google Scholar
  30. Varela FJ (1996) Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. J Conscious Stud 3(4):330–349Google Scholar
  31. Yoshimi J (2007) Mathematizing phenomenology. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 6:271–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zahavi D (2007). Killing the straw man: Dennett and phenomenology. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 6:21–43 (special issue on Dennett and Heterophenomenology)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduard Marbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Prof. emer. for Phenomenology and Philosophy of MindInstitute of Philosophy, University of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations