Advertisement

IW - “The Man Who Lost His Body”

  • David McNeill
  • Liesbet Quaeghebeur
  • Susan Duncan
Chapter

Abstract

Mr. Ian Waterman, sometimes referred to as ‘IW’, suffered at age 19 a sudden, total deafferentation of his body from the neck down - the near total loss of all the touch, proprioception, and limb spatial position senses that tell you, without looking, where your body is and what it is doing. The loss followed a never-diagnosed fever that is believed to have set off an auto-immune reaction. The immediate behavioral effect was immobility, even though IW’s motor system was unaffected and there was no paralysis. The problem was not lack of movement per se but lack of control. Upon awakening after 3 days, IW nightmarishly found that he had no control over what his body did - he was unable to sit up, walk, feed himself or manipulate objects; none of the ordinary actions of everyday life, let alone the complex actions required for his vocation. To imagine what deafferentation is like, try this experiment suggested by Shaun Gallagher: sit down at a table (something IW could not have done at first) and place your hands below the surface; open and close one hand, close the other and extend a finger; put the open hand over the closed hand, and so forth. You know at all times what your hands are doing and where they are but IW would not know any of this - he would know that he had willed his hands to move but, without vision, would have no idea of what they are doing or where they are located.

Keywords

Instrumental Action Idea Unit Growth Point Linguistic Meaning Bodily Expression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Mind Bridge project, founded by the European Commission under the sixth Framework programme, contract no. 043457

References

  1. Bayne T (2004) Closing the gap? Some questions for neurophenomenology, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 4, 349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braddock G (2001) Beyond reflection in naturalized phenomenology. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(11): 3–16Google Scholar
  3. Cole J (1995) Pride and a daily marathon. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Duncan S (2006) Co-expressivity of speech and gesture: manner of motion in Spanish, English, and Chinese. In: Proceedings of the 27th Berkeley Linguistic Society Annual Meeting, [Meeting in 2001.] Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Linguistics, 1203 Dwinelle Hall, Berkeley, CA, pp 353–370Google Scholar
  5. Firbas J (1971) On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Philologica Pragensia 8:135–144Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press (Clarendon), OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gelb A, Goldstein K (1925) Über Farbennamenamnesie. Psychologische Forschung 6:127–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldin-Meadow S, Nusbaum H, Garber P, Church RB (2001) Transitions in learning: evidence for simultaneously activated hypotheses. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1–16Google Scholar
  9. Goldin-Meadow S (2003) Hearing gesture: how our hands help us think. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldin-Meadow S (1999) The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends Cogn Sci 3(11):419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iverson JM, Goldin-Meadow S (1997) What’s communication got to do with it? Gesture in congenitally blind children. Dev Psychol 33:453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kendon A (1988) How gestures can become like words. In: Poyatos F (ed) Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication. Hogrefe, Toronto, pp 131–141Google Scholar
  13. Mayberry R, Jaques J (2000) Gesture production during stuttered speech: insights into the nature of gesture-speech integration. In: McNeill D (ed) Language and gesture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McClave E, Kim H, Tamer R, Mileff M (2008) Linguistic movements of the head in Arabic, Bulgarian, Korean, and African American Vernacular English. GestureGoogle Scholar
  15. McNeill D, Duncan SD (2000) Growth points in thinking for speaking. In: McNeill D (ed) Language and gesture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McNeill D, Duncan S, Cole J, Gallagher S, Bertenthal B (2008) Growth points from the very beginning. Int Stud 9:117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McNeill D, Duncan S, Franklin A, Kimbara I, Parrill F, Welji H. In press. Mind-merging. In: Ezequiel M (ed) Expressing oneself/expressing one’s self: communication, language, cognition, and identity: a festschrift in honor of Robert M. Krauss. Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  18. McNeill D (1992) Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  19. McNeill D (2005) Gesture and thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  20. Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith C). Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller C (forthcoming) Metaphors - dead and alive, sleeping and waking. A dynamic view. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  22. Nobe S (2000) Where do most spontaneous representational gestures actually occur with respect to speech? In: McNeill D (ed) Language and gesture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Okrent A (2002) A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics. In: Meier RP, Cormier K, Quinto-Pozos D (eds) Modality and structure in signed and spoken language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Overgaard M (2004) On the naturalising of phenomenology, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 4, 365–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Overgaard M, Fehl K, Mouridsen K, Cleeremans A (2008) Seeing without seeing? Degraded conscious vision in a blindsight patient, PLoS ONE, 3,8, 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parrill F (2007) Metagesture: an analysis of theoretical discourse about multimodal language. In: Duncan SD, Cassell J, Levy E (eds) Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramachandran VS, Blakeslee S (1998) Phantoms in the brain: probing the mysteries of the human mind. William Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Rieber RW, Carton AS (eds) (1987) The collected works of LS Vygotsky, vol 1: Problems of general psychology. Including the volume thinking and speech (intro. and trans: Norris M). Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Roy JM, Petitot J, Pachoud B, Varela FJ (1999) Beyond the gap: an introduction to naturalising phenomenology, in Petitot et al. (eds.): Naturalising Phenomenology, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Severance E, Washburn MF (1907) The loss of associative power in words after long fixation. Am J Psychol 18:182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Slobin DI (1987) Thinking for Speaking. In: Aske J, Beery N, Michaelis L, Filip H (eds) Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the berkeley linguistic society. Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, pp 435–445Google Scholar
  32. Varela FJ (1996) Neurophenomenology: Amethodological remedy to the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3(4): 330–350Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • David McNeill
    • 1
  • Liesbet Quaeghebeur
    • 2
  • Susan Duncan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Center for Philosophical PsychologyUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations