Advertisement

Husserl and Language

  • Peer F. Bundgaard
Chapter

Abstract

From a purely quantitative point of view, Edmund Husserl has devoted a rather small amount of time and space to the study of language proper. Essentially, his contributions within this domain amount to the description of language use in the First Logical Investigation (Husserl 1901), and the determination of the essential properties of language as such (independent of any specific use) in the Fourth Logical Investigation. Otherwise, language is only sparsely dealt with in Husserl’s writings: the unpublished note “On the Logic of Signs (Semiotics)” (Husserl 1890) anticipates the distinction between “expression” and “index” which constitutes the starting point of the First Logical Investigation; i.e. the difference between a linguistic or any other sign bestowed with intentional meaning and any type of sign which is immediately or physically linked to its meaning: smoke → fire; scar → wound; weathercock → wind, etc.); Formal and Transcendental Logic (Husserl 1929) contains an appendix related to the theory of syntax outlined in the Fourth Logical Investigation; and, finally, a number of passages from Experience and Judgment (Husserl 1939) reexamine the relation between perceptually formed or antepredicatively structured meaning and its linguistic, predicative articulation (as we shall see this issue is also in the heart of the discussions unfolded in the Fourth Logical Investigation).

Keywords

Logical Investigation Semantic Form Syntactic Category Partial Representation Word Sign 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bar-Hillel Y (1957) Husserl’s conception of a purely logical grammar. Philos Phenomenol Res 17/3:362–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benoist J (1999) L’A priori conceptuel - Bolzano, Husserl, Schlick. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Benoist J (2001) Intentionalité et langage dans les Recherches Logiques de Husserl. PUF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Benoist J (2002) Entre acte et sens - La théorie phénoménologique de la signification. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Bühler K (1934) Theory of language - the representational function of language. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia (1990)Google Scholar
  6. Bundgaard PF (2004a) The ideal scaffolding of language: Husserl’s fourth logical investigation in the light of cognitive linguistics. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 3:49–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bundgaard PF (2004b) Configuration sémantique et combinaison syntaxique dans la IVème Recherhe logique de Husserl. Recherches husserliennes 21:3–33Google Scholar
  8. Saussure F.de 1915 Cours de linguistique générale. Payot, Paris, 1960Google Scholar
  9. Fillmore Ch. J (1982) Frame semantics. In: The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed) Linguistic in the morning calm. Hanshin Publishing Co, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  10. Gardiès J-L (1975) Esquisse d’une grammaire rationnelle. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Husserl E (1890) Zur Logik der Zeichen. In Husserliana 12. Nijhoff, Den Haag 1970, pp 340–373Google Scholar
  12. Husserl E (1900–1901) Logische Untersuchungen, 2nd edition. Max Niemayer Verlag, Tübingen. (1913/1980). English translation: Logical investigations. Routledge, London/New York, 2001Google Scholar
  13. Husserl E (1929) Formale und transzendentale Logik. Max Niemayer Verlag, Tübingen, 1981Google Scholar
  14. Husserl E (1939) Erfahrung und Urteil. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg, 1985Google Scholar
  15. Ingarden R (1931) Das literarische Kunstwerk. Max Niemayer Verlag, Tübingen, 1972Google Scholar
  16. Langacker R (1987–1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, vols. I-II. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  17. Langacker R (1991) Concept, image, and symbol. The cognitive basis of grammar. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulligan K (1988) On structure - Bühler’s linguistic and psychological examples. In: Eschenback A (ed) Karl Bühler’s theory of language. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, PA, pp 203–226Google Scholar
  19. Münch D (2002) The relation of Husserl’s logical investigations to descriptive psychology and cognitive science. In: Stjernfelt F, Zahavi D (eds) 100 years of phenomenology - logical investigations revisited. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith B (1987) Husserl, language, and the ontology of the act. In: Buzzetti D, Ferriani M (eds) Speculative grammar, universal grammar, and philosophical analysis of language. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 205–227Google Scholar
  21. Talmy L (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Tesnière L (1959) Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Kliencksieck, Paris, 1982Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peer F. Bundgaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Semiotic ResearchUniversity of AarhusAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations