Advertisement

Naturalized Phenomenology

  • Dan Zahavi
Chapter

Abstract

It is always risky to make sweeping statements about the development of philosophy, but if one were nevertheless asked to describe twentieth century philosophy in broad strokes, one noteworthy feature might be the following: Whereas important figures at the beginning of the century, figures such as Frege and Husserl, were very explicit in their rejection of naturalism (both are known for their rejection of the attempt to naturalize the laws of logic, that is, for their criticism of psychologism), the situation has changed considerably. Today many philosophers - not the least within analytical philosophy - would subscribe to some form of naturalism. In fact, naturalism is seen by many as the default metaphysical position. If you don’t subscribe to naturalism you must be subscribing to some form of Cartesian substance dualism. Thus, whereas 20 or 30 years ago one might have been inclined to characterize the development of twentieth century philosophy in terms of a linguistic turn, a turn from a philosophy of subjectivity to a philosophy of language, it might today be more apt to describe the development in terms of a turn from anti-naturalism to naturalism.

Keywords

Empirical Science Transcendental Phenomenology Transcendental Idealism Positive Science Transcendental Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aikin SF (2006) Pragmatism, naturalism, and phenomenology. Hum Stud 29:317-340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett MR, Hacker PMS (2003) Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Crick F (1995) The astonishing hypothesis. Touchstone, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Foucault M (1966) Les mot et les choses. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Gallagher S (1997) Mutual enlightenment: recent phenomenology in cognitive science. J Conscious Stud 4(3):195-214Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher S (2003) Phenomenology and experimental design. J Conscious Stud 10(9-10):85-99Google Scholar
  7. Gallagher S, Meltzoff A (1996) The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philos Psychol 9:213-236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2008) The phenomenological mind. An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidegger M (1978) Wegmarken. Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  10. Hume D (1888) A treatise of human nature. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Husserl E (1970) The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. An introduction to phenomenology (trans: Carr D). Northwestern University Press, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  12. Husserl E (1977) Phenomenological psychology: lectures, summer semester, 1925 (trans: Scanlon J). Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  13. Husserl E (1982) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book. General introduction to a pure phenomenology (trans: Kersten F). Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  14. Husserl E (1984) Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie. Vorlesungen 1906/07. Husserliana XXIV. Martinus Nijhoff, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Husserl E (1987) Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911-1921). Husserliana XXV. Martinus Nijhoff, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Husserl E (1989) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book. Studies in the phenomenology of constitution (trans: Rojcewicz R, Schuwer A). Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Husserl E (1994) Briefwechsel, Husserliana Dokumente III/1-10. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  18. Husserl E (1999) Cartesian meditations: an introduction to phenomenology (trans: Cairns D). Martinus Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  19. Husserl E (2001) Logical investigations I-II (trans: Findlay JN). Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Husserl E (2003) Transzendentaler Idealismus. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1908-1921). Husserliana XXXVI. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis M (2003) The development of self-consciousness. In: Roessler J, Eilan N (eds) Agency and self-awareness. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 275-295Google Scholar
  22. Lutz A (2002) Toward a neurophenomenology as an account of generative passages: a first empirical case study. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 1:133-167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lutz A, Thompson E (2003) Neurophenomenology: integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. J Conscious Stud 10:31-52Google Scholar
  24. McDowell J (1996) Two sorts of naturalism. In: Hursthouse R, Lawrence G, Quinn W (eds) Virtues and reasons: Philippa Foot and moral theory. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 149-179Google Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith C). Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Merleau-Ponty M (1963) The structure of behavior (trans: Fisher AL). Duquesne University Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  27. Merleau-Ponty M (1964) Signs (trans: McCleary RC). Northwestern University Press, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  28. Merleau-Ponty M (2000) Nature: course notes from the Collège de France. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  29. Moran D (2002) Making sense: Husserl’s phenomenology as transcendental idealism. In: Malpas J (ed) From Kant to Davidson: philosophy and the idea of the transcendental. Routledge, London, pp 48-74Google Scholar
  30. Roy J-M, Petitot J, Pachoud B, Varela FJ (1999) Beyond the gap: an introduction to naturalizing phenomenology. In: Petitot J, Varlea FJ, Pachoud B, Roy J-M (eds) Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp 1-83Google Scholar
  31. Ryckman T (2005) The reign of relativity: philosophy in physics 1915-1925. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Schelling FWJ (1978) System of transcendental idealism (1800) (trans: Heath P). University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, VAGoogle Scholar
  33. Sellars W (1963) Science, perception and reality. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Tatossian A (1979/1997) La phénoménologie des psychoses. L’art du comprendre, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson E (2007) Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Varela F (1996) Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy to the hard problem. J Conscious Stud 3:330-350Google Scholar
  37. Varela F (1997) The naturalization of phenomenology as the transcendence of nature. Searching for generative mutual constraints. Alter 5:355-381Google Scholar
  38. Williams B (2005) Descartes: the project of pure enquiry. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Zahavi D (2001) Husserl and transcendental intersubjectivity. A response to the linguistic-pragmatic critique. Ohio University Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  40. Zahavi D (2003) Husserl’s phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  41. Zahavi D (2005) Subjectivity and selfhood: investigating the first-person perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. Zahavi D (2008) The phenomenological tradition. In: Moran D (ed) Routledge companion to twentieth-century philosophy. Routledge, London, pp 661-692Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Zahavi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Media, Cognition and Communication & Center for Subjectivity ResearchUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations