Preferences, like beliefs, can and do change as a result of interaction with the environment and/or internal processes. This paper presents a kinematical model in which preference changes are explicated and motivated in terms of changes to the agent's quantitative degrees of belief and/or desire across some particular partition of prospects. Several basic types of such changes are identified and consistency conditions for them specified. Finally, the model is used to explain the possibility of preference loss and gain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becker, Gary. 1996. Accounting for Tastes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. van Benthem, Johan and Fenrong Liu. 2007. The Dynamics of Preference Upgrade. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17: 157–182
3. Bolker, Ethan. 1966. Functions Resembling Quotients of Measures. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 124: 292–312
4. Bowles, Samuel. 1998. Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economics Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 75–111
5. Bradley, Richard. 1999. Conditional Desirability. Theory and Decision 47: 23–55
6. Bradley, Richard. 2005. Radical Probabilism and Mental Kinematics. Philosophy of Science 72: 342–364
7. Bradley, Richard. 2007. The Kinematics of Belief and Desire. Synthese 156: 513–535
8. Bradley, Richard. 2009. Becker's Thesis and Three Models of Preference Change. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8(2): 223–242.
9. Grüne-Yanoff, Till. 2007. Why Don't You Want to Be Rich? Preference Explanations on the Basis of Causal Structure. In Topics in Contemporary Philosophy: Explanation and Causation, eds. J.K. Campbell and M. O'Rourke, Cambridge, MA. London: MIT Press.
10. Hansson, Sven-Ove. 1995. Changes in Preferences. Theory and Decision 38: 1–28
11. Hansson, Sven-Ove. 2001. The Structure of Values and Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
12. Jeffrey, Richard C. 1983. The Logic of Decision, 2nd ed, Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press
13. Jeffrey, Richard C. 1992. Probability and the Art of Judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
14. Liu, Fenrong. 2008 Changing for the Better: Preference Dynamics and Agent Diversity. Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation
15. Pettit, Philip. 2002. Decision Theory and Folk Psychology. In Rules, Reasons, and Norms: Selected Essays, ed. Philip Pettit, 192–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press
16. Pollak, Robert A. 1976. Interdependent Preferences. The American Economic Review 66: 309–320
17. Skyrms, Brian. 1990. The Dynamics of Rational Deliberation. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press
18. Stigler, G. J. and Gary S. Becker. 1977. De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. The American Economic Review 67: 76–90
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bradley, R. (2009). Preference Kinematics. In: Grüne-Yanoff, T., Hansson, S.O. (eds) Preference Change. Theory and Decision Library, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2592-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2593-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)