Water Uptake and Water Supply

  • Cees Sonneveld
  • Wim Voogt


The water uptake and the water supply do not directly affect the mineral absorption of plants. However, many connections exist between the management of minerals and water. The most evident of those connections are following


Water Supply Water Uptake Irrigation Water Irrigation System Drainage Water 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Assinck F B T and Heinen M 2001. Modelverkenning naar het effect van niet-uniform verdeelde watergiften op de opname van chrysanten onder glas. Alterra Instituut Wageningen, Report 393, 36pp.Google Scholar
  2. Baas R Nijssen H M C Van den Berg T J M and Warmenhoven M G 1995. Yield and quality of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L) and gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii L) in a closed nutrient system as affected by sodium chloride. Sci. Hort. 61, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baas R and Van Rijssel E 2006. Transpiration of glasshouse rose crops: Evaluation of regression models. Acta Hort. 718, 547–554.Google Scholar
  4. Balendonck J Bruins M A Wattima M R Voogt W and Huys A 2005. WET-sensor pore water EC calibration for three horticultural soils. Acta Hort. 691, 789–796.Google Scholar
  5. De Bes S S 1986. Tussentijds overzicht “Verstoppende materialen druppelsystemen”. Internal report, 1986, 4pp.Google Scholar
  6. De Graaf R and Van den Ende J 1981. Transpiration and evapotranspiration of the glasshouse crops. Acta Hort. 119, 147–158.Google Scholar
  7. De Graaf R 1988. Automation of the water supplied of glasshouse crops by means of calculating the transpiration and measuring the amount of drainage water. Acta Hort. 229, 219–231.Google Scholar
  8. De Graaf R 1993. Verdamping en watervoorziening. Proefstation voor Tuinbouw onder Glas, Plantevoeding in de Glastuinbouw, Informatiereeks 87, 210–223.Google Scholar
  9. De Graaf R 1995. Influence of moisture deficit leaf-air and cultural practices on transpiration of glasshouse roses. Acta Hort. 401, 545–552.Google Scholar
  10. De Graaf R and Esmeijer M H 1998. Comparing calculated and measured water consumption in a study of the (minimal) transpiration of cucumbers grown on rockwool. Acta Hort. 458, 103–111.Google Scholar
  11. De Graaf R and Spaans L 1998. Watergeven bij roos onder glas. Proefstation voor Bloemisterij en Glasgroente Naaldwijk, Intern Verslag 171, 14pp.Google Scholar
  12. De Graaf R Roos M and Blok C 2004. De waterhuishouding bij belichte komkommers. Praktijkonderzoek Plant en Omgeving Naaldwijk, Rapport (June 2004), 36pp.Google Scholar
  13. De Kreij C and Van den Berg Th J M 1990. Nutrient uptake, production and quality of Rosa hybrida in rockwool as affected by electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution. In: M L van Beusichem (ed). Plant Nutrition – Physiology and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 519–523.Google Scholar
  14. De Kreij C and Van der Burg A M M 1998. Effect van Natrium chloride en EC op productie en kwaliteit van iris. Proefstation voor Bloemisterij en Glasgroente Naaldwijk, Rapport 158, 24pp.Google Scholar
  15. De Kreij C Van der Burg A M M and Runia W T 2003. Drip irrigation clogging in Dutch greenhouses are affected by Methane and organic acids. Agric. Water Manag. 60, 73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elings A and Voogt W 2008. Performance of the Intkan model for greenhouse crop transpiration. Acta Hort. 801, 1221–1228.Google Scholar
  17. Graves C J 1983. The nutrient film technique. Hort. Rev. 5, 1–44.Google Scholar
  18. Heemskerk M J Van Os E A Ruijs M N A and Schotman R W 1997. Verbeteren van watergeefsystemen voor grondgebonden teelten. Proefstation voor Bloemisterij en Glasgroente Naaldwijk, Rapport 84, Deelrapport 1: Inventarisatie en verbetering regenleidingsystemen, 61pp.Google Scholar
  19. Heinen M 1997. Dynamics of water and nutrients in closed, recirculating cropping systems in greenhouse horticulture. Proefschrift Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, 270 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Hilhorst M A 2000. A pore water conductivity sensor. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. J. 64, 1922–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houter B 1996. Constanten voor verdampingsprogramma. Priva De Lier The Netherlands. Internal communicatie data sheet, 1 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Lagerwerff J V and Eagle H E 1962. Transpiration related to ion uptake by beans from saline substrates. Soil Sci. 93, 420–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maloupa E M 2002. Hydroponic systems. In: Savvas D and Passam H (ed) Hydroponic Production of Vegetables and Ornamentals. Embryo Publications, Athens, 143–178.Google Scholar
  24. Marcelis L F M 1987. Simulatie van de waterhuishouding en de fotosynthese van kasgewassen. Doctoraalonderzoek Theoretische Teeltkunde. Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, 124pp.Google Scholar
  25. Nederhof E M 1994. Effects of CO2concentration on photosynthesis, transpiration and production of greenhouse vegetable crops. Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, Thesis213pp.Google Scholar
  26. Satti S M E Al-Yhyai R A and Al-Said F 1996. Fruit quality and partioning of mineral elements in processing tomato in response to saline nutrients. J. Plant Nutr. 19, 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Savvas D and Lenz F 1995. Närhstoffaufnahme von Aubergine (Solanum melongena L.) in Hydrocultur. Gartenbauwissenschaft 60(1), 29–33.Google Scholar
  28. Savvas D Pappa V A Kotsiras A and Gizas G 2005a. NaCl accumulation in a cucumber crop grown in a completely closed hydroponic system as influenced by NaCl concentration in irrigation water. Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 70, 217–223.Google Scholar
  29. Savvas D Pappa V A Gizas G and Maglaras L 2005b. Influence of NaCl concentration in the irrigation water on salt accumulation in the root zone and yield in a cucumber crop grown in a closed hydroponic system Acta Hort. 697, 93–99.Google Scholar
  30. Sonneveld C 1969. Het verloop van grondanalysecijfers (1965–1966): Onderzoek op basis van het verzadigingsextract. Proefstation voor de Groenten- en Fruitteelt onder Glas Naaldwijk. Intern Rapport, 6pp.Google Scholar
  31. Sonneveld C 1988. The salt tolerance of Alstoemeria (Alstroemeria, X). Acta Hort. 228, 317–326.Google Scholar
  32. Sonneveld C 1993a. Watervoorziening en waterkwaliteit bij teelten onder glas. In: Van Keulen H and Penning de Vries F T W (eds), Agrobiologische Thema’s 8, 41–48. CABO-DLO Wageningen.Google Scholar
  33. Sonneveld C 1993b. Mineralenbalansen bij kasteelten. Meststoffen, NMI Wageningen, 44–49.Google Scholar
  34. Sonneveld C 1995. Fertigation in the greenhouse industry. In: Proc. of the Dahlia Greidinger Intern. Symposium on Fertigation. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 25 March–1 April 1995, 121–140.Google Scholar
  35. Sonneveld C and Van den Bos A L 1995. Effects of nutrient levels on growth and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) grown on different substrates. J. Plant Nutr. 18, 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sonneveld C 2000. Effects of salinity on substrate grown vegetables and ornamentals in greenhouse horticulture. Thesis Wageningen University, Netherlands, 151pp.Google Scholar
  37. Stanghellini C 1987. Transpiration of greenhouse crops – an aid to climate management. Wageningen University, Thesis, 150pp.Google Scholar
  38. Ten Cate H R 1978. Ontijzeren van gietwater. In: Proefstation voor de Groente- en Fruitteelt onder Glas te Naaldwijk, Waterkwaliteit en Waterbehandeling voor de Glastuinbouw, Series: Informatiereeks no 50, 12–14.Google Scholar
  39. Van den Bos A De Kreij C and Voogt W 1999. Bemestingsadviesbasis grond. Proefstation Bloemisterij en Glasgroente Naaldwijk. Brochure PPO. 171, 54 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Van den Ende J 1970. Kwaliteitsnormen voor het gietwater. Bedrijfsontwikkeling1 nr 7, 45–51.Google Scholar
  41. Van den Ende J and De Graaf R 1974. Comparison of methods of water supply to hothouse tomatoes. Acta Hort. 35, 61–70.Google Scholar
  42. Van der Burg A M M and Hamaker Ph, 1987. Variatie in waterafgifte druppelaars en wateropname. Groenten en Fruit 42 no 19, 30–33.Google Scholar
  43. Van der Burg A M M and Sonneveld C 1987. Variation of the EC values in rockwool slabs. Glasshouse Crops Research Station Naaldwijk, Annual Report, 20.Google Scholar
  44. Van der Burg A 1994. Watergift beter afstemmen op waterverbruik. Groenten en Fruit/Glas-groenten 4 no 47, 25.Google Scholar
  45. Van Ieperen W 1996. Consequences of diurnal variation in salinity on water relations and yield of tomato. Thesis: Wageningen Agric. Univ., 176 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Van Noordwijk M and Raats P A C 1980. Drip and drainage systems for rockwoll culture in relation to accumulation and leaching of salts. Proc. Fifth Intern. Congr. Soilless Culture, Wageningen, 279–287.Google Scholar
  47. Van Schie J J Voogt W Sonneveld C and Beekmans G 1982. Voorlopige resultaten druppelbevloeiingsonderzoek. Vakblad Bloemisterij 37 no 30, 32–33.Google Scholar
  48. Voogt W Kipp J A De Graaf R and Spaans L 2000. A fertigation model for glasshouse crops grown in soil. Acta Hort. 537, 495–502.Google Scholar
  49. Voogt W and Sonneveld C 2004. Interactions between nitrate (NO3) and chloride (Cl) in nutrient solutions for substrate grown tomato. Acta Hort. 644, 359–368.Google Scholar
  50. Voogt W and Van Winkel A 2005. Onderzoek naar verdamping van alstroemeria. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
  51. Voogt W and Balendonck J 2006. Ideale meter voor bodemvocht bestaat nog niet. Vakblad Bloemisterij 61 no 5, 42–43.Google Scholar
  52. Voogt W Van Winkel A and Steinbuch F 2006a. Evaluation of the “fertigation model”, a decision support system for water and nutrient supply for soil grown greenhouse crops. Acta Hort. 718, 531–538.Google Scholar
  53. Voogt W and Van Winkel A 2008. De voedingsopname van cymbidium tijdens het jaar. Wageningen University Research, Report July 2008, 23pp.Google Scholar
  54. Voogt W and Van Winkel A 2009. Vocht en verdeling van nutrienten in de bodem onder invloed van de watergift en mulching in biologische teelt. Wageningen UR Greenhouse Horticulture, Report, 40pp.Google Scholar
  55. Voogt W Van Winkel A and Warmenhoven M 2006b. Resultaten van weeggoten hydrion III. Wageningen UR Greenhouse Horticulture, Internal Report, 65pp.Google Scholar
  56. Yaron B Ziesling N and Halevy A H 1969. Response of Baccara roses to saline irrigation. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94, 481–484.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cees Sonneveld
    • 1
  • Wim Voogt
    • 2
  1. 1.NijkerkNetherlands
  2. 2.Wageningen UR Greenhouse HorticultureBleiswijkNetherlands

Personalised recommendations