Skip to main content

Cultural Diversity and its Recognition in Public Universities: Fairness, Utility and Inclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Values Education

Part of the book series: Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research ((GCEP,volume 7))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The argument of this chapter was presented at the Australian national conference on “Access, Inclusion and Success: Muslim Students at Australian Universities,” Sydney, 2–4 September, 2007. I thank Dr. Sev Ozdowski for the invitation to present at the conference and the occasion to reflect on these issues.

  2. 2.

    In early 2007, the then Howard government expunged the word “multiculturalism” from (federal) government use in favour of “integration” and “citizenship,” a change that has been retained by the Rudd Labor government. However, there is little to indicate that the guiding principles of Australian multicultural policy have been abandoned. For an analysis of Australian multiculturalism, see Levey (2008a).

  3. 3.

    For present purposes, I am treating fairness, equality, equity, and justice as a family of principles representing the same basic approach to defending cultural accommodation. For other purposes, these concepts may be distinguished from each other. For a recent example, see Espinoza (2007).

  4. 4.

    The Disability Standards for Education 2005 were formulated under 31 (1) (b) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) by the Attorney-General Philip Ruddock on 17 March 2005.

  5. 5.

    See: http://www.studentlife.utoronto.ca/programs/multifaith.htm

References

  • Bader, V. (2007). Democracy or secularism? Associational governance of religious diversity. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batorowicz, K. (1999). Implementing multicultural policy in a university: Towards further way into equal opportunity in higher education. Paper presented to the Equal Opportunity Practitioners in Higher Education conference, the University of Auckland, New Zealand, 30 November–3 December: www.adcet.edu.au/uploads/documents/implementingmultipol.pd

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (1999). A new agenda for multicultural Australia. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, D. (1991). Illiberal education: The politics of race and sex on campus. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danley, J. R. (1991). Liberalism, aboriginal rights, and cultural minorities. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 20, 168–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, M. (1999). Pulse of a nation: A portrait of Australia. Harper Collins: Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, O. (2007). Solving the equity/equality conceptual dilemma: A new goal oriented model to approach analyses associated with different stages of the educational process. Educational Practice and Theory, 29(1), 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2002). Recognition without ethics. In S. Lash & M. Featherstone (Eds.), Recognition and difference: Politics, identity, multiculture (pp. 21–42). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, E. R. (2001). Becoming free: Autonomy and diversity in the liberal polity. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, N. (1997). We are all multiculturalists now. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. (2006). Liberal multiculturalism: Protective and polyglot. Political Theory, 34(3), 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2002). Recognition or redistribution? Changing perspectives on the moral order of society. In S. Lash & M. Featherstone (Eds.), Recognition and difference: Politics, identity, multiculture (pp. 43–55). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (1999). Human rights, group rights, and peoples’ rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 21(1), 80–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, community, and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levey, G. B. (1997). Equality, autonomy, and cultural rights. Political Theory, 25(2), 215–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levey, G. B. (2006). Symbolic recognition, multicultural citizens, and acknowledgement: Negotiating the christmas wars. Australian Journal of Political Science, 40, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levey, G. B. (2008). Multicultural political thought in Australian perspective. In G. B. Levey (Ed.), Political theory and Australian multiculturalism. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levey, G. B. (2009). Secularism and religion in a multicultural age. In G. B. Levey & T. Modood (Eds.), Secularism, religion, and multicultural citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. T. (2000). The multiculturalism of fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2007). Multiculturalism: A civic idea. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1998). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Multicultural Affairs (OMA). (1989). National agenda for a multicultural Australia. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Basingstoke, U.K.: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, Y. (1993). Liberal nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25–73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Brahm Levey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levey, G.B. (2009). Cultural Diversity and its Recognition in Public Universities: Fairness, Utility and Inclusion. In: Zajda, J., Daun, H. (eds) Global Values Education. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2510-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics