Abstract
Drought indicators quantify information thereby making the significance of such information more readily apparent; simplify information about complex phenomena in order to improve communication and portray the relative and/or absolute change over the period of time in quantifying flow-on economic impacts from potential changes in agricultural production and ways of dealing with the situations such as groundwater abstraction, irrigation scheduling, and social costs. As the drought risk is not only due to meteorological but also due to socio-economic and technological changes, the ideal index should be derived from a biophysical model having strong linkages to social and economic outcomes. The main purpose of the drought index was to compare the present-day risk with that of the anticipated risk in 50 years’ time assuming that there will be 30% more droughts then than now. It is important to establish benchmarks or trigger points for making critical decisions and also be important to have an indication of recovery time — the amount of rainfall required to bring the drought to an end.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gibbs, W.J. and Maher, (1967). Rainfall deciles as drought indicators. Bureau of Meteorology Bulletin, 48, Commonwealth of Australia, Australia.
James, EJ. (1999). Evapotranspiration losses with studies from Kerala. Proceedings International workshop on Water Surfaces. CSIP Publication no. 205, pp. 201–206.
Krishnan, A. (1979). Definition of droughts and factors affecting relevant to specifications of agricultural and hydrologic droughts. Proceedings International Symposium on Hydrological aspects of drought, 3–7 December 1979, New Delhi. pp. 67–102.
Lemon, E.R. and Sinn, J.H. (1968). Photosynthesis under field condition, Soil-Plant-Water relations during drought stress in com. Agronomy Journal, 60, pp. 337–343.
McKee, B., Doesken, N.J. and Kleist, N. (1993). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Proceeding 8th Applied Meterology, 17–22 Jan, Anaheim, CA, pp. 179–184.
Narasimhan, B. and Srinivasan, R. (2005). Development and evaluation of Soil Moisture Deficit Index (SMDI) and Evapotranspiration Deficit Index (ETDI) for agriculture drought monitoring. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 133, pp. 69–88.
Palmer, W.C. (1964). Meteorological drought. Usther Bureau, Department of Commerce Research paper 45, Washington DC.
Parthsarathy, B., Sontakke, N.A., Monot, A.A. and Kothawale, D.R. (1987). Drought/ floods in the summer monsoon season over different meteorological subdivisions of India for the period 1871–1984. J. Climatology, 7, pp. 57–70.
Petrasovits, I. (1990). General review on Drought strategies. In: Transactions of 14th Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, Rio De Janiero, Vol. 1-F International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID) G 43.1–43.27.
Rathore, L.S. and Biswas, B.C. (1999). Pan evaporation over India. Proceedings International workshop on Water Surfaces. CBIP Publication no. 205, pp. 61–68.
Salvati, L., Liberià, A. and Antonio Brunetti, A. (2005). Bio-climatic Evaluation of Drought Severity: A Computational Approach using Dry Spells. Journal Ecology and Biology.
Sastri, A.S.R.A.S., Ramakrishna, Y.S. and Ramana Rao, B.V. (1981). A new method of classifying agricultural drought. Archiv fur Meterologies Geophysik: und Bioklimatologie, ser B.29, pp. 283–287.
Steinemann, A., Hayes, M.J. and Cavalcanti, L. (2005). Drought Indicators and Triggers. In: Wilhite, D. (ed.) Drought and Wilter Crises: Science, Technology, and Management Issues. Marcel Dekker, NY.
Thornwaite, C.W. and Mather, J.R. (1957). Instruction and table for computing potential evapo-transpiration and the water balance. Climatology, 10(3).
Tucker, C.J. and Sellers, P.J. (1986). Satellite remote sensing of primary production. International J. Remote Sensing, 7, pp. 1395–1416.
Further Reading
Akinremi, O.O., McGinn, S.M. and Barr, A.G. (1996). Simulating soil moisture and other components of the hydrological cycle using a water budget approach. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 75, pp. 133–142.
Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M. and Nanni, T. (2001). Changes in total precipitation, rainy days and extreme events in northeastern Italy. International Journal of Climatology, 21, pp. 861–871.
Brunetti, M., Maugeri, M., Nanni, T. and Navarra, A. (2002). Droughts and extreme events in regional daily Italian precipitation series. Int. J. Climatol. 22, pp. 543–558.
Loaiciga, H.A. and Leipnik (1996). Stochastic renewal model of low-flow stream flow sequences. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 10(1), pp. 65–85.
Lohani, V.K. and Loganathan, G.V. (1997). An early warning system for drought management using the Palmer Drought Severity Index. Nordic Hydrology, 29(1), pp. 21–40.
Maracchi, G. (2000). Agricultural drought — A practical approach to definition, assessment and mitigation strategies. In: Vogt, J.V. and Somma, F. (eds). Drought and Drought Mitigation in Europe. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 63–75.
Sullivan, C.A. and Meigh, J.R. (2005). Targeting attention on local vulnerabilities using an integrated index approach: The example of the Climate Vulnerability Index. Water Sciences and Technology (Special Issue on Climate Change), 51(5), pp. 69–78.
Tate, E.L. and Gustard, A. (2000). Drought definition: Hydrological perspective. In: Vogt. J.V. and Somma, F. (eds) Drought and Drought Mitigation in Europe. Kluwar Academic Publishers, pp. 23–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Capital Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nagarajan, R. (2009). Drought Indices. In: Drought Assessment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2500-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2500-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2499-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2500-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)