Within Gender studies in particular and in many other academic disciplines in general, the simplistic dichotomy between men and women has been long refuted. In the real world, however, boys are still brought up to be men and girls to be women with the corresponding role expectations. Even in the more enlightened circles, women’s role and place is, if not determined, definitely informed by the fact that they could be, or could become, mothers. A news item in the biggest broad sheet newspaper in Finland celebrating the International Women’s day on 8 March 2008 included interviews with teenage girls. One of the interviewees told the journalist that she liked being a girl because that allowed her to dress up and that she waited to be a mother because only that will transform her from a girl to a woman [1]. I found that very alarming. If teenagers of our time living in European capital cities think that they need to become mothers to become women, not much has changed in the last hundred years. Women do not need to blame only men for the hardships they face, as they (I refuse to write “we”) are confining themselves to specified roles.
Keywords
- Human Reproduction
- Teenage Girl
- Female Genitalia
- Abort Foetus
- Simplistic Dichotomy
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Helsingin Sanomat. 8 March 2008. Page C12.
Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The Dialectic Sex: A Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Shanner, Laura and Nisker, Jeffrey. 2001. Bioethics for clinicians: 26. Assisted reproductive technologies. Canadian Medical Association Journal 164: 1589–1594.
Pence, Gregory. 2006. What is so good about natural motherhood? (In praise of unnatural gestation) In Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 77–88. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Tong, Rosemary. 2006. Out of body gestation: In whose best interests? In Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 59–76. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Simonstein, Frida. 2006. Artificial reproduction technologies (RTs)– all the way to the artificial womb? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9: 359–365.
Aristarkhova, Irina. 2005. Ectogenesis and mother as machine. Body & Society 11: 43–59.
Sander-Staudt, Maureen. 2006. Of machine born? A feminist assessment of ectogenesis and artificial wombs. In :Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 109–128. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Singer, Peter and Deanne Walls. 2006. (orig. 1985). Ectogenesis. In Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 9–25. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
James, David N. 1987. Ectogenesis: A reply to Singer and Wells. Bioethics 1: 80–99.
Cannold, Leslie. 1995. Women, ectogenesis and ethical theory. Journal of Applied Philosophy 12: 55–64.
Wells, Deane. 1987. Ectogenesis, justice and utility: A reply to James. Bioethics 1: 372–379.
Gelfand, Scott. 2006. Introduction. In Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 1–7. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Häyry, Matti. 2004. A rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 377–378.
Benatar, David. 1997. Why it is better never to come into existence. American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 345–355.
Childless by Choice. http://northvalley.net/cbc/
The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement. http://www.vhemt.org/
Smajdor, Anna. 2007. The moral imperative for ectogenesis. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16: 336–345.
Blackless, Melanie. et al. 2000. How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology 12: 151–166.
Bennett, Rebecca. 2008. Is reproduction women’s business? How should we regulate regarding stored embryos, posthumous pregnancy, ectogenesis and male pregnancy? Studies in Ethics, Law and Technology 2(3): article 3.
Murphy, Julien, S. 1989. Is pregnancy necessary: Feminist concerns about ectogenesis. Hypatia 4: 66–84.
Cannold, Leslie. 1995. Women, ectogenesis and ethical theory. Journal of Applied Philosophy 12: 55–64.
For further discussion on terminations and ectogenesis, see Iain Brassington, Chapter 15, Section “Terminations and Glass Wombs” in this book.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Takala, T. (2009). Human Before Sex? Ectogenesis as a Way to Equality. In: Simonstein, F. (eds) Reprogen-ethics and the future of gender. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2475-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2475-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2474-9
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2475-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)