Skip to main content

Is Transferred Parental Responsibility Legitimately Enforceable?

  • Chapter
Reprogen-ethics and the future of gender

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 43))

Two questions precede any considerations of reproductive genetics and gender. They are “Should people have children to begin with?” and “Who is responsible for children and why?” If it is irrational or immoral to produce offspring, as I have suggested elsewhere [1–3], reproductive genetics turns out to be a waste of time and gendered family roles obsolete. Tom Buller examines critically my views on this in Chapter 11. If, again, some people are more responsible for children than others, this should be made visible in the allocation of child-related burdens in society. In what follows, I offer some general comments regarding this second question for further discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Häyry, Matti. 2004. A rational cure for pre-reproductive stress syndrome. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 377–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Häyry, Matti. 2005. The rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome revisited. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 606–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Häyry, Matti. 2009. An analysis of some arguments for and against human reproduction. In Arguments and Analysis in Bioethics, Matti Häyry, Tuija Takala, Peter Herissone-Kelly, and Gardar Árnason (eds.) pp. 167–175. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aquinas, Thomas. 1988. (orig. 1265–1272). On Law, Morality and Politics, W. P. Baumgarth and R. J. Regan (eds.) pp. 47–48. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kant, Immanuel. 1887. (orig. 1796). The Philosophy of Law: An Exposition of the Fundamental Principles of Jurisprudence as the Science of Right. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark. Trans. by W. Hastie. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php&%3Ftitle=359&chapter=55777&layout=html&Itemid=27. Accessed 5 February 2008.

  6. Kant, Immanuel. 1994. (orig. 1797). The Metaphysical Principles of Virtue. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company. In Immanuel Kant, Ethical Philosophy (second edition), 97. Trans. by James W. Ellington.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Häyry, Matti. 1994. Liberal Utilitarianism and Applied Ethics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Häyry, Matti. 2007. Utilitarianism and bioethics. In Principles of Health Care Ethics (second edition), Richard Ashcroft, Angus Dawson, Heather Draper, and John McMillan (eds.) pp. 57–64. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rawls, John. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shiffrin, Seana Valentine. 1999. Wrongful life, procreative responsibility, and the significance of harm. Legal Theory 5: 117–148.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mill, John Stuart. 1869. (orig. 1859). On Liberty (fourth edition). London: Longman, Roberts & Green. http://www.bartleby.com/130/5.html. Accessed 6 February 2008.

  12. Declaration of the Rights of the Child. 1959. Proclaimed by United Nations General Assembly resolution 1386 (XIV), 20 November.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by United Nations General Assembly resolution 44/25, 20 November.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vehmas, Simo. 2002. Is it wrong to deliberately conceive or give birth to a child with mental retardation? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27: 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Purdy, Laura. 1995. Loving future people. In Reproduction, Ethics and the Law, J. Callahan (ed.) pp. 300–327. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman, Michael. 1997. The Moral Status of Children: Essays on the Rights of Children. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Herissone-Kelly, Peter. 2006. Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 166–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Savulescu Julian. 2001. Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15: 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Häyry, Matti. 2004. If you must make babies, then at least make the best babies you can? Human Fertility 7: 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matti Häyry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Häyry, M. (2009). Is Transferred Parental Responsibility Legitimately Enforceable?. In: Simonstein, F. (eds) Reprogen-ethics and the future of gender. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2475-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2475-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2474-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2475-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics