Advertisement

Gender Aesthetics

  • Gayle Salamon
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 59)

Abstract

The relationship between aesthetics and politics has long had a contested history, and this contestation continues in contemporary receptions of aesthetic theory. Within feminism, debates about the nature and use of aesthetics often engage this larger framework, in which aesthetics and politics are often considered mutually antagonistic. Feminism has both extended and contested this portrayal of aesthetics. In The Ethics of Ambiguity, simone de beauvoir criticizes the aesthetic attitude as one of “detached contemplation,” and understands aesthetics to be “a position of withdrawal, a way of fleeing the truth of the present” (1948: 75–76).

Keywords

Artistic Practice Aesthetic Theory Haptic Object Gender Subject Haptic Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Ahmed, Sara and Jackie Stacey, eds. Thinking Through the Skin. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, Judith. “Women, Representation, and Performance Art: Northern California.” In Performance Anthology: Source Book for a Decade of California Performance Art. Ed. Carl E. Loeffler and Darlene Tong. San Francisco: Last Gasp/Contemporary Performance Arts Press, 1980, 439–463.Google Scholar
  3. Battersby, Christine. Gender and Genius: Towards a Feminist Aesthetics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. Beauvoir, Simone. Pour une morale de l’ambiguïté. Paris: Gallimard, 1947; The Ethics of Ambiguity. Trans. Bernard Frechtman. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press, 1948.Google Scholar
  5. Bovenschen, Silvia. “Is There a Feminine Aesthetic?” Trans. Beth Weckmueller. In Feminist Aesthetics. Ed. Gisela Ecker. Boston: Beacon Press, 1985, 23–50.Google Scholar
  6. Broude, Norma, and Mary D. Garrard, eds. Feminism and Art History: Questioning the Litany. New York: Icon Editions, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. Broude, Norma, and Mary D. Garrard, eds. The Expanding Discourse: Feminism and Art History. New York: Icon Editions, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, Judith. “Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory.” In Performing Feminisms. Ed. Sue-Ellen Case. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990a, 270–282.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1990b.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, Judith. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. Caputi, Mary. Voluptuous Yearnings: A Feminist Theory of the Obscene. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Cromwell, Jason. Transmen and FTMs: Identities, Bodies, Genders, and Sexualities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Felski, Rita. Beyond Feminist Aesthetics: Feminist Literature and Social Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  15. Ferguson, Frances. Solitude and the Sublime: Romanticism and the Aesthetics of Individuation. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, Barbara Claire. The Feminine Sublime. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. Grosz, Elizabeth. “Feminist Theory and the Politics of Art.” In Dissonance: Feminism and the Arts 1970–1990. Ed. Catriona Moore. St. Leonards: Artspace/Allen and Unwin, 1994, 139–153.Google Scholar
  18. Heilbrun, Carolyn. Toward a Recognition of Androgyny. New York: Harper and Row, 1974.Google Scholar
  19. Hein, Hilde. “The Role of Feminist Aesthetics in Feminist Theory.” In Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48, 1990, 281–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hein, Hilde, and Carolyn Korsmeyer, eds. Aesthetics in Feminist Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. Ince, Kate. Orlan: Millennial Female. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Irigaray, Luce. Speculum of the Other Woman [1974]. Trans. Gillian C. Gill. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985a.Google Scholar
  23. Irigaray, Luce. Ce sexe qui n’en pas un. Paris: Gallimard, 1970; This Sex Which is Not One. Trans. Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985b.Google Scholar
  24. Isaak, Jo Anna. Feminism and Contemporary Art: The Revolutionary Power of Women’s Laughter. New York: Routledge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, Barbara. “Allegory’s Trip Tease: The White Water Lily.” In The Critical Difference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985, 13–20.Google Scholar
  26. Kelly, Mary. Postpartum Document. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. Korsmeyer, Carolyn. Gender and Aesthetics: An Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
  27. Lichtenberg-Ettinger, Bracha. “Woman as Objet a between phantasy and art.” In Complexity: Journal of Philosophy and Visual Arts 6, 1995, 56–77.Google Scholar
  28. Mayne, Judith. The Women at the Keyhole. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  29. McWhorter, Ladelle. Bodies and Pleasures: Foucault and the Politics of Sexual Normalization. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  30. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Sens et non-sens. Paris: Les Éditions Nagel, 1961; “Cézanne’s Doubt,” Sense and Non-Sense. Trans. Hubert Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  31. Mueller, Roswitha. Valie Export: Fragments of Imagination. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  32. Nochlin, Linda. “Why Have There Been no Great Women Artists?”In her Women, Art, and Power and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row, 1988, 147–158.Google Scholar
  33. Pollock, Griselda. Generations and Geographies in the Visual Arts: Feminist Readings. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
  34. Pollock, Griselda. Vision and Difference: Femininity, Feminism, and the Histories of Art. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
  35. Riviere, Joan. “Womanliness as Masquerade.” In The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 10, 1929.Google Scholar
  36. Rose, Jacqueline. Sexuality in the Field of Vision. London: Verso, 1986.Google Scholar
  37. Rubin, Henry. Self-Made Men: Identity and Embodiment Among Transsexual Men. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  38. Scarry, Elaine. On Beauty and Being Just. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  39. Seppä, Anita. “Foucault, Enlightenment and the Aesthetics of the Self.” In Contemporary Aesthetics 2, 2004.Google Scholar
  40. Silverman, Kaja. The Acoustic Mirror. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  41. Silverman, Kaja. Male Subjectivity at the Margins. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  42. Silverman, Kaja. The Threshold of the Visible World. New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
  43. Silverman, Kaja. World Spectators. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  44. Stone, Sandy. “The Empire Strikes Back: A Posttranssexual Manifesto.” In Camera Obscura 29, 1992, 151–176.Google Scholar
  45. Suleiman, Susan Rubin. Subversive Intent: Gender, Politics, and the Avant-Garde. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, Dianna and Karen Vintges, Feminism and the Final Foucault. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  47. Woolf, Virginia. A Room of One’s Own. London: Hogarth Press, 1929.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gayle Salamon
    • 1
  1. 1.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations