Skip to main content

The Rise and Development of Logical Semantics in Poland

  • Chapter
The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 16))

The aim of this paper is to portray the rise and development of logical (formal) semantics in Poland in the years that constitute the “golden age” of Polish logic and philosophy (see also Wolenski 2002). I use the adjective “Polish” purely geographically, that is, as equivalent to “in Poland”. This means that the phrase does not connote any national ingredients. My considerations are restricted to the period that extends from 1895 (when Kazimierz Twardowski came to Lvov as the professor of philosophy) until 1939 (the beginning of World War II), but I’ll make some comments about the situation after 1945. Technically speaking, there was no Poland between 1895–1918, but Polish philosophy nonetheless developed quite well during those years, and I will abstract from these peculiar political circumstance. Since the length of this paper is limited, my presentation focuses on certain issues and ignores others. In particular, I do not compare Polish philosophy with other contemporary traditions or schools in which logic and semantics flourished. I also assume that the ideas of the main Polish philosophers, especially those of Tarski, are sufficiently well known and do not require a detailed presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajdukiewicz, K. (1930), ‘Elementy teorii poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk T. Kotarbińskiego’ [Review of Kotarbiński 1929], Przegląd Filozoficzny 23/1–2, 140–160; Eng. trans. in Kotarbiński 1929, 514–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajdukiewicz, K. (1931), ‘O znaczeniu wyrażeń’ (On the Meaning of Expressions), in Księga Pamiątkowa Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoficznego we Lwowie (The Memorial Book of the Polish Philosophical Society in Lvov), Polskie Towarzystwo Filozoficzne, Lwów; Eng. trans. (by J. Giedymin) in Ajdukiewicz 1978, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajdukiewicz, K. (1936), ‘Die syntaktische Konnexität’, Studia Philosophica 1, 1–27; Eng. trans. (by H. Weber), in Ajdukiewicz 1978, 118–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajdukiewicz, K. (1978), The Scientific World-Perspective and Other Essays, 1930-1963, Dordrecht, D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajdukiewicz, K. (1993), ‘Kategorie syntaktyczne i antynomie logiczne. Wykłady z semantyki logicznej w r. a. 1930/1931’ (Syntactic Antinomies and Logical Antinomies. Lectures on Logical Semantics in the Academic Year 1930/1931), Filozofia Nauki 1/1, 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti, A (2004), ‘Leśniewski’s Early Liar, Tarski and Natural Language’, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 127, 267–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R. (1929), Abriss der Logisitik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Relationstheorie und ihrer Anwendungen, Julius Springer, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwistek L. (1935), Granice nauki. Zarys logiki i metodologii nauk ścisłych (The Limits of Science. Outline of Logic and Methodology of the Exact Sciences), Lvov, Książnica-Atlas; Eng. trans. (by E. Brodie and A. Coleman), London, Kegan Paul, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czeżowski, T. (1918), ‘Imiona i zdania. Dwa odczyty’ (Names and Sentences. Two Lectures), Przegląd Filozoficzny 21, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1929), Über die Vollständigkeit des Logikkalküls, Wien Universität, repr. with Eng. trans. (by S. Bauer-Mengelberg) in Gödel 1986, 60–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1930), ‘Die Vollständigkeit der Axiome des logischen Funktionenkalkül’, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 37, 349–360: repr. with Eng. trans. (by S. Bauer-Mengelberg) in Gödel 1986, 102–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1931), ‘Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I’, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38, 173–198; repr. with Eng. trans. in Gödel 1986, 145–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (1986), Collected Works Volume I, Publications 1929-1936, ed. S. Feferman et al., Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (2003), Collected Works Volume IV, Correspondence A-G, ed. by S. Feferman et al., Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K. (2003a), Collected Works Volume IV, Correspondence A-G, ed. by S. Feferman et al., Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D. and Ackermann, W., 1928, Grundzüge der theoretischen Logik, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1988), ‘On the Development of Model-Theoretic Viewpoint in Logical Theory’, Synthese 77, 1–36; repr. in Hintikka 1997, 104–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1997), Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator. An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy (J. Hintikka, Selected Papers 2), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1997), Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator. An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy (J. Hintikka, Selected Papers 2), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotarbiński, T. (1929), Elementy teorii poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk (Elements of Theory of Knowledge, Formal Logic and Methodology of Science), Lvov, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich; Eng. trans. (by O. Wojtasiewicz) as Gnosiology. The Scientific Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, Pergamon, Oxford, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M. (1989), Language as Calculus vs. Language as Universal Medium. A Study in Husserl, Heidegger and Gadamer, Dordrecht, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leśniewski S. (1913), ‘Krytyka zasady wyłączonego środka’ (The Critique of the Logical Principle of Excluded Middle), Przegląd Filozoficzny 16, 315–352; Eng. trans. in Leśniewski 1992, 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leśniewski, S. (1929), ‘Grundzüge eines neuen Systems der Grundlagen der Mathematik’, Fundamenta Mathematicae 14, 1–81; Eng. trans. in Leśniewski 1992, 410–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leśniewski, S. (1992), Collected Works, ed. and trans. by S. J. Surma, J. Strzednicki, and D. I. Barnett, Dordrecht, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łukasiewicz J. (1915), ‘O nauce’ (On Science), in Poradnik dla Samouków (A Guide for Auto-Didacts) vol. 1, by S. Michalski (ed.), Warsaw, Heflich i Michalski, xv–xxxix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łukasiewicz J. (1920), ‘Logika dwuwartościowa’ (Two-Valued Logic), Przegląd Filozoficzny 23, 189–205; Eng. tr. (by O. Wojtasiewicz) in Łukasiewicz 1970, 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łukasiewicz, J. (1970), Selected Works, L. Borkowski (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedźwiedzka-Ossowska, M. (1925), ‘Semantyka prof. St. Szobera’ (Semantics of Prof. St. Szober), Przegląd Filozoficzny 28, 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossowski, S. 1926, ‘Analiza pojęcia znaku’ (An Analysis of the Concept of Sign), Przegląd Filozoficzny 29, 29–56); Eng. trans. (by O. Wojtasiewicz) in Semantics in Poland 1894–1969, J. Pelc (ed.), Dordrecht, D. Reidel, 1979, 164–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebel, M. (1996), Der Begriff der Ableitbarkeit bei Bolzano, Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierpiński, W. (1965), Cardinal and Ordinal Numbers, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szober, S. (1923), Gramatyka języka polskiego (Grammar of Polish Language), Lvov-Warsaw, Książnica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szober, S. (1924), Zarys językoznawstwa ogólnego (An Outline of General Linguistics), Warsaw, Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Języka Polskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1930–1931), ‘O pojęciu prawdy w odniesieniu do sformalizowanych teorii dedukcyjnych’ (On the Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages of Deductive Sciences), Ruch Filozoficzny 12, 210–211; repr. in Tarski 1986, vol. 4, 555–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1931), ‘Sur les ensembles définissables de nombres réels I’, Fundamenta Mathematica 17, 210–239; Eng. trans. (by J. H. Woodger) in Tarski 1983, 110–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1932), Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den Sprachen der deduktiven Disziplinen’, Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-naturwissenschafliche Klasse, Akademischer Anzeiger 69, 9–12; repr. in Tarski 1986, vol. 1, 613–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1933), Pojęcie prawdy w językach nauk dedukcyjnych (The Concept of Truth in Languages of Deductive Sciences), Warsaw, Towarzystwo Naukowe Warszawskie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1936), ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’, Studia Philosophica 1, 152–278; repr. in Tarski 1986, vol. 2, 51–198; Eng. trans. (by J. H. Woodger) in Tarski 1983, 152–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1936a), ‘Grundlegung der wissenschaftlichen Semantik’, Actes du Congrès International du Philosophie Scientifique, vol. 3, Hermann, Paris 1938, 1–8; Eng. trans. (by J. H. Woodger) in Tarski 1956, 401–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1939), ‘On Undecidable Sentences in Enlarged Systems of Logic and the Concept of Truth’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 4/3, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1944), ‘The Semantics Definition of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1954), ‘[Contribution to the Discussion of P. Bernays, Zur Beurteilung der Situation in der beweistheoretischen Forschung]’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 8, 16–20; repr. in Tarski 1986, vol. 4, 713–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1962), ‘Some Problems and Results Relevant to the Foundations of Set Theory’, in Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Stanford, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1983), Logic, Semantics, Mathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938, 2nd edition, J. Corcoran (ed.), Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1986), Collected Papers, vol. 1–4, S. R. Givant and R. N. McKenzie (eds.), Basel, Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski K. (1894), Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegestand der Vorstellungen, Hölder, Wien; Eng. trans. (by R. Grossmann), On Content and Object of Presentations, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski, K. (1912), ‘O czynnościach i wytworach. Kilka uwag z pogranicza psychologii, gramatyki i logiki’ (On Actions and Products. Some Remarks from the Boderline of Psychology, Grammar and Logic), in Księga Pamiątkowa ku uczczeniu 250 rocznicy założenia Uniwersytetu Lwowskiego przez króla Jana Kazimierza (The Memorial Book for Celebration the 250th Anniversary of Establishing the Lvov University by the King John Casimir II), Lvov, Uniwersytet Lwowski; Eng. trans. (by A. Szylewicz) in Twardowski 1999, 103–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski, K. (1999), On Actions, Products and Other Topics in Philosophy, J. Brandl and J. Woleński (eds), Amsterdam, Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (1997), ‘Husserl and the Development of Formal Semantics’, Philosophia Scientiae 1/4, 151–158; repr. in Woleński 1999a, 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (1999), ‘Semantic Revolution: Rudolf Carnap, Kurt Gödel, Alfred Tarski’, in Alfred Tarski and the Vienna Circle, J. Woleński and E. Köhler (eds.), Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (1999a), Essays in the History of Logic and Logical Philosophy, Jagiellonian University Press, Cracow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (2002), ‘From Intentionality to Formal Semantics’ (From Twardowski to Tarski), Erkenntnis 56(2002), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (2003), ‘Psychologism and Metalogic’, Synthese 137, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (2004), ‘The Reception of Frege in Poland’, History and Philosophy of Logic 25, 37–51; repr. in Gottlob Frege: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, vol. 1, M. Beaney and E. Reck (eds.), London, Routledge, 290–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woleński, J. (2005), ‘Gödel, Tarski and Truth’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59, 459–490.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woleński, J. (2009). The Rise and Development of Logical Semantics in Poland. In: Lapointe, S., Wolénski, J., Marion, M., Miskiewicz, W. (eds) The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2401-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics