Skip to main content

Expected Tail Loss Efficient Frontiers for CDOS of Bespoke Portfolios Under One-Factor Copula Marginal Distributions

  • Chapter
  • 2292 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 39))

The global structured credit landscape has been irrevocably changed with the innovation of Collateralized Debt Obligations (abbreviated as CDOs). As of 2006, the volume of synthetic CDO structures outstanding grew to over $1.9 trillion. Understanding the risk/return trade-off dynamics underlying the bespoke collateral portfolios is crucial when optimising the utility provided by these instruments. In this paper, we study the behaviour of the efficient frontier generated for a collateral portfolio under heavy-tailed distribution assumptions. The convex and coherent credit risk measures, ETL and Copula Marginal ETL (abbreviated as CMETL), are used as our portfolio optimisation criterion. iTraxx Europe IG S5 index constituents are used as an illustrative example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Beinstein, “A review of themes from 2006 and outlook for 2007,” JP Morgan, in Corporate Quantitative Research, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Finger, “Conditional approaches for credit metrics portfolio distributions,” Credit Metrics Monitor, 2(1), 1999, 14–33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Schonbucher, “Taken to the limit: Simple and not so simple loan loss distributions,” Working paper, Department of Statistics, Bonn University.

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. Vasicek, “Probability of loss on a loan portfolio,” Technical report, KMV Corporation, 1987, Available: www.moodys.com.

  5. J. P. Laurent, & J. Gregory, “Basket Default Swaps, CDO's and Factor Copulas,” Working paper, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Mausser, & D. Rosen, “Efficient risk/return frontiers for credit risk,” in Algo Research Quarterly, 2(4), 1999, 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. T. Rockafellar, & S. Uryasev, “Optimisation of conditional value-at-risk,” in Journal of Risk, 3, 2000, 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J. M. Eber, & D. Heath, “Coherent measures of risk,” in Mathematical Finance, 9, 1999, 203–28.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S. T. Rachev, R. D. Martin, B. Racheva, & S. Stoyanov, “Stable ETL optimal portfolios & extreme risk management,” FinAnalytica, 2006, Available: www.statistik.uni-karlsruhe.de/ download/Stable_Distributions_White_Paper.pdf

  10. M. Kalkbrener, H. Lotter, & L. Overbeck, “Sensible and efficient capital allocation for credit portfolios,” Deutsche Bank AG, 2003 Available: http://www.gloriamundi.org/detailpopup. asp?ID = 453057574

  11. A. Rajan, G. McDermotte, & R. Roy, The Structured Credit Handbook, Wiley Finance Series, New Jersey, 2006, pp. 153–155.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Tejwani, A. Yoganandan, & A. Jha, “How do dealers risk manage synthetic CDOs,” Lehman Brothers, in Structured Credit Research, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. P. Nolan, “Numerical Calculation of Stable densities and distribution functions,” in Communications in Statistics — Stochastic Models, 13, 1997, 759–774.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Mittnik, T. Doganoglu, & D. Chenyao, “Computing the probability density function of Stable Paretian distributions,” in Mathematical & Computer Modelling, 29, 1999, 235–240.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. O. Vasicek, “Probability of loss on a loan portfolio,” Technical report, KMV Corporation, 1987, Available: www.moodys.com

  16. F. R. Frey, A. McNiel, & M. Nyfeler, “Copulas and credit models,” in Risk, October, 2001, pp. 111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Follmer, & A. Schied, “Robust preferences and convex measures of risk,” In S. Klaus, P. J. Schonbucher, & D. Sondermann, editors, Advances in Finance and Stochastics, Springer, New York, pp. 39–56, 2002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Jewan, R. Guo, & G. Witten, “Copula marginal expected tail loss efficient frontiers for CDOs of bespoke portfolios,” in Proceedings of the World Congress in Financial Engineering Conference, 2, 1124–1129, London, July 1–7, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jewan, D., Guo, R., Witten, G. (2009). Expected Tail Loss Efficient Frontiers for CDOS of Bespoke Portfolios Under One-Factor Copula Marginal Distributions. In: Ao, SI., Gelman, L. (eds) Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computational Science. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2311-7_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2311-7_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2310-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2311-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics