Advertisement

Strategies for Effective Somatic Embryogenesis in Grapevine: An appraisal

  • L. Martinelli
  • I. Gribaudo

Following our previous review on the progress in somatic embryogenesis in the Vitis genus until the beginning of this millennium (Martinelli and Gribaudo 2001), the present review reports the state-of the-art of this morphogenic process stressing the milestones, the most recent advances and the main points of interest. With this chapter, the authors aim to offer an experienced background to researchers who intend to study grape morphogenesis and to scientists who want to achieve successfully somatic embryogenesis in this fruitcrop.

Keywords

Somatic Embryo Somatic Embryogenesis Embryogenic Callus Zygotic Embryo Embryogenic Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altamura MM, Cersosimo A, Majoli C, Crespan M (1992) Histological study of embryogenesis and organogenesis from anthers of Vitis rupestris du Lot cultured in vitro. Protoplasma 171:134-141Google Scholar
  2. Altamura MM, Cersosimo A, Majoli C, Crespan M, Capitani F (1993) Formation of secondary embryoids obtained from anthers of Vitis rupestris Scheele cultured in vitro Giorn Bot Ital 127:297-299Google Scholar
  3. Ammirato PV (1977) Hormonal control of somatic embryo development in cultured cells of caraway: interaction of abscisic acid, zeatin and gibberellic acid. Plant Physiol 59:579-586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ammirato PV (1983) Embryogenesis. In: Evans DA, Sharp WR, Ammirato PV, Yamada Y (eds), Handbook of Plant Cell Cultures, Techniques for Propagation and Breeding. Mcmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben Amar A, Cobanov P, Boonrod K, Krczal G, Bouzid S, Ghorbel AG, Reustle M (2007) Efficient procedure for grapevine embryogenic suspension establishment and plant regeneration: role of conditioned medium for cell proliferation. Plant Cell Rep 26:1439–1447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertsch C, Kieffer F, Maillot P, Farine S, Butterlin G, Merdinoglu D, Walter B (2005) Genetic chimerism of Vitis vinifera cv Chardonnay 96 is maintained through organogenesis but not somatic embryogenesis. BMC Plant Biol 5:20 (doi:101186/1471-2229-5-20)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertoldi D, Tassoni A, Martinelli L, Bagni N (2004) Polyamines and somatic embryogenesis in different Vitis vinifera L cultivars. Physiol Plant 120:657-666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bornhoff B-A, Harst M (2000) Establishment of embryo suspension cultures of grapevines (Vitis L). Vitis 39:27-29Google Scholar
  9. Bondaz J, Gambino G, Cuozzo D, Gribaudo I (2004) Risanamento di cloni di vite (Vitis vinifera L) da virus floematici mediante embriogenesi somatica. Petria 14:99-108Google Scholar
  10. Bouamama B, Ben Salem-Fnayou A, Ben Jouira H, Ghorbel A, Mliki A (2007) Influence of the flower stage and culture medium on the induction of somatic embryogenesis from anther culture in Tunisian grapevine cultivars. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 41(4):185-192Google Scholar
  11. Bouquet A (1989) Culture in vitro de la vigne Attention aux mauvaises surprises! Progr Agric Vitic 106:303-305Google Scholar
  12. Bouquet A, Piganeau B, Lamaison M (1982) Influence du génotype sur la production de cals, d’embryoides et de plantes entières par culture d’anthères in vitro dans le genre Vitis Compt Bornhoff B-A, Hars Rend Acad Sci Paris 295:569-574Google Scholar
  13. Cadavid-Labrada A, Medina C, Martinelli L, Arce-Johnson P (2008) Somatic embryogenesis and efficient regeneration of Vitis vinifera L cv Carménère plants. Vitis 47:73-74Google Scholar
  14. Cao Z (1990) Grape anther culture. In: Zenghua Chen et al (ed), Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Vol VI, Perennial Crops. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Carimi F, Barizza E, Gardiman M, Lo Schiavo F (2005) Somatic embryogenesis from stigmas and styles of grapevine. In vitro Cell Dev Biol 41(3):249-252Google Scholar
  16. Chugh A, Khurana P (2002) Gene expression during somatic embryogenesis – recent advances. Curr Sci 83:715-730Google Scholar
  17. Chatelet P, Laucou V, Fernandez L, Sreekantan L, Lacombe T, Martinez-Zapater JM, Thomas M, Torregrosa RL (2007) Characterization of Vitis vinifera L somatic variants exhibiting abnormal flower development patterns. J Exp Bot 58:4107-4118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Colova-Tsolova V, Perl A, Krastanova S, Tsvetkov I, Atanassov A (2001) Genetically engineered grape for disease and stress tolerance. In: KA Roubelakis-Angelakis (ed) Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of the Grapevine. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  19. Colova-Tsolova VM, Bordallo PN, Phills BR, Bausher M (2007) Synchronized somatic embryo development in embryogenic suspensions of grapevine Muscadinia rotundifolia (Michx) Small. Vitis 46:15-18Google Scholar
  20. Compton ME, Gray DJ (1996) Effects of sucrose and methylglyoxal bis-(guanylhydrazone) on controlling grape somatic embryogenesis. Vitis 35:1-6Google Scholar
  21. Coutos-Thevenot P, Goebel-Tourand I, Mauro MC, Jouanneau JP, Boulay M, Deloire A, Guern J (1992a) Somatic embryogenesis from grapevine cells I-Improvement of embryo development by changes in culture conditions. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 29:125-133Google Scholar
  22. Coutos-Thevenot P, Maes O, Jouenne T, Mauro MC, Boulay M, Deloire A, Guern J (1992b) Extracellular protein patterns of grapevine cell suspensions in embryogenic and nonembryogenic situations. Plant Sci 86:137-145Google Scholar
  23. Cutanda MC, Bouquet A, Chatelet P, Lopez G, Botella O, Montero FJ, Torregrosa L (2008) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Vitis vinifera cultivars ‘Macabeo’ and ‘Tempranillo’. Vitis 47:159-162Google Scholar
  24. Das DK, Reddy MK, Upadhyaya KC, Sopory SK (2002) An efficient leaf-disc culture method for the regeneration via somatic embryogenesis and transformation of grape (Vitis vinifera L). Plant Cell Rep 20:999-1005Google Scholar
  25. Das DK, Nirala NK, Reddy MK, Sopory SK, Upadhyaya KC (2006) Encapsulated somatic embryos of grape (Vitis vinifera L): an efficient way for storage and propagation of pathogenefree plant material. Vitis 45:179-184Google Scholar
  26. Desperrier JM, Berger JL, Bessis R, Fournioux JC, Labroche C (2003) Création clonale dirigée par embryogenèse somatique. Bull OIV 871-872:751-765Google Scholar
  27. de Vries SC (1998) Making embryos in plants. Trends Plant Sci 3:451-452Google Scholar
  28. Dodeman VL, Ducreux G, Kreis M (1997) Zygotic embryogenesis versus somatic embryogenesis. J Exp Bot 48:1493-1509Google Scholar
  29. Emershad RL, Ramming DW (1994) Somatic embryogenesis and plant development from immature zygotic embryos of seedless grapes (Vitis vinifera L). Plant Cell Rep 14:6-12Google Scholar
  30. Esensee V, Stushnoff C, Forsline P (1990) Cryopreservation of dormant grape (Vitis spp) buds. HortSci 25:90Google Scholar
  31. Faure O (1990) Embryons somatiques de Vitis rupestris et embryons zygotiques de Vitis sp: morphologie, histologie, histochimie et développement. Can J Bot 68:2305-2315Google Scholar
  32. Faure O, Aarrouf J (1994) Metabolism of reserve products during development of somatic embryos and germination of zygotic embryos in grapevine. Plant Sci 96:167-178Google Scholar
  33. Faure O, Nougarède A (1993) Nuclear DNA content of somatic and zygotic embryos of Vitis vinifera cv Grenache noir at the torpedo stage Flow cytometry and in situ DNA microspectrophotometry. Protoplasma 176:145-150Google Scholar
  34. Faure O, Aarrouf J, Nougarède A (1996a) Ontogenesis, differentiation and precocious germination in anther-derived somatic embryos of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L): proembryogenesis. Ann Bot 78:23-8Google Scholar
  35. Faure O, Aarrouf J, Nougarède A (1996b) Ontogenesis, differentiation and precocious germination in anther-derived somatic embryos of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L): embryonic organogenesis. Ann Bot 78:29-37Google Scholar
  36. Faure O, Dewitte W, Nougarède A, VanOnckelen H (1998) Precociously germinating somatic embryos of Vitis vinifera have lower ABA and IAA levels than their germinating zygotic counterparts. Physiol Plant 102:591-595Google Scholar
  37. Faure O, Mengoli M, Nougarède A, Bagni N (1991) Polyamine pattern and biosynthesis in zygotic and somatic embryo stages of Vitis vinifera. J Plant Physiol 138:545-549Google Scholar
  38. Favre JM (1977) Premiers résultats concernant l’obtenition in vitro de néoformations aulinaires chez la Vigne. Ann Am Plantes 27:151-169Google Scholar
  39. Finkelstein RR Crouch ML (1984) Precociously germinating rapeseed embryos retain characteristics of embryogeny. Planta 162:125-131Google Scholar
  40. Franks T, He DG, Thomas M (1998) Regeneration of transgenic Vitis vinifera L Sultana plants: genotypic and phenotypic analysis. Mol Breed 4:321-333Google Scholar
  41. Franks T, Botta RM, Thomas R (2002) Chimerism in grapevines: implications for cultivar identity, ancestry and genetic improvement. Theor Appl Genet 104:192-199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Gambino G, Bondaz J, Gribaudo I (2006) Detection and elimination of viruses in callus, somatic embryos and regenerated plantlets of grapevine. Eur J Plant Pathol 114:397-404Google Scholar
  43. Gambino G, Ruffa P, Vallania R, Gribaudo I (2007) Somatic embryogenesis from whole flowers, anthers and ovaries of grapevine (Vitis spp). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 90(1):79-83Google Scholar
  44. Gambino G, Di Matteo D, Gribaudo I (2009) Elimination of Grapevine fanleaf virus from three Vitis vinifera cultivars by somatic embryogenesis. Eur J Plant Pathol 123:57-60Google Scholar
  45. Gianazza E, De Ponti P, Scienza A, Villa P, Martinelli L (1992) Monitoring by two-dimensional electrophoresis somatic embryogenesis in leaf and petiole explants from Vitis. Electrophoresis 13:203-209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Goebel-Tourand I, Mauro MC, Sossountazov L, Miginiac E, Deloire A (1993) Arrest of somatic embryo development in grapevine: histological characterization and the effect of ABA, BAP and zeatin in stimulating plantlet development. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 33:91-103Google Scholar
  47. Goussard PG, Wiid J (1992) The elimination of fanleaf virus from grapevines using in vitro somatic embryogenesis combined with heat therapy. S Afr J Enol Vitic 13:81-83Google Scholar
  48. Goussard PG, Wiid J, Kasdorf GGF (1991) The effect of in vitro somatic embryogenesis in eliminating fanleaf virus and leafroll associated viruses from grapevines. S Afr J Enol Vitic 12:77-81Google Scholar
  49. Gray DJ (1987) Quiescence in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous somatic embryos induced by dehydration. HortSci 22:810-814Google Scholar
  50. Gray DJ (1989) Effects of dehydration and exogenous growth regulators on dormancy, quiescence and germination of grape somatic embryos. In vitro Cell Dev Biol 5:1173-1178Google Scholar
  51. Gray DJ (1992) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature zygotic embryos of muscadine grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia) cultivars. Am J Bot 79:542-546Google Scholar
  52. Gray DJ (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in grape. In: Jain S, Gupta P, Newton R (eds) Somatic embryogenesis in woody plants. Kluwer Acad Publ, NLGoogle Scholar
  53. Gray DJ, Compton ME (1993) Grape somatic embryo dormancy and quiescence: potential of dehydrated synthetic seeds for germplasm conservation. In: Redenbaugh K (ed), Synseeds: applications of synthetic seeds to crop improvement. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  54. Gray DJ, Meredith CP (1992) Grape. In: Hammerschlag FA, Litz RE (eds) Biotechnology of Perennial Fruit Crops. CAB Intern, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  55. Gray DJ, Mortensen JA (1987) Initiation and maintenance of long term somatic embryogenesis from anthers and ovaries of Vitis longii ‘Microsperma’. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 9:73-80Google Scholar
  56. Gray DJ, Jayasankar S, Litz RE (2002) Regeneration system for grape and uses thereof. USA Patent No 6,455,312 B1, Sept 24, 2002Google Scholar
  57. Gresshoff PM, Doy CH (1974) Derivation of a haploid cell line from Vitis vinifera and the importance of the stage of meiotic development of anthers for haploid culture of this and other genera. Z Pflanzenphysiol 73:123-141Google Scholar
  58. Gribaudo I, Gambino G, Vallania R (2004) Somatic embryogenesis from grapevine anthers: the optimal developmental stage for collecting explants. Am J Enol Vitic 55:427-430Google Scholar
  59. Gribaudo I, Gambino G, Cuozzo D, Mannini F (2006) Attempts to eliminate Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus from grapevine clones. J Plant Pathol 88:293-298Google Scholar
  60. Gribaudo I, Torello Marinoni D, Gambino G, Mannini F (2009) Assessment of genetic fidelity in somaclones of two Vitis vinifera cultivars. Acta Hortic (in press)Google Scholar
  61. Harst M (1995) Development of a regeneration protocol for high frequency somatic embryogenesis from explants of grapevines (Vitis spp). Vitis 34:27-29Google Scholar
  62. Hirabayashi T, Kozaki I, Akihama T (1976) In vivo differentiation of shoots from anther callus in Vitis grape research. HortSci 11:511-512Google Scholar
  63. Hocquigny S, Pelsy F, Dumas V, Kindt S, Heloir M-C, Merdinoglu D (2004) Diversification within grapevine cultivars goes through chimeric states. Genome 47:579-589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Jayasankar S, Gray DJ, Litz RE (1999) High-efficiency somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from suspension cultures of grapevine. Plant Cell Rep 18:533-537Google Scholar
  65. Jayasankar S, Li Z, Gray DJ (2000) In-vitro selection of Vitis vinifera ‘Chardonnay’ with Elsinoe ampelina culture filtrate is accompanied by fungal resistance and enhanced secretion of chitinase. Planta 211:200-208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Jayasankar S, Bondada BR, Li Z, Gray DJ (2002) A unique morphotype of grapevine somatic embryos exhibits accelerated germination and early plant development. Plant Cell Rep 20:907- 911Google Scholar
  67. Jayasankar S, Bondada B, Li Z, Gray DJ (2003) Comparative anatomy and morphology of Vitis vinifera (Vitaceae) somatic embryos form solid- and liquid-culture-derived proembryogenic masses. Am J Bot 90:973-979Google Scholar
  68. Jayasankar S, Van Aman M, Li Z, Gray DJ (2001) Direct seeding of grapevine somatic embryos and regeneration of plants. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 37:476-479Google Scholar
  69. Jayasankar S, Van Aman M, Codts J, Li Z, Gray DJ (2005) Low temperature storage of suspension culture-derived grapevine somatic embryos and regeneration of plants. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 41:752-756Google Scholar
  70. Jiménez VM, Bangerth F (2000) Relationship between endogenous hormone levels of grapevine callus cultures and their morphogenetic behaviour. Vitis 39:151-157Google Scholar
  71. Jittayasothorn Y, Lu J, Xu X, Thipyapong P, Boonkerd N (2007) A simple and highly efficient protocol for somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from proembryonic mass suspension culture in ‘Autumn Royal Seedless’. Vitis 46:45-46Google Scholar
  72. Kikkert JR, Thomas MR, Reisch BI (2001) Grapevine genetic engineering. In: Roubelakis- Angelakis KA (ed) Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of the Grapevine. Kluwer Acad Publ, NLGoogle Scholar
  73. Kikkert JR, Striem MJ, Vidal JR, Wallace P, Barnard, G, Reisch B (2005a) Long-term study of somatic embryogenesis from anthers and ovaries of 12 grapevine (Vitis sp) genotypes In vitro. Cell Dev Biol-Plant 41:232-239Google Scholar
  74. Kikkert JR, Vidal JR, Reisch BI (2005b) Stable transformation of plant cells by particle bombardment/biolistics. Methods Mol Biol 286:61-78Google Scholar
  75. Krul WR, Narragansett RI (1985) In vitro propagation of vine. USA Patent No 4,532,733, Aug 6, 1985Google Scholar
  76. Krul, WR, Worley JF (1977) Formation of adventitious embryos in callus cultures of ‘Seyval’, a French hybrid grape. J Am Soc Hort Sci 102:360-363Google Scholar
  77. Krul ER, Mowbray GH (1984) Grapes. In: Sharp WR, Evans D, Ammirato PV, Yamada Y (eds), Handbook of Plant Cell Cultures. Vol II, Crop Species, Mcmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Kuksova VB, Piven NM, Gleba YY (1997) Somaclonal variation and in vitro induced mutagenesis in grapevine. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 49:17-27Google Scholar
  79. Leal F, Pais MS, Ortiz JM, Guedes-Pinto H, Pinto-Carnide O (2008) Molecular analysis of Vitis vinifera L plants obtained by somatic embryogenesis. Acta Hortic (in press)Google Scholar
  80. Lebrun L, Branchard M (1986) Embryogenèse ‘indefinie’ chez Vitis sp cultivé in vitro. Proc 3° Symp Intern sur Physiologie de la Vigne, 24-27 June 1986, Bordeaux, FranceGoogle Scholar
  81. Lápez-Pérez J, Carreño J, Martínez-Cutillas A, Dabauza M (2005) High embryogenic ability and plant regeneration of table grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L) induced by activated charcoal. Vitis 44:79-85Google Scholar
  82. Maës O, Coutos-Thévenot P, Jouenne T, Boulay M, Guern J (1997) Influence of extracellular proteins, proteases and protease inhibitors on grapevine somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 50:97-105Google Scholar
  83. Maillot P, Kieffer F, Walter B (2006) Somatic embryogenesis from stem nodal sections of grapevine. Vitis 45:185-189Google Scholar
  84. Maitz M, Trampler F, Gröschl M, da Câmara Machado, A, Laimer da Câmara Machado M (2000) Use of an ultrasound cell retention system for the size fractionation of somatic embryos of woody species. Plant Cell Rep 19:1057–1063Google Scholar
  85. Marchenko AO (1991) Induction of embryogenesis in primary calluses from grape stems and leaves. Fiziologiya Rastenii 38:580-591Google Scholar
  86. Margosan DA, Emershad RL, Ramming DW (1994) Origin of somatic embryos from embryo rescue cultures of seedless grapes (Vitis vinifera L). Proc Intern Symp on Table Grape Production, 28-29 June 1994, Anaheim, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  87. Marsoni M, Bracale M, Espen L, Prinsi B, Negri AS, Vannini C (2008) Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Vitis vinifera. Plant Cell Rep 27:347–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Martinelli L, Mandolino G (1994) Genetic transformation and regeneration of transgenic plants in grapevine (Vitis rupestris S). Theor Appl Genet 88:621-628Google Scholar
  89. Martinelli L, Mandolino G (2001) Genetic transformation in Vitis. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  90. Martinelli L, Gribaudo I (2001) Somatic embryogenesis in grapevine (Vitis spp). In: Roubelakis- Angelakis KA (ed) Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of the Grapevine. Kluwer Acad Publ, NLGoogle Scholar
  91. Martinelli L, Bragagna P, Poletti V, Scienza A (1993a) Somatic embryogenesis from leaf- and petiole-derived callus of Vitis rupestris. Plant Cell Rep 12:207-210Google Scholar
  92. Martinelli L, Scienza A, Villa P, De Ponti, P, Gianazza E (1993b) Enzyme markers for somatic embryogenesis in Vitis. J Plant Physiol 141:476-481Google Scholar
  93. Martinelli L, Buzkan N, Minafra A, Saldarelli P, Costa D, Poletti V, Festi S, Perl A, Martelli GP (2000) Genetic transformation of tobacco and grapevines for resistance to viruses related to the rugose wood disease complex. Acta Hort 528:321-327Google Scholar
  94. Martinelli L, Candioli E, Costa D, Poletti V, Rascio N (2001a) Morphogenic competence of secondary somatic embryos with a long culture history. Plant Cell Rep 20:279-284Google Scholar
  95. Martinelli L, Gribaudo I, Bertoldi D, Candioli E, Poletti V (2001b) High efficiency somatic embryogenesis and plant germination in grapevine cultivars Chardonnay and Brachetto a grappolo lungo. Vitis 40:111-115Google Scholar
  96. Martinelli L, Candioli E, Costa D, Minafra A (2002) Stable insertion and expression of the movement protein gene of Grapevine Virus A (GVA) in grape lines (Vitis rupestris S). Vitis 41:189-193Google Scholar
  97. Martinelli L, Gribaudo I, Semenzato M, Poletti V, Gambino G (2003) Ovary as valuable explant for somatic embryogenesis induction in grapes (Vitis spp). Acta Hort 603:499-504Google Scholar
  98. Martinelli L, Zambanini J, Grando S (2004) Genotype assessment of grape regenerants from floral explants. Vitis 43:119-122Google Scholar
  99. Matsuta N, Hirabayashi T (1989) Embryogenic cell lines from somatic embryos of grape (Vitis vinifera L). Plant Cell Rep 7:684-687Google Scholar
  100. Mauro MC, Nef C, Fallot J (1986) Stimulation of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from anther culture of Vitis vinifera cv Cabernet Sauvignon. Plant Cell Rep 5:377-380Google Scholar
  101. Mordhorst AP, Toonen MAJ, de Vries S (1997) Plant embryogenesis. Plant Sci 16:535-576Google Scholar
  102. Morgana C, Di Lorenzo R, Carimi F (2004) Somatic embryogenesis of Vitis vinifera L (cv Sugraone) from stigma and style culture. Vitis 43:169-173Google Scholar
  103. Motoike SY, Skirvin RM, Norton MA, Ottenbacher AG (2001) Somatic embryogenesis and long term maintenance of embryogenic lines from fox grapes. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 66:121-131Google Scholar
  104. Mozsar J, Sule S (1994) A rapid method for somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from cultured anthers of Vitis riparia. Vitis 33:245-246Google Scholar
  105. Mozsar J, Viczian O (1996) Genotype effect on somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Vitis spp. Vitis 35:155-157Google Scholar
  106. Mullins MG (1990) Applications of tissue culture to the genetic improvement of grapevine. Proc 5th Intern Symp on Grape Breeding. Vitis (sp issue):399-407Google Scholar
  107. Mullins MG, Rajasekaran K (1980) Plantlets from cultured anthers of Vitis species and hybrids. Proc 3dt Int Symp on Grape Breeding, Davis, CA :111-119Google Scholar
  108. Mullins MG, Srinivasan C (1976) Somatic embryos and plantlets from an ancient clone of the grapevine (cv Cabernet Sauvignon) by apomixis in vitro. J Exp Bot 27:1022-1030Google Scholar
  109. Mullins MG, Tang FCA, Facciotti D (1990) Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of grapevines: transgenic plants of Vitis rupestris Scheele and buds of Vitis vinifera L. Bio/Technology 8:1041-1045Google Scholar
  110. Nakajima I, Matsuda N (2003) Somatic embryogenesis from filaments of Vitis vinifera L, Vitis labruscana Bailey. Vitis 42:53-54Google Scholar
  111. Nakajima I, Kobayashi S, Nakamura Y (2000) Embryogenic callus induction and plant regeneration from unfertilized ovule of ‘Kyoho’ grape. J Japan Soc Hortic Sci 69:186-188Google Scholar
  112. Nakano M, Sakakibara T, Watanabe Y, Mii M (1997) Establishment of embryogenesis cultures in several cultivars of Vitis vinifera and V. labruscana. Vitis 36:141-145Google Scholar
  113. Nakano M, Watanabe Y, Hoshino Y (2000) Histological examination of callogenesis and adventitious embryogenesis in immature ovary culture of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 75:154-160Google Scholar
  114. Newton DJ, Goussard PG (1990) The ontogeny of somatic embryos from in vitro cultured grapevine anthers. S Afr J Enol Vitic 11:70-75Google Scholar
  115. Nookaraju A, Barreto MS, Agrawal DC (2008) Cellular polyamines influence maturation and germination of somatic embryos from pro-embryonal masses of two grapevine cultivars. Vitis 47:31-34Google Scholar
  116. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473-497Google Scholar
  117. Nitsch JP, Nitsch C (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science 163:85-87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Pearce D, Pharis RP, Rajasekaran K, Mullins MG (1987) Effects of chilling and ABA on (3H)gibberellin A4 metabolism in somatic embryos of grape (Vitis vinifera L x V rupestris Scheele). Plant Physiol 80:381-385Google Scholar
  119. Perl A, Saad S, Sahar N, Holland D (1995) Establishment of long-term embryogenic cultures of seedless Vitis vinifera cultivars – a synergistic effect of auxins and the role of abscisic acid. Plant Sci 104:193-200Google Scholar
  120. Perl A, Lotan O, Abu-Abied M, Holland D (1996) Establishment of an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system for grape (Vitis vinifera L): The role of antioxidants during grape–Agrobacterium interactions. Nature Biotech14:624-628Google Scholar
  121. Perl A, Eshdat Y (2007) Grape. In: Pua EC, Davey MR (eds) Transgenic Crops V Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 189-208Google Scholar
  122. Perrin M, Martin D, Joly D, Demangeat G, This P, Masson JE (2001) Medium-dependent response of grapevine somatic embryogenic cells. Plant Sci 161:107-116Google Scholar
  123. Perrin M, Gertz C, Masson JE (2004) High efficiency initiation of regenerable embryogenic callus from anther filaments of 19-grapevine genotypes grown worldwide. Plant Sci 167:1343-49Google Scholar
  124. Pinto-Sintra AL, (2007) Establishment of embryogenic cultures and plant regeneration in the Portuguese cultivar Touriga Nacional of Vitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 88:253-265Google Scholar
  125. Popescu CF, Falk A, Glimelius K (2002) Application of AFLPs to characterize somaclonal variation in anther-derived grapevines. Vitis 41:177-182Google Scholar
  126. Quiroz-Figueroa RF, Rojas-Herrera R, Galaz-Avalos RM, Loyola-Vargas VM (2006) Embryo production through somatic embryogenesis can be used to study cell differentiation in plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 86:285-301Google Scholar
  127. Rajasekaran K, Mullins MG (1979) Embryo and plantlets from cultured anthers of hybrid grapevines. J Exp Bot 30:399-407Google Scholar
  128. Rajasekaran K, Mullins MG (1983) The origin of embryos and plantlets from cultured anthers of hybrid grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 34:108-113Google Scholar
  129. Rajasekaran K, Vine J, Mullins MG (1982) Dormancy in somatic embryos and seeds of Vitis: changes in endogenous abscisic acid during embryogeny and germination. Planta 154:139-144Google Scholar
  130. Redenbaugh K, Paasch BD, Nichol JW, Kossler ME, Viss PR, Walker KA (1986) Somatic seeds: encapsulation of asexual plant embryos. Bio/Technol 4:797-801Google Scholar
  131. Redon C, Albert P, Lacorre-Arescaldino I, Mauro MC, Bierne J (1996) Transition in histone H1 from globular to torpedo stage in grapevine somatic embryos. Proc Intern Congress French Soc Developm Biol (SFBD), Maternal and zygotic genes during embryonic development. May 29-31, 1996, Caen, F, A57 P, 35SGoogle Scholar
  132. Redon C, Albert P, Lacorre-Arescaldino I, Mauro MC, Bierne J (1999) Electrophoretic heterogeneity of grapevine histones. Am J Enol Vitic 50:13-18Google Scholar
  133. Reinert J (1958) Untersuchungen uber die Morphogenese an Gewebekulturen. Ber Dtch Ges 71:15Google Scholar
  134. Reustle G, Harst M, Alleweldt G (1995) Plant regeneration of grapevine (Vitis sp) protoplasts isolated from embryogenic tissues. Plant Cell Rep 15:238-241Google Scholar
  135. Robacker C (1993) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from muscadine grape leaf explants. HortSci 28:53-55Google Scholar
  136. Salunkhe CK, Rao PS, Mhatre M (1997) Induction of somatic embryogenesis and plantlets in tendrils of Vitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Rep 17:65-7Google Scholar
  137. Salunkhe CK, Rao PS, Mhatre M (1999) Plantlet regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in anther callus of Vitis latifolia L. Plant Cell Rep 18:670-673Google Scholar
  138. Scorza R, Cordts JM, Ramming DW, Emershad RL (1995) Transformation of grape (Vitis vinifera L) zygotic-derived somatic embryos and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 14:589-592Google Scholar
  139. Scorza R, Cordts JM, Gray DJ, Gonsalves D, Emershad RL, Ramming DW (1996) Producing transgenic Thompson Seedless grape (Vitis vinifera L). J Amer Soc Hort Sci 12:616-619Google Scholar
  140. Sefc KM, Ruckenbauer P, Regner F (1997) Embryogenesis in microspore culture of Vitis subspecies. Vitis 36:15-20Google Scholar
  141. Skene KGM, Goodwins DR, Barlass M (1988) Ploidy stability in grapevines following long term storage in vitro. Vitis 27:41-44Google Scholar
  142. Soulie O, Roustan J-P, Fallot J (1993) Early in vitro selection of eutypine-tolerant plantlets Application to screening of Vitis vinifera cv Ugni blanc somaclones. Vitis 32:243-244Google Scholar
  143. Srinivasan C, Mullins MG (1980) High-frequency somatic embryo production from unfertilized ovules of grapes. Sci Hortic 13:245-252Google Scholar
  144. Stamp JA, Meredith CP (1988a) Somatic embryogenesis from leaves and anthers of grapevine. Sci Hortic 35:235-250Google Scholar
  145. Stamp JA, Meredith CP (1988b) Proliferative somatic embryogenesis from zygotic embryos of grapevine. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 113:941-945Google Scholar
  146. Steward FC, Mapes MO, Mears M (1958) Growth and organized development of cultures cells. II Organization in cultures grown from freely suspended cells. Am J Bot 45:705-708Google Scholar
  147. Takeno K, Koshioka M, Pharis RP, Rajasekaran K, Mullins MG (1983) Endogenous gibberellinlike substances in somatic embryos of grape (Vitis vinifera x Vitis rupestris) in relation to embryogenesis and the chilling requirement for subsequent development of mature embryos. Plant Physiol 73:803-808PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Taylor RL (1967) The foliar embryos of Malaxis paludosa. Can J Bot 45:1553-1556Google Scholar
  149. This P, Jung A, Boccacci P, Borrego J, Botta R, Costantini L, Crespan M, Dangl GS, Eisenheld C, Ferreira-Monteiro F, Grando MS, Ibanez J, Lacombe T, Laucou V, Magalhaes R, Meredith CP, Milani N, Peterlunger E, Regner F, Zulini, L, Maul E (2004) Development of a standard set of microsatellite reference alleles for identification of grape cultivars. Theor Appl Gen 109:1448-1458Google Scholar
  150. Torregrosa L (1995) Biotechnologie de la vigne: les techniques de régénération in vitro (synthèse). Progr Agric Vitic 112:479-489Google Scholar
  151. Torregrosa L (1998) A simple and efficient method to obtain stable embryogenic cultures from anthers of Vitis vinifera L. Vitis 37:91-92Google Scholar
  152. Torregrosa L, Bouquet, A, Goussard PG (2001) In vitro culture and propagation of grapevine. In: Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (ed) Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of the Grapevine. Kluwer Acad Publ, NLGoogle Scholar
  153. Torres-Viñals M, Sabaté-Casaseca S, Aktouche N, Grenan S, Lopez G, Porta-Falguera M, Torregrosa L (2004) Large-scale production of somatic embryos as a source of hypocotyl explants for Vitis vinifera micrografting. Vitis 43:163-168Google Scholar
  154. Tsolova V, Atanassov A (1996) Plant regeneration of Vitis sp via repetitive embryogenesis. Biotechnol & Biotechnol Eq 10/1996/1:32-34Google Scholar
  155. Vilaplana M, Mullins MG (1989) Regeneration of grapevine (Vitis spp) in vitro: formation of adventitious buds on hypocotyls and cotyledons of somatic embryos. J Plant Physiol 134:413-419Google Scholar
  156. Yarbrough YA (1932) Anatomical and developmental studies of the foliar embryos of Bryphyllum calycinum. Am J Bot 19:443-453Google Scholar
  157. Wang Q, Mawassi M, Sahar N, Li P, Colova-Tsolova V, Sela I, Gafny R, Tanne, E, Perl A (2004) Cryopreservation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L) embryogenic cell suspensions by encapsulation-vitrification. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 77:267-275Google Scholar
  158. Xu X, Lu J (2009) Somatic embryogenesis from seed integuments of seedless grape cultivars. Acta Hortic (in press)Google Scholar
  159. Xu X, Lu J, Dalling D, Jattayasothorn Y, Grosser JW (2007) Isolation and culture of grape protoplasts from embryogenic suspension cultures and leaves of Vitis vinifera and Vitis rotundifolia. Acta Hortic 738:787-790Google Scholar
  160. Yang XM, Cao ZY, An LZ, Wang YM, Fang XW (2006) In vitro tetraploid induction via colchicine treatment from diploid somatic embryos in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L). Euphytica 152:217-224Google Scholar
  161. Zhu YM, Hoshino Y, Nakano M, Takahashi E, Mii M (1997) Highly efficient system of plant regeneration from protoplasts of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L) through somatic embryogenesis by using embryogenic callus culture and activated charcoal. Plant Sci 123:151-157Google Scholar
  162. Zlenko VA, Kotikov IV, Troshin LP (2002) Efficient GA3-assisted plant regeneration from cell suspensions of three grape genotypes via somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 70:295-299Google Scholar
  163. Zlenko VA, Kotikov IV, Troshin LP (2005) Effects of IAA and BA on development of globular, heart- and torpedo-stage embryos from cell suspensions of three grape genotypes. Sci Hortic 104:237-247Google Scholar
  164. Zou CJ, Li PF (1981) Induction of pollen plants of grape (Vitis vinifera L). Acta Bot Sinica 23:79-81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Martinelli
    • 1
  • I. Gribaudo
    • 2
  1. 1.Genomics and Crop Biology AreaFondazione Edmund Mach-IASMA Research and Innovation CentreItaly
  2. 2.Grugliasco UnitPlant Virology Institute IVV-CNRItaly

Personalised recommendations