Advertisement

The practice of environmental management increasingly recognizes the importance of scale and cross-scale dynamics in understanding and addressing global challenges. The problem is not only how to downscale the global modeling results, but how to make them more suitable for the specific applications. The paper shows some approaches to the development and application of regional climate change projections in Moldavian research. The results of six AOGCM experiments, based on SRES A2 and B2 emission scenarios for three time-slices (2010–2039; 2040–2069; 2070–2099), served as a basis for downscaling. It was shown that for any sound climate change impact assessment at least four types of information are necessary: the climate change projections for a country on the whole; the expected climate changes in any place within a country's territory; daily projections of key climatic variables, and information satisfying the demands of particular researches. Country-scale projections were calculated as averaged weighted sum of the ensemble of GCM simulations. A special algorithm was proposed to select the ‘best’ ensemble. The diurnal changes in climatic variables were calculated from their monthly values approximated by high-degree polynomials. The correlation between observed values at weather stations and a corresponding value for the country were used for spatial transformation of the latter. The methods of development of user-oriented projections depended on the system under assessment. Some approaches to vulnerability assessment through integrating climate change projections with systems' sensitivity are demonstrated on the example of natural and agricultural ecosystems.

Keywords

climate change downscaling natural ecosystems agriculture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Addink H, Arts B, Mol A (2003) Climate change policy in changing contexts: globalization, political modernization and legal innovation. In: van Ierland EC, Gupta J and Kok MJ (eds.) Issues in International Climate Policy: Theory and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, US, 75–94.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environ Change 15:77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benestad, RE (2000) Empirically downscaled multimodel ensemble temperature and precipitation scenarios for Norway. J Climate 15:3008–3027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brunet IM, Lopez D (eds.) (2001) Detecting and Modelling Regional Climate Change. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/Paris/New York.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Busuioc A, Chen D, Hellstrom M (2001) Performance of statistical downscaling models in GCM validation and regional climate change estimates: application for Swedish precipitation. Int J Climatol 21:557–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carter TR (2001) Uncertainties in assessing the impacts of regional climate change. In: Brunet IM, Lopez Bonillo D (eds.) Detecting and Modelling Regional Climate Change. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/Paris/New York, 441–469.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carter TR, Jones RN, Lu X, et al. (2007) New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, et al. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 133–171.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cash DW, Moser SC (2000) Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environ Change 10:109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corobov R (2001) Downscaling of the global climate change projections: some approaches. In: Brunet IM, Lopez Bonillo D (eds.) Detecting and Modelling Regional Climate Change. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/Paris/New York, 491–499.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corobov R (2002) Estimations of climate change impacts on crop production in the Republic of Moldova. GeoJ 57:125–131.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corobov R (ed.) (2004) Moldova's Climate in XXI Century: The Projections of Changes, Impacts, and Responses. Chisinau, Elan Poligraf. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corobov R, Nicolenco A (2004) New projections of Moldova's climate change in XXI century. In: Corobov R (ed) Moldova's Climate in XXI Century: The Projections of Changes, Impacts, and Responses. Chisinau, Elan Poligraf, 55–98.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corobov R, Overcenko A (2007) Use of climate modeling outputs for regionalization of global climate projections. In: Problems of Ecological Monitoring and Ecosystem Modelling, Vol. XXI. St Petersburg, Gidrometeoizdat, 122–145.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corobov R, Cealic S, Buiucli P (2004) Assessment of crop production sensitivity to likely climate change. In: Problems of Ecological Monitoring and Ecosystem Modelling, Vol. XXI. St Petersburg, Gidrometeoizdat, 215–255.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Froyn CB (2005) Decision criteria, scientific uncertainty, and the global warming controversy. Mitig Adapt Strat Global Change 10:183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gaffin SR, Rosenzweig C, Xing X, et al. (2004) Downscaling and geo-spatial gridding of socio-economic projections from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). Global Environ Change 14:105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giorgi F, Mearns LO (2002) Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate CHANGES from AOGCM simulations via the “Reliability Ensemble Averaging” (REA) Method. J Climate 15:1141–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ha-Duong M, Swart R, Bernstein L, et al. (2007) Uncertainty management in the IPCC: agreeing to disagree. Global Environ Change 17:8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al. (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, et al. (eds) Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    IPCC Data Distribution Center (DDC) (2005) Access to the GCM Archive (SRES scenario runs) http://ipcc-ddc.cru.uea.ac.uk/.
  22. 22.
    IPCC-TGCIA (1999) Guideline on the Use of Scenario of Climate Impact and Adaptation Assessment. Version 1 (Prepared by Carter TR, Hulme M, Lal M) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Task Group on Scenarios for Climate Impact Assessment.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jacques P (2006) Downscaling climate models and environmental policy: from global to regional politics. J Environ Plan Manag 49(2):301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Joáo E (2002) How scale affects environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22:289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kharin VV, Zwiers FW (2002) Climate predictions with multimodel ensembles. J Climate 15:793–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mcguffie K, Henderson-Sellers A (2001) Forty years of numerical climate modeling. Int J Climatol 21:1067–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Murphy J (2000) Predictions of climate change over Europe using statistical and dynamical downscaling techniques. Int J Climatol 20:489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Special Report on Emission Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shabanova G, Izverscaia T (2004) Sensitivity of Moldova's natural plant communities to climate change. In: Corobjv (ed) Moldova's climate in XXI century: the projections of changes, impacts, and responses. Chisinau, Elan Poligraf, 99–151.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Therivel R, Ross B (2007) Cumulative effects assessment: Does scale matter? Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    UNDP (2007) Human Development Report 2007/2008. Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    UNFCCC (n.d.) National Reports. http://unfccc.int/national_reports/items/1408.php
  33. 33.
    UNFCCC (2005) Caring for Climate. A guide to the Climate Change Convention and the Kyoto Protocol (revised 2005 edition). Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Widmann M, Bretherton CS (2003) Statistical precipitation downscaling over the Northwestern United States using numerically simulated precipitation as a predictor. J Climate 16:799–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roman Corobov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsModern University for HumanitiesChisinauMoldova

Personalised recommendations