Causes of Cropland Abandonment During the Post-socialist Transition in Southern Romania

  • Daniel Müller
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

We analyzed the causes of cropland abandonment in Argeş County, Romania, after the fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989. Cropland changes were derived from LandSat classifications for 1990, 1995, and 2005. Total net abandonment amounted to 21% of the 1990 cropland. Land cover data were integrated with environmental and socioeconomic variables and jointly analyzed using spatially explicit logistic regressions to estimate the determinants of cropland abandonment. Results suggest that abandonment was more likely on isolated cropland patches and rougher terrain throughout the transition period. Market forces increasingly shape the patterns of cropland abandonment in later stages of the post-socialist transition, as witnessed by the increasing contribution of variables affecting the profitability of cultivation.


land abandonment LandSat post-socialist Southern Romania 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anselin L (2001) Spatial Econometrics. In: Baltagi B (ed) Companion to Theoretical Econometrics. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Besag JE (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 36: 192–236Google Scholar
  4. Bicik I, Jelecek L, Stepanek V (2001) Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Policy 18: 65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brouwer F, Baldock D, la Chapelle C (2001) Agriculture and Nature Conservation in the Candidate Countries: Perspectives in Interaction. Ministry of Agriculture. Nature Management and Fisheries, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. Chilonda P, Otte J (2006) Indicators to monitor trends in livestock production at national, regional and international levels. Accessed 22 November 2006
  7. Cremene C, Groza G, Rakosy L, Schileyko AA, Baur A, Erhardt A, Baur B (2005) Alterations of steppe-like grasslands in eastern Europe: A threat to regional biodiversity hotspots. Conservation Biology 19: 1606–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gellrich M, Baur P, Koch B, Zimmermann NE (2007) Agricultural land abandonment and natural forest re-growth in the Swiss mountains: A spatially explicit economic analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118: 93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Government Service for Land and Water Management (2005) Land abandonment, biodiversity and the CAP in relation to the 1st and 2nd pillars of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy. DLG, Outcome of an international seminar in Sigulda, Latvia, 7–8 October, 2004, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutierrez R, Drukker DM (2005) Reference for cluster-correlated robust variance calculation. Accessed 8 May 2006
  11. Houghton RA, Hackler JL, Lawrence KT (1999) The U.S. carbon budget: Contributions from land-use change. Science 285: 574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hunsaker CT, Levine DA (1995) Hierarchical approaches to the study of water quality in rivers. BioScience 45: 193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ioffe G, Nefedova T, Zaslavsky I (2004) From spatial continuity to fragmentation: The case of Russian farming. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94: 913–943Google Scholar
  14. Kuemmerle T, Hostert P, Radeloff V, van der Linden S, Perzanowski K, Kruhlov I (2008) Cross-border Comparison of post-socialist farmland abandonment in the Carpathians. Ecosystems 11: 614–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Griffiths P, Rusu M (forthcoming) Land use change in Romania after the collapse of socialism. Regional Environmental ChangeGoogle Scholar
  16. Laiolo P, Dondero F, Ciliento E, Rolando A (2004) Consequences of pastoral abandonment for the structure and diversity of the alpine avifauna. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lerman Z, Csaki C, Feder G (2004) Evolving farm structures and land use patterns in former socialist countries. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 43: 309–335Google Scholar
  18. Maddala GS (1983) Limited-Dependent Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nuclear Medcine 8: 283–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Müller D, Munroe DK (2008) Changing rural landscapes in Albania: Cropland abandonment and forest clearing in the postsocialist transition. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98: 855–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller D, Zeller M (2002) Land use dynamics in the Central Highlands of Vietnam: A spatial model combining village survey data with satellite imagery interpretation. Agricultural Economics 27: 333–354Google Scholar
  22. Müller D, Kuemmerle T, Rusu M, Griffith P (2009) Lost in transition: Determinants of cropland abandonment in postsocialist Romania. Journal of Land Use Science 4: 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nikodemus O, Bell S, Grine I, Liepins I (2005) The impact of economic, social and political factors on the landscape structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia. Landscape and Urban Planning 70: 57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palang H, Printsmann A, Gyuró ÉK, Urbanc M, Skowronek E, Woloszyn W (2006) The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecology 21: 347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perz SG, Skole DL (2003) Social determinants of secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Science Research 32: 25–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peterson U, Aunap R (1998) Changes in agricultural land use in Estonia in the 1990s detected with multitemporal Landsat MSS imagery. Landscape and Urban Planning 41: 193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pontius RGJ (2000) Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 66: 1011–1016Google Scholar
  28. Pontius RGJ, Milliones M (2008) Problems and Solutions for Kappa-based Indices of Agreement, Studying, Modeling, and Sense Making of Planet Earth. Mytilene, Lesvos, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  29. Slater JA, Garvey G, Johnston C, Haase J, Heady B, Kroenung G, Little J (2006) The SRTM data “finishing” process and products. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 72: 237–247Google Scholar
  30. Tasser E, Mader M, Tappeiner U (2003) Effects of land use in alpine grasslands on the probability of landslides. Basic and Applied Ecology 4: 271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tasser E, Walde J, Tappeiner U, Teutsch A, Noggler W (2007) Land-use changes and natural reforestation in the Eastern Central Alps. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118: 115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams RL (2000) A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics 56: 645–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. World Bank (2008) World Development Indicators 2008. The World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Müller
    • 1
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
    • 2
  1. 1.Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO)Halle (Saale)Germany
  2. 2.Department of Forest and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations