Advertisement

Recent Trends in Land Surface Phenologies Within the Don and Dnieper River Basins from the Perspective of MODIS Collection 4 Products

  • Valeriy Kovalskyy
  • Geoffrey Henebry
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

During the past 2 decades Eastern Europe has been going through one of the most abrupt socioeconomic transformations in recent times. As core areas for regional agricultural production, the basins of the Dnieper and Don Rivers, the institutional changes have impacted the terrestrial vegetation cover dynamics. As regional economies entered recovery phases starting around the year 2000, the observed trends in land surface phenologies have, in some locations, changed their previous downward direction. We analyze here image time series of MODIS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Land Surface Temperature from Collection 4 data products. Our main objective is to characterize and summarize the extent of negative and positive trends in land surface phenologies across the study area and draw linkages between trends in indicators of surface vegetation and those in the radiometric skin temperature.

Keywords

phenology Don and Dnieper Rivers land cover changes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badalyan KM (2008) Statistical Bulletin of Agricultural production in Southern Federal Region, Report for 2000–2007. Federal Agency of Statistics for Southern Region of Russian Federation: Rostov. http://rostov.gks.ru/public/Lists/publishing/DetailForm.aspx?ID=432.
  2. Bondeau A, Smith P, Zaehle S, SchaphoffS, Lucht W, Cramer W, Gerten D, Lotze-Campen H, Müller C, Reichstein M, Smith B (2007) Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biology 13:679–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Beurs KM, Henebry GM (2004a) Land surface phenology, climatic variation, and institutional change: analyzing agricultural and cover change in Kazakhstan. Remote Sensing of Environment 89:497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Beurs KM, Henebry GM (2004b) Trend analysis of the Pathfinder AVHRR Land (PAL) NDVI data for the deserts of Central Asia. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 1(4):282–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Beurs KM, Henebry GM (2005a) A statistical framework for the analysis of long image time series. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26:1551–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Beurs KM, Henebry GM (2005b) Land surface phenology and temperature variation in the IGBP High-Latitude transects. Global Change Biology 11:779–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Beurs KM, Henebry GM (2008) Northern annular mode effects on the land surface phenologies of Northern Eurasia. Journal of Climate 21:4257–4279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher JI, Mustard JF (2007) Cross-scalar satellite phenology from ground, Landsat, and MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment 109:261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kathuroju N, White MA, Symanzik J, Schwartz M (2007) On the use of the advanced very high resolution radiometer for development of prognostic land surface phenology model. Ecological Modelling 201:144–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knight JF, Lunetta RS, Ediriwickrema, J, Khorram S (2006) Regional scale land cover characterization using MODIS-NDVI 250 m multi-temporal imagery: a phenology-based approach. GIScience and Remote Sensing 43:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ostapchuk YM (2004) Statistical Yearbook “Agriculture of Ukraine” for 2003. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, Kyiv. Accessed 24 June 2008.Google Scholar
  12. Ostapchuk YM (2005) Statistical Yearbook “Environment of Ukraine” for 2004. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine, Kyiv.Google Scholar
  13. Ostapchuk YM (2008) Agricultural production in Ukraine, Report for 1900–2007. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine., Kyiv. http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.Google Scholar
  14. Reed BC (2006) Trend analysis of time-series phenology of North America derived from satellite data. GIScience and Remote Sensing 43:24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Revenga C, Nackoney J, Hoshino E, Kura Y, Maidens J (2003) Water Resources eAtlas. World Resources Institute. http://multimedia.wri.org/watersheds_2003/eu7.html.
  16. White MA, Brunsell N, Schwartz MD (2003) Vegetation phenology in global change studies. In Schwartz MD (ed.), Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science. Kluwer, Boston, pp. 453–466.Google Scholar
  17. White MA, Hoffman F, Hargrove WW, Nemani RR (2005) A global framework for monitoring phenological responses to climate change. Geophysical Research Letters 32:L04705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valeriy Kovalskyy
    • 1
  • Geoffrey Henebry
    • 1
  1. 1.Geographic Information Science Center of ExcellenceSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA

Personalised recommendations