Global Land Project: Major Scientific Questions for Coupled Modeling of Land Systems
This chapter describes some scientific challenges for coupled modeling of land systems at the interface of human and environmental systems. These include examining the character and operation of drivers of change and processes representation of drivers in models. A variety of examples of land use change, primarily from rural areas, are used to examine drivers of land use change and identify processes. The drivers examined are (i) technology, (ii) economic and structural/policy, and (iii) societal factors. These identify processes of innovation, adoption and diffusion, in relation to technology, and decision making for all socio-economic drivers. Decision making is founded on both economic and social criteria, including individual preferences, values and behaviours that influence choice and decision-making.
Keywordsland system drivers of change Scotland
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter S R, Chapin F S, Coe M T, Daily G C, Gibbs H K, Helkowski J H, Holloway T, Howard E A, Kucharik C J, Monfreda C, Patz J A, Prentice I C, Ramankutty N, and P K Snyder (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- GLP (2005) Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. In IGBP Report No. 53/IHDP Report No. 19, 64Google Scholar
- Hansson M and H Fogelfors (1998) Management of permanent set-aside on arable land in Sweden. J App Ecol 35(5):758–771Google Scholar
- Lambin E F and H Geist eds (2006) Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts. Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
- National Research Council (NRC) (2001) Grand Challenges in the Environmental Sciences. In Report from the Committee on Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences., 96. Washington DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar
- Walsh S J, Evans T P, Welsh W F, Entwisle B, and R R Rindfuss (1999) Scale-dependent relationships between population and environment in northeastern Thailand. PERS 65(1):97–105Google Scholar