In this chapter, the experiences and aspirations of one European university, Strathclyde in Glasgow, are examined to see what practical value a European classification of higher education institutions would provide. Institutional rankings have developed more rapidly in the United Kingdom than elsewhere in the European Union and British universities such as Strathclyde have amassed many years of experience in dealing with the managerial consequences of league tables. For them, classification holds out the alluring prospect of being compared with like institutions within the rich diversity of European higher education.
The pressure to perform well in the institutional rankings is rising inexorably. Rankings have become so closely linked with both external reputation and institutional self-image that they can no longer be ignored. Yet they can easily pull an institution away from its unique mission, often aligned with the particular needs of the local community, towards the orthodoxy that secures league table success. Thus league tables are the enemy of diversity.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford/New York: Pergamon/IAU Press.
Figel, J. (2008). Speech presented at launch of European Commission University/Industry Forum, Brussels, February.
Florian, R.V. (2007). Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics, 72(1), 25–32, doi: 10.1007/x11192-007-1712-1.
Hood, J. (2006). Paper presented at annual conference of the Association of Heads of University Administrations, University of Oxford, 4 April.
Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2008). Counting what is measured, or measuring what counts? League and their impact on higher education institutions in England. Report to HEFCE by the Center for Higher Education Research and Information (CHERI), Open University & Hobsons Research. HEFCE Issues Paper, 2008/14.
Times Higher Education (THE). (2008). Free sector and let fees rise, argue Lords, 3 July.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
West, P., Hansen, S. (2009). Using the Classification for Institutional Profiling: The University of Strathclyde. In: van Vught, F. (eds) Mapping the Higher Education Landscape. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2249-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2249-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2248-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2249-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)