Skip to main content

Exploring Techno-Moral Change: The Case of the ObesityPill

  • Chapter
Evaluating New Technologies

Abstract

Technology is a major force in modern societies, co-shaping most of its aspects, including established moral norms and values. Technology Assessment aims to explore the consequences of New and Emerging Science and Technology [NEST] in advance, to help create better technology. This article develops a method for enhancing our moral imagination with regard to future techno-moral change. At the core of this method lies so-called NEST-ethics, the argumentative patterns and tropes that constitute the ‘grammar’ of ethical discussions about emerging technologies. This grammar can be applied to explore at forehand the moral controversies and even the moral changes that are provoked by these technologies. In the form of alternative techno-moral scenarios these explorations can be used to inform and enhance public deliberation on the desirability of the NEST in question. This results in a type of ethical TA that is self-reflective regarding its own moral standards. To illustrate our method, we offer ‘fragments’ of a techno-moral scenario on the moral consequences of the introduction of a future ObesityPill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berman, M. (1983). All That Is Solid Melts Into Air. The Experience of Modernity (3 ed.). London, New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutic and Praxis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. (2001). The Need for Public Intellectuals. A Space for STS. Science, Technology & Human Values, 28(4), 443–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelberg, M. (2007). Imagination and Principles. An Essay on the Role of Imagination in Moral Reasoning. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. New York: H.Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1954). The Later Works. Athens OH: Swallow Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen, J. (Ed.). (2002). Over levenskunst. De grote filosofen over het goede leven. Amsterdam: Ambo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, M. P. (2007). Why Public Participation in Risk Regulation? The Case of Authorizing GMO Products in the European Union. Science as Culture, 16(4), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and Moral Imagination. Pragmatism in Ethics. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). Wharheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik (Vol. Band 1). Tübingen: J.C.B.Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1998). Expanding Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, L. R. (1997). The Wisdom of Repugnance. The New Republic, 216(22), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, L. R. (2002). Life, Liberty, and the Defense of Dignity. Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keulartz, J., Korthals, M., Schermer, M., and Swierstra, T. (eds.). (2002). Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture. Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keulartz, J., Schermer, M., Korthals, M., and Swierstra, T. (2004). Ethics in a technological culture. A programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larmore, C. (1987). Patterns of Moral Complexity (2 ed.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logister, L. (2004). Creatieve Democratie. John Deweys pragmatisme als grondslag voor een democratische samenleving. Budel: Damon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, D., and Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology (2 ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. (2002). The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1955). Werke in drei Bänden,(Vol. III). München: Carl Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notten, P. W. F., Rotmans, J., and Asselt, M. B. A. V. (2003). An updated scenario typology. Futures, 35, 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A., and Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change. Volume two: Resources and technology (pp. 327–399). Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (2004). The Case Against Perfection. The Atlantic Monthly(April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermer, M. (2001). The different faces of autonomy. A study on patient autonomy in ethical theory and hospital practice. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind, J. B. (1998). The invention of Autonomy. A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (1 ed.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclove, R. E. (1995). Democracy and Technology. New York, London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1990). Political Philosophy. In C. Schmitt and Q. Skinner (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (2 ed., pp. 389–453). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T. (2002). Moral vocabularies and public debate. The cases of cloning and new reproductive technologies. In J. Keulartz, M. Korthals, M. Schermer and T. Swierstra (Eds.), Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture. Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T. (2004a). Een tumor is ook collectief bezit. Het afstaan van lichaamsmateriaal ten behoeve van DNA-banken. Krisis. Tijdschrift voor empirische filosofie, 5(4), 36–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T. (2004b). Slachtoffer of burger? Een essay over het nader gebruik van lichaamsmateriaal ten behoeve van genomics onderzoek. Amsterdam: NVBE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra, T., and Rip, A. (2007). Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics. Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology. NanoEthics, 1(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trappenburg, M. (2003). Darwin in de medische ethiek. In M. Adams, J. Griffiths and G. d. Hartogh (Eds.), Euthanasie. Nieuwe knelpunten in een voortgezette discussie (pp. 237–254). Kampen: Kok.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Press/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swierstra, T., Stemerding, D., Boenink, M. (2009). Exploring Techno-Moral Change: The Case of the ObesityPill. In: Sollie, P., Düwell, M. (eds) Evaluating New Technologies. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2229-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics