Advertisement

Seksuologie pp 181-195 | Cite as

7 Seksuele diversiteit

  • Ine Vanwesenbeeck
Part of the Quintessens book series (QUI)

Samenvatting

Seksualiteit kent vele sterk universele aspecten, waaronder bijvoorbeeld de fysiologische geslachtskenmerken van vrouwen en mannen en het menselijk vermogen tot orgasme en zwangerschap.

Literatuur

  1. 1.
    American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualisation of Girls. Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualisation of Girls. Washington: American Psychological Association. Retrieved February 22, 2007 from www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html.
  2. 2.
    Baumeister RF, Tice DM. The social dimension of sex. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Okami P, Schackelford T. Human sex differences in sexual psychology and behavior. Ann Rev Sex Res 2001;12:186–241.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hyde JS. The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist 2005;60:581–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vanwesenbeeck I. Doing Gender in Sex and Sex Research. Arch Sex Behavior, in press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simpson JA, Wilson CL, Winterhel HA. Sociosexuality and romantic relationships. In: Harvey JH, et al., editors. The handbook of sexuality in close relationships. London: LEA, 2004:87–112.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laan E, van Stegeren A, Scholte S, van Lunsen R. Genderverschillen en -overeenkomsten in de seksuele respons. T Seksuol 2007;31:113–118.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vanwesenbeeck I, Bakker F, Van Fulpen M, et al. Seks en seksuele risico’s bij vmbo-scholieren anno 2002. T Seksuol 2003;27:30–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graaf H de, Meijer S, Poelman J, Vanwesenbeeck I. Seks onder je 25e. Seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland anno 2005. RNG-studies nr.7. Delft: Eburon, 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vanwesenbeeck I, de Graaf H, Meijer S, Poelman J. Een update over het seksuele gedrag en de seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland: De belangrijkste bevindingen uit ‘Seks onder je 25e’. T Seksuol 2006;30:57–64.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bakker F, Vanwesenbeeck I, redactie. Seksuele gezondheid in Nederland 2006. RNG-studies nr.9. Delft: Eburon, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vanwesenbeeck I, Bakker F. Seksuele gezondheid bij volwassen Nederlanders. De belangrijkste resultaten van een nieuwe populatiestudie, T Seksuol 2007; 31:166–77.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baumeister RF. Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychol Bull 2002;126:347–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diamond LM. Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 2008;44: 5–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bell NJ, O’Neal KK, Schoenrock CJ. Gender and sexual risk. Sex Roles 1999;41:313–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hyde JS, Durik AM. Gender differences in erotic plasticity-evolutionary or sociocultural forces? Comment on Baumeister (2000). Psychological Bulletin 2000;126,375–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diamond LM. Sexual fluidity: understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oliver MB, Hyde JS. Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1993;114:29–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schwartz P, Rutter V. The gender of sexuality. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Pine Forge Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alexander MG, Fisher TD. Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. J Sex Res 2003;40:27–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crawford M, Popp D. Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. J Sex Research 2003;40:13–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fredrickson BL, Roberts T. Objectification theory: Towards understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly 1997;21:173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kiefer AK, Sanchez DT. Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective. Personal Relationships 2007;14:269290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sandfort TGM. Homofobie: Welk probleem? Wiens probleem? T Seksuol 2005;29:11–19.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuyper L, Vanwesenbeeck I. High Levels of Same-Sex Experiences in the Netherlands: Prevalences of Same-Sex Experiences in Historical and International Perspective. J Homosexuality, in press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Patterson CJ. Sexual Orientation Across the Life Span: Introduction to the Special Section. Developmental Psychology 2008;44, 1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peplau LA, Garnets LD. A new paradigm for understanding women’s sexuality and sexual orientation. J Soc Issues 2000;56:329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lippa RA. The Relation Between Sex Drive and Sexual Attraction to Men and Women: A Cross-National Study of Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Homosexual Men and Women. Arch Sex Behavior 2007;36, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bailey JM, Zucker KJ. Childhood sex-typed behavior: A conceptual analysis and quantitative review. Develop Psychol 1995;31:43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rieger G, Linsenmeier JAW, Gygax L, Bailey JM. Sexual orientation and childhood gender nonconformity: Evidence from home videos. Developmental Psychology 2008;44, 46–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lippa RA. Sex Differences in Personality Traits and Gender-Related Occupational Preferences across 53 Nations: Testing Evolutionary and Social-Environmental Theories. Arch Sex Behavior, in press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sandfort T. Sexual orientation and gender: stereotypes and beyond. Arch Sex Behavior 2005;34, 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tolman D, Diamond L. Desegregating sexuality research: Cultural and biological perspective on gender and desire. Ann Rev Sex Res 2001;12:33–74.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bailey JM, Gaulin S, Agyei Y, Gladue BA. Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionary relevant aspects of humanmating psychology. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;66:1081–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Balsam KF, Beauchaine TP, Rothblum ED, Solomon SE. Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples. Dev Psychol 2008;44:102–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Herek GM, Garnets LD. Sexual orientation and mental health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2007;3: 353–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bos HMW, Sandfort TGM, de Bruyn EH, Hakvoort EM. Same-sex attraction, social relationships, psychosocial functioning, and school performance. Developmental Psychology 2008;44:59–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bos H. Parenting in planned lesbian families. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weeks J. Coming out: Homosexual politics in Britain from the 19th century to the present. London: Quartet Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Murray SO. Homosexualities. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mead M. Sex and temperament in three primitive societies. New York: Morrow, 1935.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wellings K, Collumbien M, Slaymaker A, et al. Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective. The Lancet 2006;368:1706–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bhana D, Morrell R, Hearn J, Moletsane R. Power and Identity: An Introduction to Sexualities in Southern Africa. Sexualities 2007;10:131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vanwesenbeeck I. Bittere noodzaak. Een essay over het maatschappelijk belang van een adequate seksuele gezondheidspolitiek. T Sociologie 2008, in press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cleland J, Ali MM. Sexual abstinence, contraception, and condom use by young African women: a secondary analysis of survey data. Lancet 2006;368:1788–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Haas S de, Graaf H de, Kuyper L., Bakker F. Seksuele gezondheid van Turkse, Marokkaanse, Surinaamse en Antilliaanse Nederlanders. Utrecht: Rutgers Nisso Groep, 2008.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vennix P, Vanwesenbeeck I. Seksualiteit en relaties van Turkse en Marokkaanse Nederlanders. RNGstudies nr.8. Delft: Eburon, 2005.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    West C, Zimmerman DH. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1987;1:125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Butler J. Bodies that matter: on the discursive limitations of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Deaux K, Major B. Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review 1987;94:369–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Uitgeverij 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ine Vanwesenbeeck
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutgers Nisso Groep (RNG), Kenniscentrum Seksualiteit, UtrechtUtrecht

Personalised recommendations