Advertisement

Seksuologie pp 437-463 | Cite as

19 Plegers van seksueel geweld

  • Wineke Smid
  • Daan van Beek
  • Dirk De Doncker
Part of the Quintessens book series (QUI)

Samenvatting

Zedenmisdrijven schokken de samenleving meer dan andere misdrijven, omdat de persoonlijke vrijheid en de lichamelijke en psychische integriteit van de slachtoffers – meestal vrouwen en kinderen – worden geschonden, soms met traumatische gevolgen (zie hoofdstuk 18)

Literatuur

  1. 1.
    Willis GM, Grace RC. The quality of community reintegration planning for child molesters: Effects on recidivism. Sex Abuse 2008;20:218–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Logan C. Sexual deviance in females: Psychopathology and theory. In: Laws DR, O’Donohue WT, editors. Sexual deviance. Theory, assessment, and treatment. New York: Guilford Press, 2008:486–507.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kool R. Strafbare seksualiteit. In: Van Wijk APh, Bullens RA, Van den Eshof P, redactie. Facetten van zedencriminaliteit. Den Haag: Elsevier, 2007:99–124.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tubex H. De juridische en strafrechtelijke bemoeienis met plegers van seksueel geweld/misbruik: Een overzicht van de Belgische en Nederlandse situatie. T Seksuol 2002;26:105–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brouwers M, Smit PR. Seksuele delinquentie door de jaren heen. Justitiële Verkenningen 2005;1:37–47.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frenken J. Strafbare seksualiteit en seksueel deviant gedrag: Definities en prevalenties. T Seksuol 2002; 26:4–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mali B. Geregistreerde zedencriminaliteit in Nederland. In: Van Wijk APh, Bullens RA, Van den Eshof P, redactie. Facetten van zedencriminaliteit. Den Haag: Elsevier, 2007:71–97.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaarverslag Openbaar Ministerie 2000. Voorlichtingsdienst Openbaar Ministerie, Den Haag, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leuw E, Bijl RV, Daalder A. Pedoseksuele delinquentie. Een onderzoek naar prevalentie, toedracht en strafrechtelijke interventies. Meppel: Boom Juridische Uitgaven, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hendriks J. Jeugdige zedendelinquenten: een studie naar subtypen en recidive. Academisch proefschrift. Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam. Utrecht: Forum Educatief, 2006.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ward T, Polaschek DLL, Beech AR. Theories of sexual offending. New York: Wiley, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malamuth NM. Criminal and noncriminal sexual aggressors: Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchical mediational confluence model. In: Prentky RA, Janus ES, Seto MC, editors. Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management. New York: Ann N-Y Acad Sci 2003;989:33–58.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marshall WL, Barbaree HE. An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In: Marshall WL, Laws DR, Barbaree HE, editors. Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum Press, 1990:257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malamuth NM, Huppin M, Paul B. Sexual coercion. In: Buss DM, editor. The handbook of evolutionary psychology. New York: Wiley, 2005:394–418.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of Attachment: A psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marshall WL, Marshall LE. The origins of sexual offending. Trauma Violence Abuse 2000;1:250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smallbone SW. An attachment-theoretical revision of Marshall and Barbaree’s integrated theory of sexual offending. In: Marshall WL, Fernandez YM, Marshall LE, Serran GA, editors. Sexual Offender treatment: Controversial issues. Chicester: John Wiley Sons, 2006:93–108.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rich P. Attachment and sexual offending. Chichester: John Wiley Sons, 2006.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Beek DJ, Mulder J. De rol van cognitieve vervormingen in het plegen van pedoseksuele delicten en hun plaats in de behandeling. Seksuol 2002;26: 79–86.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Polaschek DLL, Ward T. The implicit theories of potential rapist:. What our questionnaires tell us. Aggressive and Violent Behavior 2002;7:385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hanson RK, Morton KE, Harris AJR. Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. In: Prentky RA, Janus ES, Seto MC, editors. Sexually Coercive Behavior: Understanding and Management. New York: Ann N-Y Acad Sci 2003;989:154–66.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Malamuth NM, Haber S, Feshbach S. Testing hypotheses regarding rape: Exposure to sexual violence, sex differences, and the ‘normality’ of rapists. J Res Pers 1980;14:121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blanchard R, Cantor JM, Robichaud LK. Biological factors in the development of sexual deviance and aggression in males. In: Barbaree HE, Marshall WL, editors. The juvenile sex offender. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2006:77–104.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jespersen AF, Lalumière ML, Seto MC. Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Child Abuse Negl 2009; 33:179–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kreuger RB, Kaplan MS. Disorders of impulse control in neuropsychiatric condition. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 2000;5:266–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Studer LH, Aylwin AS, Reddon JR. Testosterone, sexual offense recidivism, and treatment effect among adult male sex offenders. Sex Abuse 2005;17: 171–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schiltz K, Witzel J, Northoff G, et al. Brain pathology in pedophilic offenders: evidence of volume reduction in the right amygdala and related diencephalic structures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:737–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cantor JM, Kabani N, Christensen BK, et al. Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men. J Psychiatric Res 2008;42:167–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walter M, Witzel J, Wiebking C, et al. Pedophilia is Linked to reduced activation in hypothalamus and lateral prefrontal cortex during visual erotic stimulation. Biol Psychiatry 2007;62:698–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Teicher MH, Andersen SL, Polcari A, et al. The neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2003; 27:33–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Creeden K. The neurodevelopmental impact of early trauma and insecure attachment: Rethinking our understanding and treatment of sexual behavior problems. Sexual Addiction Compulsivity 2004;11: 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Knight RA, Sims-Knight JE. Testing an etiological model for male juvenile sexual offending against females. J Child Sex Abuse 2004;13:33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Beek DJ, Mulder JR. Het zelfregulatiemodel in delictroutes. Utrecht: Forum Educatief, 2007. (Nederlandse bewerking van: Ward T, et al. The Self-Regulationmodel of the offense and relapse process. Victoria (Ca): Pacific Psychological Assessment Cooperation, 2004.)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Van Beek DJ. De delictscenarioprocedure bij seksueel agressieve delinquenten: Een onderzoek naar de bruikbaarheid van de delictscenarioprocedure in de behandeling van seksueel agressieve delinquenten in de Dr. Henri van der Hoeven Kliniek. Proefschrift Universiteit Amsterdam. Arnhem: Gouda Quint XI, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bickley J, Beech AR. An empirical investigation of the Ward and Hudson selfregulation model of the sexual offence process with child abusers. J Interpers Violence 2002;17:371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Webster SD. Pathways to sexual offence recidivism following treatment: An examination of the Ward and Hudson self-regulation model of relapse. J Interpers Violence 2005;20:1175–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Koeck S, Van Beek DJ, De Doncker D. Classificatie van pedoseksuelen en verkrachters. T Seksuol 2002; 26:37–45.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ward T, Sorbello L. Explaining child sexual abuse. In: Ward T, Laws DR, Hudson SM, editors. Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Polaschek DLL, Hudson SM, Ward T, Siegert RJ. Rapists’ offense processes: A preliminary descriptive model. J Interpers Violence 2001;16:523–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Knight RA, Prentky RA. Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In: Marshall WL, Laws DR, Barbaree HE, editors. Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum Press, 1990:23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Koeck S, De Doncker D, Huys W, Winter J. Classificatie van extrafamiliale Pedoseksuelen. Deel II: SCEP-1. Het MTC:CM3 systeem herbekeken. T Seksuol 2006;30:75–90.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Knight RA, Guay J. The role of psychopathy in sexual coercion against women. In: Patrick CJ, editor. Handbook of psychopathy. New York: The Guilford Press, 2006:512–32.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hare RD. Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist. Toronto: Multi-Health Sysytems, 1991.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Craig LA, Browne KD, Beech AR. Assessing risk in sex offenders. A practioner guide. New York: Wiley, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hanson RK, Thornton D. Improving risk assessments fors ex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law Hum Behav 2000;24:119–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hildebrand M, De Ruiter C, Van Beek DJ. SVR-20: Richtlijnen voor het beoordelen van het risico van seksueel gewelddadig gedrag. Utrecht: Forum Educatief, 2001. (Nederlandse bewerking van: Boer DP, et al. Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20). Victoria (Ca): Pacific Psychological Assessment Cooperation. 1997.)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vogel V, De Ruiter C, Van Beek DJ, Mead G. Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and STATIC-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law Hum Behav 2004;28:235–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier CA. Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Webster S, Mann R, Carter A, et al. Inter-rater reliability of dynamic risk assessment with sexual offenders. Psychol Crime Law 2006;12:439–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hanson RK, Harris AJR, Scott TL, Helmus L. Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. (User report 2007–05). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada, 2007.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kalmus E, Beech AR. Forensic assessment of sexual interest: A review. Aggress Violent Behav 2005;10: 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    De Ruiter C, Hildebrand M. Behandelingsstrategieën bij forensisch psychiatrische patiënten. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 1999.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Roberts CF, Doren DM, Thornton D. Dimensions associated with assessment of sex offender recidivism risk. Crim Justice Behav 2002;29:569–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada, 2007.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Doren DM. Diagnostic issuses within sex offender civil commitment assessments: Defining relevant paraphilias. In: Doren DM, editor. Evaluating Sex Offenders: A Manual for Civil Commitments and Beyond. Londen: Sage Publications, 2002:51–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    First MB, Frances A. Issuses for DSM-V: Unintended consequences of small changes: The case of paraphilias. Am J Psychiatry 2008;165:1240–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hanson RK, Busiere MT. Predicting relapse: A metaanalysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998;66:348–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Abel GG, Jordan A, Rouleau JL, Emerick R, Barboza-Whitehead S, Osborn C. Use of reaction time to assess male adolescents who molest children. Sex Abuse, 2004;16:255–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rice ME, Harris GT. Cross-validation and extension of the violence risk appraisal guide for child molesters and rapists. Law Hum Behav 1997;21:231–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Olver ME, Wong SCP. Psychopathy, sexual deviance, and recidivism among sex offenders. Sex Abuse 2006;18:65–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    De Ruiter C, Hildebrand, M. De PCL-R in Nederland: De voorbarige conclusies van Spreen, Ter Horst, Lutjenhuis en Brand (2008). De Psycholoog 2008, 43–6, 345–49.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bull R, Baron H, Gudjonsson G, Hampson S, Rippon G, Vrij A. A review of the current scientific status and fields of application of polygraphic deception detection. London: British Psychological Society, 2004.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gannon TA, Beech AR, Ward T. Does the polygraph lead to better risk prediction for sexual offenders. Aggress Violent Behav 2008;13:29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Van Beek DJ. ‘What works’ principes in de behandeling van pedoseksuelen In: Oei TI, Groenhuijsen MS, redactie. Capita Selecta van de Forensische Psychiatrie anno 2006. Deventer: Kluwer, 2006:543–57.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hanson RK, Harris AJR. A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sex Abuse 2001;13:105–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ware J, Mann RE, Wakening HC. What is the best modality for treating sexual offenders. In press.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ward T, Steward CA. Good lives and rehabilitation of sex offenders. In: Ward T, Laws RD, Hudson SM, editors. Sexual deviance: issues and controversies. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003:21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Marshall WL, Serran GA, Fernandez YM. Therapist characteristics in the treatment of sexual offenders: Tentative data on their relationship with indices of behavior change. J Sex Aggress 2003;9:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wong SCP, Hare RD. Guidelines for a Psychopathy Treatment Program. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc, 2005.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Marshall WL, Marshall LE, Serran GA, Fernandez YM. Treating sexual offenders: An integral approach. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Harris GT, Rice ME. Treatment of psychopathy: A review of empirical findings. In: Patrick CJ, editor. Handbook of psychopathy. New York: The Guilford Press, 2006:555–72.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bourget D, Bradford JMW. Evidential Basis for the Assessment and Treatment of Sex Offenders. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 2008;8:130–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hill A, Briken P, Kraus C, Strohm K, et al. Differential pharmacological treatment of paraphilias and sex offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 2003;47:407–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Troelstra JA, Kossen M, Helmms NGH (red.). Forensisch psychofarmacologisch formularium van de Forensisch Pshychiatrische Centra Nederland. Utrecht: Van der Hoevenstichting, 2009.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Van Beek DJ, Kröger U. The Treatment of Psychopathic Patients in the Netherlands. In: Felthous AR, Sass H, editors. The International Handbook of Psychopathic Disorders and the Law, volume II, Laws and Policies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley Sons, Ltd, 2007:407–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Uitgeverij 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wineke Smid
    • 1
  • Daan van Beek
    • 2
  • Dirk De Doncker
    • 3
  1. 1.faculteit maatschappij en gedragswetenschappen, vakgroep klinische psychologieUniversiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdam
  2. 2.hoofd Afdeling Psychotherapie Dr. Henri van der Hoeven Stichting, UtrechtUtrecht
  3. 3.Universitair Ziekenhuis, AntwerpenAntwerpen

Personalised recommendations