Advertisement

23 Experimentele studies naar schema’s

  • S.H. Sieswerda

Samenvatting

Na een schematherapie (ST) voor borderline persoonlijkheidsstoornis volgens Young (Young, Klosko & Weishaar, 2003) blijken de klachten van ongeveer de helft van de patiënten niet meer aan de criteria van een persoonlijkheidsstoornis te voldoen (Giesen-Bloo et al., 2006). ST volgens Beck inclusief behandeling van traumatische jeugdervaringen bij andere persoonlijkheidsstoornissen laat eveneens grote effecten zien (Weertman & Arntz, 2007).

Literatuur

  1. Arntz, A., Appels, C., & Sieswerda, S. (2000). Hypervigilance in borderline disorder: A test with the emotional Stroop paradigm. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 366–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arntz, A., & Veen, G. (2001). Evaluation of others by borderline patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 513–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, A.T., Freeman, A., & Davis, D.D. (2004). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders (second edition). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dreessen, L., Arntz, A., Hendriks, T., Keune, N., & Hout, M.A. van den (1999). Avoidant personality disorder and schema-congruent information processing bias: a pilot study with a pragmatic inference task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 619–632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giesen-Bloo, J., Dyck, R. van, Spinhoven, Ph., Tilburg, W. van, Dirksen, C., Asselt, T. van, Kremers, I., Nadort, M., & Arntz, A. (2006). Outpatient psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder, randomized trial of Schema-Focused Therapy vs Transference Focused Psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 649–658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haaf, J.E. ten, & Arntz, A. (aangeboden voor publicatie). Social cognition in borderline personality disorder: Evidence for dichotomous thinking but no evidence for primitive attributions.Google Scholar
  7. Kroll, J. (1988). The challenge of the borderline patient. New York/London: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Layden, M.A., Newman, C.F., Freeman, A., & Morse, S.B. (1993). Cognitive therapy of borderline personality disorder. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  9. Pretzer, J. (1990). Borderline personality disorder. In: A.T. Beck, A. Freeman & Associates (Eds.), Cognitive therapy of personality disorders (p. 176–207). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Sabo, A.N. (1997). Etiological significance of associations between childhood trauma and borderline personality disorder: conceptual and clinical implications. Journal of Personality Disorders, 11, 50–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sieswerda, S., & Arntz, A. (aangeboden voor publicatie). Change of extreme and negative interpersonal evaluations of borderline patients during psychotherapy.Google Scholar
  12. Sieswerda, S., Arntz, A., & Kindt, M. (2007a). Successful psychotherapy reduces hypervigilance in Borderline Personality Disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sieswerda, S., Arntz, A., Mertens, I., & Vertommen, S. (2007b). Hypervigilance in patients with borderline personality disorder: Specificity, automaticity, and predictors. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1011–1024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sieswerda, S., Arntz, A., & Verheul, R. (aangeboden voor publicatie). Not dichotomous, but negative interpersonal evaluations characterize borderline patients.Google Scholar
  15. Sieswerda, S., Arntz, A., & Wolfis, M. (2005). Evaluations of emotional non-interpersonal situations by patients with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36, 209–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Veen, G., & Arntz, A. (2000). Multidimensional dichotomous thinking characterizes borderline personality disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Waller, G., & Button, J. (2002). Processing of threat cues in borderline personality disorder. Niet gepubliceerd.Google Scholar
  18. Weertman, A., & Arntz, A. (2007). Effectiveness of treatment of childhood memories in cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A controlled study contrasting methods focusing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2133–2143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weertman, A., Arntz, A., Jong, P.J. de, & Rinck, M. (in druk). Implicit self- and otherassociations in obsessive-compulsive personality disorder traits. Cognition and Emotion.Google Scholar
  20. Weertman, A., Arntz, A., Salet, S., & Coenen, I. (2006). Obsessive compulsive personality disorder and interpretation of schema-related events. In: A. Weertman, The cognitive model of personality disorders. Academisch proefschrift. Universiteit Maastricht.Google Scholar
  21. Weertman, A., Arntz, A., Schouten, E., & Dreessen, L. (2006). Dependent personality traits and information processing: assessing the interpretation of ambiguous information using the Thematic Apperception Test. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 273–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Westen, D. (1990). Towards a revised theory of borderline object relations: contributions of empirical research. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 661–693.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, J.M.G., Watts, F.N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (second edition). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  24. Young, J.E., Klosko, J., & Weishaar, M.E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Uitgeverij 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S.H. Sieswerda

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations