Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

11 Disposables of reusables bij endoscopische ingrepen

  • Chapter
Handboek endoscopische chirurgie

  • 1450 Accesses

Samenvatting

Gedurende endoscopische chirurgie wordt een verscheidenheid aan instrumentarium gebruikt. Bij dergelijke ingrepen hebben ziekenhuizen de keuze uit disposable en reusable instrumenten. Reusables zijn hergebruikbaar (Multi Patient Use) en vergen daarom een reinigings- en sterilisatiecyclus, terwijl disposables bedoeld zijn voor eenmalig gebruik en dus na gebruik verwijderd worden (Single Patient Use). De uitkomst van de keuze tussen disposables en reusables kan invloed hebben op de financiering en het verloop van de operatieve procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  1. Weatherly KS, Young SW. Reusable laparoscopic instrument systems: An analysis of quality and cost issues. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994;4(2):135–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Straetmans MJG. Disposable versus reusable instrumentarium bij laparoscopische cholecystectomie; een analyse van kosten en effecten in het Groene Hart Ziekenhuis te Gouda en het Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DesCoteaux J, Poulin E, Julien M, et al. Residual organic debris on processed surgical instruments. AORN J 62(1):23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaufour X, Deva AK, Vickery K, Zou J, Kumaradeva P, White GH, et al. Evaluation of disinfection and sterilization of reusable angioscopes with the duck hepatitis B model. J Vasc Surg 1999;30(2):277–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fengler TW, Pahlke H, Bisson S, Kraas E. The clinical suitability of laparoscopic instrumentation. A prospective clinical study of function and hygiene. Surg Endosc 2000;14(4):388–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fengler TW, Pahlke H, Kraas E. Sterile and economic instrumentation in laparoscopic surgery. Experiences with 6,000 surgical laparoscopies, 1990-1996. Surg Endosc 1998;12(10):1275–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malchesky PS, Chamberlain VC, Scott Conner C, Salis B, Wallace C. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices. ASAIO J. 1995;41(2):146–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muscarella LF. Instrument design and cross-infection. AORN J 1998;67(3):552-3, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reichert M. Laparoscopic instruments. Patient care, cost issues. AORN J 1993;57(3):637–55.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dinakaran S, Kayarkar VV. Debris on processed ophthalmic instruments: a cause for concern. Eye 2002;16(3):281–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon SJ. Reusable versus disposable forceps: the dilemma of cost and safety. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51(3):363–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raltz SL, Kozarek RA. Overview of the problem: reprocessing versus disposal of endoscopic accessories. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2000;10(2):329–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rizzo J, Bernstein D, Gress F. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51(3):257–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiba M, Higuchi K, Fujiwara Y, Tominaga K, Watanabe T, Itani A, et al. Risk associated with reprocessed reusable endoscopic instruments. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96(12):3465–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spach DH, Silverstein FE, Stamm WE. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Ann Intern Med 1993;118(2):117–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tytgat GN. Endoscopic transmission of Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1995;9 Suppl 2:105–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. MacFadyen BV, Lenz S. The economic considerations in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1994;8(7):748–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. MarketResponse. Rapport Endoscopisch instrumentarium Leusden: MarketResponse Nederland BV, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang R, Ng S, Nichol M, Laine L. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51(3):266–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eubanks S, Newman L, Lucas G. Reduction of HIV transmission during laparoscopic procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993;3(1):2–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelty CJ, Super PA, Stoddard CJ. The driving force in trocar insertion: a comparison between disposable and reusable trocars. Surg Endosc 2000;14(11):1045–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yuzpe AA. Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy. A survey on possible contributing factors and prevention. J Reprod Med 1990;35(5):485–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Demoulin L, Kesteloot K, Penninckx F. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1996;10(5):520–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Swem T, Fazzalari R. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1995;3(2-3):129–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weatherly KS, Kenwood L, Hlusko DL, Franklin KG. Product evaluation process. A systems approach to controlling health care costs. AORN J 1994;59(2):489–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. VieCuri Medisch Centrum voor Noord-Limburg, Venlo

    Mevr. drs. D.E.N.M. de Hoog (Arts-assistent chirurgie)

  2. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam

    Drs. M.J.G. Straetmans (Student-onderzoeker)

  3. Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, Maastricht

    Dr. N.D. Bouvy (Chirurg)

Authors
  1. Mevr. drs. D.E.N.M. de Hoog
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Drs. M.J.G. Straetmans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dr. N.D. Bouvy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort en Universiteit Twente, Technische Geneeskunde, Twente

    Ivo A.M.J. Broeders (Chirurg, Hoogleraar robotica en minimaal invasieve interventies) (Chirurg, Hoogleraar robotica en minimaal invasieve interventies)

  2. TNO Industrie en Techniek, Delft

    Sandy S. Kalisingh MSc (Business Development Manager Medical & Health) (Business Development Manager Medical & Health)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, onderdeel van Springer Uitgeverij

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Hoog, D., Straetmans, M., Bouvy, N. (2009). 11 Disposables of reusables bij endoscopische ingrepen. In: Broeders, I., Kalisingh, S.S. (eds) Handboek endoscopische chirurgie. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6559-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6559-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-313-5082-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-313-6559-3

  • eBook Packages: Dutch language eBook collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation