Skip to main content

11 Meta-etnografie en de synthese van kwalitatief onderzoek

  • Chapter
Kwalitatief onderzoek

Part of the book series: Huisarts en Wetenschap ((HEW))

Samenvatting

In dit hoofdstuk staat de synthese van kwalitatief onderzoek centraal. Om evidence-based beslissingen te nemen in de gezondheidszorg, vooral bij complexe zorgvragen, wordt in toenemende mate een beroep gedaan op evidence uit kwalitatief onderzoek. De confrontatie met het groeiend aantal kwalitatieve studies verplicht de gebruiker om op een kritische wijze deze informatie samen te vatten. Dit ‘samenvatten’ is de kern van dit hoofdstuk.

Science is cumulative, and scientists must cumulate scientifically!1

Sir Iain Chalmers

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  1. Chalmers I, Hedges L, Cooper H. A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and the Health Professionals 2002;25:12-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Glass GV, Smith ML, McGaw B. Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, ca: Sage, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Glass GV. Meta-analysis at 25 (http://glass.ed.asu/gene/papers/meta25.html).

  4. Vermeire E. The study of research evidence synthesis, applied to adherence to treatment recommendations in people living with type 2 diabetes. Proefschrift. Antwerpen: University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davies Ph. The Magenta Book. Guidance notes for policy evaluation and analysis. Londen: Government Chie Social Researcher’s Office. Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. Cabinet Office, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M, Pill R. Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7(4):209-15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vermeire E. Synthese als permanente uitdaging (Editoriaal). Minerva 2003;2(3):38-9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research 1998;8(3):341-51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Research in Nursing and Health 1997;20(4):365-71.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, Jillings C. Meta-study of qualitative health research. A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analsysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (moose) group. jama 2000;283(15):2008-12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strike K, Posner G. Types of syntheses and their criteria. In: Ward S, Reed L, eds. Knowledge structure and use. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Qualitative research methods series 11. Newbury Park: Sage, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Morgan M, Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:671-84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oakley A. Applying systematic review methods to studies of people’s views: an example from public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:794-800.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dixon-Woods M, Olsen R, Annandal E, et al. Access to health care by vulnerable groups: A meta-ethnographic literature review (www.hs.le.ac.uk/research/qualquan/sdosummary.htm).

  17. Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Roberts K, et al. A structured review and meta-ethnography of qualitative and quantitative evidence in patient satisfaction in primary care (www.hs.le.ac.uk/research/qualquan/patientsatisfaction.htm).

  18. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci med 2005;61(2):417-30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krueger RA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, ca: Sage Publications, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vermeire E, Van Royen P, Coenen S, Wens J, Denekens J. The adherence of type 2 diabetes patients to their therapeutic regimens: a qualitative study from the patient’s perspective. Pract Diab Int 2003;20(6):209-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I (eds). A companion to qualitative research. Londen: Sage Publications, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. European General Practice Research Network http://www.egprn.org

  24. Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group (http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/Cochrane_Qual_Method/convenors.htm

Download references

Authors

Editor information

P.L.B.J. Lucassen T.C. olde Hartman

Copyright information

© 2007 Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vermeire, E. (2007). 11 Meta-etnografie en de synthese van kwalitatief onderzoek. In: Lucassen, P., Hartman, T.o. (eds) Kwalitatief onderzoek. Huisarts en Wetenschap. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6373-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-6373-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, Houten

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-313-4998-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-313-6373-5

  • eBook Packages: Dutch language eBook collection

Publish with us

Policies and ethics