Abstract
Critically ill patients can be considered not only patients with one or more impaired vital functions but also patients with any severe chronic disease impairing vital signs. The choice of veins is crucial in those patients because their veins’ patrimony could already be poor because of previous therapies and the need for a central venous line could be the only solution.
The use of peripheral deep veins in the arm for PICC insertion was rediscovered in the last 20 years with the introduction of ultrasound guidance and the use of new materials such as very flexible and power-injectable polyurethanes and the use of nitinol guide wires.
An ultrasound examination of those veins should be performed in order to assess their patency with the compressive ultrasound two-dimensional technique or with the Doppler technique in case of doubts.
The choice of the vein in which to insert a PICC line should be guided by cross-sectional diameter of the vein, vein depth, catheter/vein ratio, and exit site. Those parameters together with a proper indication for a PICC line should be followed according to an algorithm for any patient requiring long-term therapy avoiding the risk of a traditional central line insertion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F et al (2001) Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 286:700–707
McGee DC, Gould MK (2003) Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 348:1123–1133
American College of Emergency Physicians policy statement: emergency ultrasound guidelines. American College of Emergency Physicians Web site. Available at: http://www.acep.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=32878. Accessed 15th Oct 2013
Marsh R, Campbell N (2007) Drum cartridge catheter. Anaesthesia 40:604
Neuman M, Murphy B, Rosen M (2006) Bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 206:424–428
Galloway M (2010) Insertion and placement of central catheters in the oncology patient. Semin Oncol Nurs 26:102–112
Tariq M, Huang D (2006) PICCing the best access for your patient. Crit Care 10:315
Selis J, Kadakia S (2009) Venous Doppler sonography of the extremities: a window to pathology of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1446–1451
Muñoz F, Mismetti P, Poggio R et al (2008) Clinical outcome of patients with upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: results from the RIETE Registry. Chest 133:143
Kucher N (2011) Clinical practice. Deep-vein thrombosis of the upper extremities. N Engl J Med 364:861
Owens C, Bui J, Knuttinen M, Gaba R et al (2010) Pulmonary embolism from upper extremity deep vein thrombosis and the role of superior vena cava filters: a review of the literature. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:779
Hirsh J, Cogo A, Lensing A et al (1993) Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Implications for simplifying the diagnostic process with compression ultrasound. JAMA 153:2777–2780
Elliott CG (2000) The diagnostic approach to deep venous thrombosis: diagnostic tests for deep vein thrombosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 21:6
Lensing A, Jongbloets L, Koopman M et al (1994) Limitations of compression ultrasound for the detection of symptomless postoperative deep vein thrombosis. Lancet 343:1142–1144
Bleichrodt H, Quiggin J (1999) Life-cycle preferences over consumption and health: when is cost-effectiveness analysis equivalent to cost-benefit analysis? J Health Econ 18:681–708
Gold MR et al (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford, p 18
Black W (2000) A graphical representation of cost-effectiveness. Med Decis Making 10:212–214
Infusion Nurses Society (2006) Infusion nursing standard of practice. J Infus Nurs 29(suppl1):S1–S92
Nifong T, McDevitt T (2011) The effect of catheter to vein ratio on blood flow rates in a simulated model of peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Chest 140:48–53
Dawson R (2011) PICC Zone Insertion Method (ZIM): a systematic approach to determine the ideal insertion site for PICCs in the upper arm. J Assoc Vasc Access 16:156–165
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lamperti, M. (2014). The Choice of a Vein in Critically Ill Patients: Cost-Effectiveness. In: Sandrucci, S., Mussa, B. (eds) Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5665-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5665-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5664-0
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5665-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)