Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSPOLIMI))

  • 1619 Accesses

Abstract

The traditional approach to Project Management focuses on the stability of the project plan as a critical success factor. However the increasing level of complexity and uncertainty in the business context requires a high level of adaptability to changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • I. Ansoff, Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. Calif. Manage. Rev. 18(2), 21–33 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Artto, J. Kujala, P. Dietrich, M. Martinsuo, What is project strategy. Int. J. Project Manage. 26, 4–12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Artto, M. Lehtonen, K. Aaltonen, P. Aaltonen, J. Kujala,S. Lindemann, M. Murtonen M., Two types of project strategy–empirical illustrations in project risk management, IRNOP IX, October 2009 (Berlin, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • E.S. Bernardes, M.D. Hanna, A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 29(1), 30–53 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.J. Kolltveit, J.T. Karlsen, K. Gronhaug. Exploiting opportunities in uncertainty during the early project phase. J. Manage. Eng. (2004). ASCE

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Davidson, Is probability theory relevant for uncertainty? A post Keynesian perspective. J. Econ. Perspect. 5(1), 129–143 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Floricel, R. Miller, Strategizing for anticipated risks and turbulence in large scale engineering projects. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 19, 445–455 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.N. Ford, S. Bhargav, Project management quality and the value of flexible strategies. Eng. Constr. Architectural Manage. 23(3), 275–289 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Geraldi, L. Lee-Kelley, E. Kutsch, The balance between order and chaos in multi project firms: A conceptual model. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 28, 547–558 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Hellstrom, K. Wikstrom, Project business concepts based on modularity—improved manouevrability through unstable structures. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 23, 392–397 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Loosemore, Managing project risks, in The management of complex projects: A relationship approach, ed. by S. Pryke, H. Smyth (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Miller, D. Lessard, The strategic management of large engineering projects, shaping institutions, risks and governance (MIT, Cambridge, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • P.W.G. Morris, A. Jamieson, Moving from corporate strategy project strategy. Proj. Manage. J. 36(4), 5–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • N.O.E. Olsson, Management of flexibility in projects. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 24, 66–74 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.O.E. Olsson, External and internal flexibility—aligning projects with the business strategy and executing projects efficiently. Int. J. Proj. Organ. Manage. 1(1), 47–64 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • N.O.E. Olsson, O.M. Magnussen, Flexibility at different stages in the life cycle of projects: An empirical illustration of the freedom to maneuver. Proj. Manage. J. 38(4), 25–32 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.M. Ross, D.H. Rhodes, D.E. Hastings, Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value. Syst. Eng. 11(3), 246–262 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.P. Schulz, E. Fricke, Incorporating flexibility, agility, robustness and adaptability within the design of integrated systems—key to success? Digit. Avionics Syst. Conf. 1, 1–17 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franco Caron .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caron, F. (2013). Robustness and Flexibility. In: Managing the Continuum: Certainty, Uncertainty, Unpredictability in Large Engineering Projects. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5244-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5244-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5243-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5244-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics