Skip to main content

Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Laparoscopy and New Minimally Invasive Techniques

  • Chapter
Ulcerative Colitis

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

  • 1281 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al; MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group; Nelson H, Sargent DJ et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 350(20):2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(3):CD003145

    Google Scholar 

  4. Targownik LE, Singh H, Nugent Z, Bernstein CN (2012) The epidemiology of colectomy in ulcerative colitis: results from a population-based cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 107(8):1228–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Filippi J, Allen PB, Hébuterne X, Peyrin-Biroulet L (2011) Does anti-TNF therapy reduce the requirement for surgery in ulcerative colitis? A systematic review. Curr Drug Targets 12(10):1440–1447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmed Ali U, Keus F, Heikens JT et al (2009) Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009(1):CD006267

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fleming FJ, Francone TD, Kim MJ et al (2011) A laparoscopic approach does reduce short-term complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 54(2):176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartels SA, D’Hoore A, Cuesta MA et al (2012) Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 256(6): 1045–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L, Birnbaum D et al (2013) A total laparoscopic approach reduces the infertility rate after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a 2-center study. Ann Surg 258(2):275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Øresland T, Bemelman WA, Sampietro GM et al; European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) (2015) European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 9(1):4–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg 241(2):262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rencuzogullari A, Stocchi L, Costedio M et al (2017) Characteristics of learning curve in minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in a single institution. Surg Endosc 31(3):1083–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kiely JM, Fazio VW, Remzi FH et al (2012) Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 55(4):387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gu J, Stocchi L, Remzi FH, Kiran RP (2014) Total abdominal colectomy for severe ulcerative colitis: does the laparoscopic approach really have benefit? Surg Endosc 28(2): 617–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Causey MW, Stoddard D, Johnson EK et al (2013) Laparoscopy impacts outcomes favorably following colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a critical analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 27(2):603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenstein AJ, Romanoff AM, Moskowitz AJ et al (2013) Payer status and access to laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 56(9):1062–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fajardo AD, Dharmarajan S, George V et al (2010) Laparoscopic versus open 2-stage ileal pouch: laparoscopic approach allows for faster restoration of intestinal continuity. J Am Coll Surg 211(3):377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bartels SA, Gardenbroek TJ, Ubbink DT et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open colectomy with end ileostomy for non-toxic colitis. Br J Surg 100(6):726–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro R, Vogel JD, Kiran RP (2011) Risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: an additional benefit of the minimally invasive approach? Dis Colon Rectum 54(12):1496–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stocchi L (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 23(4):248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rottoli M, Vallicelli C, Gionchetti P et al (2018) Transabdominal salvage surgery after pouch failure in a tertiary center: a case-matched study. Dig Liver Dis 50(5):446–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rottoli M, Vallicelli C, Bigonzi E et al (2018) Prepouch ileitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: patterns of presentation and risk factors for failure of treatment. J Crohns Colitis 12(3):273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brady RR, Collie MH, Ho GT et al (2008) Outcomes of the rectal remnant following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 10(2):144–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Longo WE (2013) The out-of-circuit rectum in ulcerative colitis: the bumpy road less traveled: comment on “Fate of rectal stump after subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis in the era of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis”. JAMA Surg 148(5):412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buchs NC, Mortensen NJ, Guy RJ, George BD (2016) Persistent colitis after emergency laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a cautionary note. Colorectal Dis 18(1):106–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gu J, Stocchi L, Remzi F, Kiran RP (2013) Intraperitoneal or subcutaneous: does location of the (colo)rectal stump influence outcomes after laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy for ulcerative colitis? Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):615–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karch LA, Bauer JJ, Gorfine SR, Gelernt IM et al (1995) Subtotal colectomy with Hartmann’s pouch for inflammatory bowel disease. Dis Colon Rectum 38(6):635–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A et al (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(7):703–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S et al; TaTME Registry Collaborative (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266(1):111–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tasende MM, Delgado S, Jimenez M et al (2015) Minimal invasive surgery: NOSE and NOTES in ulcerative colitis. Surg Endosc 29(11):3313–3318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liyanage C, Ramwell A, Harris GJ et al (2013) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a new technique for completion proctectomy. Colorectal Dis 15(9):e542–e547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. de Buck van Overstraeten A, Mark-Christensen A, Wasmann KA et al (2017) Transanal versus transabdominal minimally invasive (completion) proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: a comparative study. Ann Surg 266(5):878–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pedraza R, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Haas EM (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 20(4):234–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McLemore EC, Cullen J, Horgan S et al (2012) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic stage II restorative proctectomy for toxic ulcerative colitis. Int J Med Robot 8(2):178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller AT, Berian JR, Rubin M et al (2012) Robotic-assisted proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched comparison of laparoscopic and robotic technique. J Gastrointest Surg 16(3):587–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rencuzogullari A, Gorgun E, Costedio M et al (2016) Case-matched comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26(3):e37–e40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Rottoli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poggioli, G., Rottoli, M. (2019). Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Laparoscopy and New Minimally Invasive Techniques. In: Poggioli, G. (eds) Ulcerative Colitis. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3977-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3977-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-3976-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-3977-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics