Skip to main content

Simulation in Laparoscopy and Robotics

  • Chapter
  • 895 Accesses

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gallagher AG, O’Sullivan GC (2012) Fundamentals of surgical simulation. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ritter EM, McClusky DA 3rd, Gallagher AG et al (2006) Perceptual, visuospatial, and psychomotor abilities correlate with duration of training required on a virtual-reality flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg 192(3):379–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallagher AG, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16(12): 1746–1752

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Satava RM (1993) Virtual reality surgical simulator: the first steps. Surg Endosc 7(3):203–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H et al (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241(2):364–372

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Seymour NE (2008) VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 32(2): 182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236(4):458–463

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, Baghai M et al (2008) Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of curriculum-based training for intracorporeal suturing and knot tying. J Am Coll Surg 207(4): 560–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J et al (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91(2): 146–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Healy GB (2002) The college should be instrumental in adapting simulators to education. Bull Am Coll Surg 87(11): 10–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG et al (2007) Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Am J Surg 193(6):797–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Orzech N, Palter VN, Reznick RK et al (2012) A comparison of 2 ex vivo training curricula for advanced laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 255(5):833–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beyer-Berjot L, Palter V, Grantcharov T, Aggarwal R (2014) Advanced training in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 156(3):676–688

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Roscoe SN (1971) Incremental transfer effectiveness. Human Factors 13(6):561–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L et al (2016) A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Eur Urol 69(6): 1065–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Culligan P, Gurshumov E, Lewis C et al (2014) Predictive validity of a training protocol using a robotic surgery simulator. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 20(1):48–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hogg ME, Tam V, Zenati M et al (2016) Mastery-based virtual reality robotic simulation curriculum: the first step toward operative robotic proficiency. J Surg Educ 74(3):477–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rehman S, Raza SJ, Stegemann AP et al (2013) Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation. Int J Surg 11(9):841–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L et al (2014) Distribution of innate ability for surgery amongst medical students assessed by an advanced virtual reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 28(6): 1830–1837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Moglia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moglia, A. (2018). Simulation in Laparoscopy and Robotics. In: Boggi, U. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Pancreas. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3958-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3958-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-3957-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-3958-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics