Skip to main content

Evolving Technologies in the Operating Room for Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery

  • Chapter
Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Pancreas

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sørensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L, Bjerrum F (2016) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 30(1):11–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spille J, Wenners A, von Hehn U et al (2017) 2D versus 3D in laparoscopic surgery by beginners and experts: a randomized controlled trial on a pelvitrainer in objectively graded surgical steps. J Surg Educ [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Velayutham V, Fuks D, Nomi T et al (2016) 3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to high-definition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 30(1):147–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Subar D, Pietrasz D, Fuks D, Gayet B (2015) A novel technique for reducing pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticojejunostomy. J Surg Case Rep 2015(7):rjv074 doi:10.1093/jscr/rjv074

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kawaguchi Y, Velayutham V, Fuks D et al (2015) Usefulness of indocyanine green-fluorescence imaging for visualization of the bile duct during laparoscopic liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 221(6): e113–e117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuh B, Yu X, Raytis J et al (2016) Use of a mobile tower-based robot — The initial Xi robot experience in surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 113(1):5–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yuh B (2016) Response to letter to the editor on “Use of a mobile tower-based robot — The initial Xi robot experience in surgical oncology”. J Surg Oncol 114(8):1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Memeo R, Sangiuolo F, de Blasi V et al (2016) Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: state of the art. J Visc Surg 153(5):353–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun MR, Brennan DD, Kruskal JB, Kane RA (2010) Intraoperative ultrasonography of the pancreas. Radiographics 30(7):1935–1953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Piccolboni D, Ciccone F, Settembre A, Corcione F (2008) The role of echo-laparoscopy in abdominal surgery: five years’ experience in a dedicated center. Surg Endosc 22(1):112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Doucas H, Sutton CD, Zimmerman A et al (2007) Assessment of pancreatic malignancy with laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasound. Surg Endosc 21(7):1147–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pietrabissa A, Caramella D, Di Candio G et al (1999) Laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography for staging pancreatic cancer: critical appraisal. World J Surg 23(10):998–1002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao ZW, He JY, Tan G et al (2003) Laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography in judging the resectability of pancreatic head cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2(4):609–611

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marescaux J, Clément JM, Tassetti V et al (1998) Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann Surg 228(5):627–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I et al (2007) Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 246(5):771–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Araujo SE, Delaney CP, Seid VE et al (2014) Short-duration virtual reality simulation training positively impacts performance during laparoscopic colectomy in animal model: results of a single-blinded randomized trial: VR warm-up for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 28(9):2547–2554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagendran M, Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R et al (2013) Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD006575

    Google Scholar 

  19. Duran C, Estrada S, O’Malley M et al (2015) The model for Fundamentals of Endovascular Surgery (FEVS) successfully defines the competent endovascular surgeon. J Vasc Surg 62(6):1660–1666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uchida M (2014) Recent advances in 3D computed tomography techniques for simulation and navigation in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(4):239–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marescaux J, Rubino F, Arenas M et al (2004) Augmented-reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. JAMA 292(18):2214–2215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hostettler A, Nicolau SA, Rémond Y et al (2010) A real-time predictive simulation of abdominal viscera positions during quiet free breathing. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 103(2–3): 169–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pessaux P, Diana M, Soler L et al (2014) Robotic duodenopancreatectomy assisted with augmented reality and real-time fluorescence guidance. Surg Endosc 28(8):2493–2498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Forgione A, Guraya SY (2017) The cutting-edge training modalities and educational platforms for accredited surgical training: a systematic review. J Res Med Sci 22(1):51

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graziano Ceccarelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ceccarelli, G., Forgione, A., Andolfi, E., Rocca, A., Giuliani, A., Calise, F. (2018). Evolving Technologies in the Operating Room for Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery. In: Boggi, U. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Pancreas. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3958-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-3958-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-3957-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-3958-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics