Environmental Networks for Smart Territories



In this chapter, the concepts of environmental networks and territories are brought together. They are already dense with meaning individually, but we make adjectives of them and consider the added value that derives from their close geographical/conceptual connection. To carry out this reflection, we start from the case study of the Marche Regional Ecological Network (REM) for two reasons: first, considering the range of interpretations referring to this concept, by presenting a concrete case we can refer to a specific meaning, which we would like to reflect on without missing on an appropriate comparison to other approaches; the second reason is directed at the recovery of an experiential methodology that we often overlook in favor of abstractions. Unfortunately, in the field of governance, we have often seen what can sometime happen with apparently irrefutable theories, such that nothing positive is left in the territory if the comparison with concrete implementation at different levels of government is not controlled. The failures recorded in the history of landscape planning in countries such as Italy, which should focus its development policies on this extraordinary and strategic resource, are a warning we should not ignore: from the sharing of guidelines, programs, and master plans on the regional and national levels, it is difficult to proceed with identifying the effects of implementation on the provincial and community levels.


Environmental Network Smart City Landscape Plan Creative City Territorial Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2006) Green Infrastructure, Linking Landscapes and Communities. The Conservation Found. Island Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Parliament (2012). EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Disponibile su:
  3. 3.
    International 139 (2009) Landscape infrastructures. Editoriale Lotus, MilanGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lanzani A, Marini E (1993) Il territorio ehe cambia. Segesta, MilanGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clementi A (2008) Corridoi, piattaforme, città senza fine. Nuovi scenari per la città medioadriatica. List-Actar, Trento-BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Magnaghi A (1998) Territorialheritage: a genetic code for sustainable development. In: INURA (ed) Possible Urban Worlds: Urban Strategies at the End of the 20th Century. Birkhäuser, Basel/Boston/BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lanzani A (2003) Paesaggi italiani. Meltemi, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jakob M (2009) Il paesaggio. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gasparrini C (2012) Una nuova città: diffusione e densificazione. In: Sargolini M, Talia M (eds) Ri-conoscere e ri-progettare la città contemporanea. Franco Angeli, MilanGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams K, Burton E, Jenks M (2000) Achieving sustainable urban form, E&F SPON, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiria GM, Giovagnorio I (2012) The role of the city’s shape in urban sustainability. In: International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, volume 3, n. 3Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Forman R (1997) Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perrels P A (1994) Sustainable cities in Europe. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corbett J, Corbett M (2000) Designing sustainable communities: Learning from village homes. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams K, Burton E, Jenks M (2000) Achieving sustainable urban form: Conclusions. In: Achieving sustainable urban form. E & FN Spon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jabareen YR (2006) Sustainable Urban Forms: Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts. In Journal of Planning Education and Research, September, 2006 26: 38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steiner F (1994) Preface. In: Steiner F (ed) Costruire il paesaggio. McGraw-Hill, MilanGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zagrebelsky G (2008) Valori e diritti. In: La Repubblica, 22 February 2008Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Osti G (2010) Sociologia del territorio. Il Mulino Manuals, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Secchi B (2005) La città del ventesimo secolo. Laterza, Roma-BariGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clementi A (2012) Paesaggi di frontiere urbane. In: Sargolini M, Talia M (eds) Ri-conoscere e ri-progettare la città contemporanea. Franco Angeli, MilanGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Czerniak J, Hargreaves G (2007) Large parks. Princeton Architectural Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Secchi B (1995) Le condizioni generali. In: Casabella, 629Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Catucci S (2012) Postfazione. In: Morandi F, Niccolini F, Sargolini M (eds) Parks and territory. List-Actar, Trento-BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bordoni C (2009) Vivere in rete. L’individualismo dentro i social networks: Facebook e oltre. Prometeo, 106Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Castells M (2002) Galassia Internet. Feltrinelli, MilanGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chatwin B (1995) Le vie dei canti. Adelphi, MilanGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Auge M (2009) Nonluoghi. Introduzione a una antropologia délia surmodernità. Eleuthera, MilanGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bauman Z (2002) Modernità liquida. Laterza, Rme-BariGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gubert R (1987) Territorio. In: Demarchi F, Ellena A, Cattarinussi B (eds) Nuovo dizionario di sociologia. Paoline, MilanGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bauman Z (2000) La solitudine del cittadino globale. Feltrinelli, MilanGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CamerinoItaly

Personalised recommendations