Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Governo clinico e medicina perioperatoria pp 327–336Cite as

Conflitto di interessi: Considerazioni e raccomandazioni

  • Chapter

  • 461 Accesses

Riassunto

La medicina è una scienza polimorfa e complessa, strettamente connessa al vivere comune e alle istituzioni che la rappresentano. Queste relazioni riguardano sia la ricerca biomedica sia la medicina clinica, vale a dire la medicina che viene quotidianamente praticata negli ospedali e cliniche universitari [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Presidenza Del Consiglio Dei Ministri, Comitato Nazionale Per La Bioetica. Conflitti d’interessi nella ricerca biomedica e nella pratica clinica. Seduta Plenaria 8 Giugno 2006. http://www.governo.it/bioetica/testi/Conflitti_interessi.pdf

  2. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academy Press, Washington, p 23

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bodenheimer T (2000) Uneasy alliance — clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. N Engl J Med 342:1539–1544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavicchi I (2002) Il medico tra due conflitti: l’economia che determina e la società determinante. Ann Ital Med Int 17(Suppl 1):143–149

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tognoni G (2000) Conflitti tra finalità di ricerca e finalità di assistenza. L’Arco di Giano 23:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pera M (1989) Etica della conoscenza scientifica. Vol. 13. Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana, Roma, pp 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greco P, Malliani A, Bencivelli S (2005) Comprare e vendere in medicina. Janus 17:10–59

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bobbio M (2001) La neutralità della scienza: la situazione italiana. Ann Ital Med Int 16(Suppl 1):2155–2185

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bobbio M (2004) Giuro di esercitare la medicina in libertà e indipendenza. Einaudi, Torino, pp 50–63

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cavicchi I (2003) Implicazioni della neutralità tra scienza ed economia. Ital Med Int 18(Suppl 1):203–206

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dickersin K, Min YI, Neimert CL (1992) Factors influencing publication of research result. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. Journal of the American Medical Association 267:374–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Masi A (2003) The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. Journal of Health Economics 22:151–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wright JM, Perry TL, Basset KL et al (2001) Reporting of six months vs twelve months data in a clinical trial of celecoxib. Journal of American Medical Association 286:2398–2400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson L (2004) GlaxoSmithKline to publish clinical trials after US lawsuit. British Medical Journal 328:1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Whittington CJ, Kendall T, Fonagy P et al (2004) Selective Serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression. Lancet 363:1341–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kastellein JJ, Akdim F, Stores ES et al (2008) Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in fammilial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med 358:1431–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. IOM (2008) Knowing what works in health care. The National Academies Press, Washington, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  18. Healy D (2006) Did regulator fail over selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors? British Medical Journal 333:92–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Turner EH, Mattews AM, Linardatos E et al (2008) Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 358:252–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. ACN (American College of Neurophsycopharmacology) (2004) Executive summary. In: Preliminary report of the task force on SSRIs and suicidal behavior in youth. ACN, Nashville, pp 2–23

    Google Scholar 

  21. CIRB, Coordinamento per l’Integrità della Ricerca Biomedica. Recensioni e link a siti sul conflitto di interesse. www.cirb.it

  22. Osservatorio Nazionale sulla Sperimentazione Clinica dei medicinali. Normativa di riferimento per le sperimentazioni cliniche, i dati relativi ai comitati etici locali e ai centri privati. http://oss-sper-clin.sanita.it/

  23. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, pp 24–25

    Google Scholar 

  24. Elliot C (2006) The drug pusher. Atlantic Monthly, April, pp 2–13

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carlat D (2007) Dr. Drug Rep. The New York Times, November 25, Sec 6, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morgan MA, Danas J, Loewenstein G et al (2006) Interactions of doctors with the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Medical Ethics 32:559–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wager E (2003) How to dance with porcupines: rules and guidelines on doctors’ relations with drug companies. BMJ 326:1196–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fabbri A (2008) Conflict of interest between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. A quali-quantitative study to assess medical students’ attitudes at the University of Bologna. R&P 24:242–254

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fabbri A, Costadoni F, Bribò E, Ciminelli F (2009) Il conflitto di interessi tra medicina e industria farmaceutica: lo studente come promotore di cambiamento sociale. www.salute.Internazionale.it

  30. Krimsky S, Dana J, Loewenstein G et al (1996) Financial interests of authors in scientific journals: editorial practices and author disclosures. Science and engineering ethics 2:395–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Guyatt G, Akl EA (2010) The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution. Ann Intern Med 152:738–741

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF et al (2008) Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. 8th edn. Chest Jun 133(6 Suppl):381S–453S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. The American College of Chest Physicians (2009) Evidence-based educational guidelines for continuing medical education interventions: a critical review of evidence-based educational guidelines. Chest 135:834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baumann MH, Lewis SZ, Gutterman D (2007) ACCP Evidence-based guideline development: a successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations. Chest 132:1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Clancy CM, Slutsky JR (2007) Guidelines for guidelines: we’ve come a long way. Chest 132:746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH et al (2006) Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force. Chest 129:174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Steinbrook R (2009) Controlling conflict of interest — proposal from the Institute of Medicine. N Engl J Med 360:2160–2163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) “Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice”. The National Academies Press, Washington, pp 88–89

    Google Scholar 

  39. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 94

    Google Scholar 

  40. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice”. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 117

    Google Scholar 

  41. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2000) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 160

    Google Scholar 

  42. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 161

    Google Scholar 

  43. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 184

    Google Scholar 

  44. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 187

    Google Scholar 

  45. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 211

    Google Scholar 

  46. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, pp 226–227

    Google Scholar 

  47. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 228

    Google Scholar 

  48. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 236

    Google Scholar 

  49. IOM (Institute Of Medicine) (2009) Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, p 238

    Google Scholar 

  50. AAMC (Association of American Medical Colleges) (2010) In the interest of patients: recommendations for physician financial relationships and clinical decision making. AAMC, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gardiner H (2009) Institute of medicine call for doctors to stop taking gifts from drug makers. New York Times, April 28, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  52. Suzzi F (2009) Proposte dell’Institute of Medicine su come controllare i conflitti di interesse. www.nograziepagoio.it

  53. Smith R (2002) Conflitto di interessi in medicina e nelle riviste mediche. International Society of Drug Bulletins 32:2–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Sanità Pubblica Laboratorio di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italia

    Paolo Pelaia

Authors
  1. Paolo Pelaia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erica Adrario
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lucia Buglioni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UCO e Scuola di Specializzazione di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Catania AOU Policlinico — Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italia

    Antonino Gullo  & Paolo Murabito  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pelaia, P., Adrario, E., Buglioni, L. (2012). Conflitto di interessi: Considerazioni e raccomandazioni. In: Gullo, A., Murabito, P. (eds) Governo clinico e medicina perioperatoria. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2793-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2793-0_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2792-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2793-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation